The chemical water quality of lake nipissing 2003 2004
Sponsored Links
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
1 / 39

The Chemical Water Quality of Lake Nipissing 2003-2004 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 84 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

The Chemical Water Quality of Lake Nipissing 2003-2004. Andrew Paterson Dorset Environmental Science Centre Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch Ontario Ministry of the Environment. Canadian Shield. Ontario’s Inland Lakes. ~260,000 lakes majority on Canadian Shield

Download Presentation

The Chemical Water Quality of Lake Nipissing 2003-2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


The Chemical Water Quality of Lake Nipissing 2003-2004

Andrew Paterson

Dorset Environmental Science Centre

Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch

Ontario Ministry of the Environment


Canadian Shield

Ontario’s Inland Lakes

  • ~260,000 lakes

  • majority on Canadian Shield

  • water quality is generally good

  • ↑ water quality = ↑ value


“A lake is the landscape’s most beautiful and expressive feature.

It is earth’s eye; looking into which the beholder measures the depth of [his] own nature.”

- Henry David Thoreau (Walden)


The economic value of good water quality in Ontario

  • ~2 million adult anglers per year

  • $1.7 billion on goods related to fishing

  • residents own ~1.2 million recreational boats

  • 5.6 million visitors engaged in resource-based tourism

    • (50% participating in water sports, 39% hunting/fishing)

  • $1.1 billion in spending from resource-based tourism

  • commercial fisheries (~$42.5 million)

(Multiple sources, 1998, 1999, 2002, 2003: Min. Natural Resources, Provincial Auditor of Ontario, Min. Tourism and Recreation)


Background

  • In 2002, MOE Northern Region staff submitted a request to the Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch (EMRB) to undertake a water quality survey of Lake Nipissing

  • Surveys had been completed in 1971, 1974 and 1975 (no summary report), and 1988, 1989 and 1990 (Neary & Clark 1992)


Background

  • EMRB staff at Dorset coordinated a volunteer-based sampling program for 2003 and 2004

  • Results of this survey were compiled and compared with the 1988-90 survey in a report co-authored by Clark, Paterson, DeSellas & Ingram (2010)


Clark, Paterson, DeSellas

& Ingram (2010) 57 pp.

Neary & Clark (1992) 66 pp.


49%

45%

5%

Lake Nipissing

~82,200 ha

5

Lake Nipissing and its watershed

Watershed area : Lake area = ~16 : 1


Methods

  • In 2003-04 water samples were collected from a series of 26 stations that were originally sampled in the early 1970s and again in 1988-90

  • In all 3 surveys, samples were collected during the ice-free season:

    • in 1988-90 by a Dorset field technician monthly

    • in 2003-04 by volunteers on a roughly monthly schedule (3 stations were not sampled and the other stations were sampled 5-12 times)


Lake Nipissing showing the 26 stations that were sampled in 1988-90 and re-sampled in 2003-04 (stations 2, 3 and 18 were not re-sampled). Also note that Cache Bay (#7), Callander Bay (#9) and West Bay (#19) are somewhat isolated from the main body of the lake.


Methods

  • Water chemistry from the 1970s and 1988-90 surveys was analyzed by a commercial lab

  • Results from the 2003-04 survey were completed by the MOE water chemistry lab at Dorset

We know that the commercial lab values for total phosphorus were generally lower than the MOE Dorset lab results.


Methods

  • A number of water chemistry parameters were measured in the 2003-04 survey including:

    • pH, alkalinity, aluminum, calcium (Ca), chloride (Cl), colour, conductivity, dissolved inorganic carbon, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), iron, potassium, magnesium, manganese, sodium, ammonium (NH4), nitrate/nitrite (NO3), total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), phosphorus (TP), silica, and sulphate (SO4)


Acid Rain: pH, alkalinity, sulphate


Nutrients: Nitrogen & Phosphorus

Results from a whole-lake experiment conducted at the Experimental Lakes Area, near Kenora, ON in 1973

Carbon & Nitrogen only

Barrier

Carbon, Nitrogen

& PHOSPHORUS

Phosphorus is a nutrient that is the limiting factor “controlling” algal growth in aquatic ecosystems


Long-term declines in phosphorus – Dorset A lakes

Regional trend

Relative trends

Average decline in TP = 28%


Large increases in nitrate between 1988-90 and 2003-04


Seasonal nitrate in Callander Bay

1988

2003

1989

2004

1990


Other interesting results

  • Is road salt affecting the lake?

  • Is dissolved organic carbon (DOC) changing?

  • Are calcium concentrations changing?


Are the Lake Nipissing biota healthy?


Summary

  • Acid rain: both pH and sulphate (SO4) concentration have decreased

  • Nutrients:

    • Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) has not changed, but nitrate/nitrite (NO3) and ammonium (NH4) have increased

    • Total phosphorus (TP) has increased, but this may be a lab artefact (levels are lower than the 1970s)


Summary

  • Other parameters:

    • Chloride (Cl) has increased

    • Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) has not changed

    • Calcium (Ca) has decreased


Thank You

Are there any questions?


MOE – North Bay Office

  • District staff proactively inspect municipal STPs to ensure compliance with MOE issued Certificates of Approval. The district also inspects large sub-surface sewage systems that have a flow rate of >10,000 LPD (usually associated with resorts).

  • District staff conduct comprehensive inspections of hazardous waste generators, waste sites and industrial air dischargers, water users taking >50,000 LPD – all to ensure compliance with MOE issued approvals and permits.


MOE – North Bay Office

  • District Environmental Officers respond to spills and other environmental incidents to ensure proper clean-up and compliance with Ontario’s environmental legislation such as the Environmental Protection Act, Ontario Water Resources Act, Pesticides Act.

  • District staff also conduct initial sampling for suspected Blue Green Algae complaints and forward results to the local Health unit for follow up action (if positive)


MOE – North Bay Office

  • District staff conduct spring phosphorus sampling and in some cases dissolved oxygen surveys.

  • MOE also operates a 24 hour spill reporting center – 1-800-268-6060


Nitrogen Components

TN = TKN + NO3 = TIN + TON

TKN = TON + NH4

TON = TN – (NO3 + NH4) = TKN – NH4

TIN = NO3 + NH4


Observed Changes over Time

* - significant difference at P<0.05


  • Login