1 / 13

Liability for Farming? Rachel G. Lattimore

Liability for Farming? Rachel G. Lattimore. Food Biotechnology: A Legal Perspective Friday, March 14, 2003 University of Richmond School of Law. Is There a Need for A New Liability Scheme?.

sparksj
Download Presentation

Liability for Farming? Rachel G. Lattimore

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Liability for Farming?Rachel G. Lattimore Food Biotechnology: A Legal Perspective Friday, March 14, 2003 University of Richmond School of Law Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin & Kahn, PLLC 1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036-5339 P: 202/857-6000 F: 202/857-6395

  2. Is There a Need for A New Liability Scheme? • Are crops developed through agricultural biotechnology fundamentally different than crops developed by more conventional breeding? • Are these crops as safe as other crops? • Are these crops commonly used? • Do these crops grow differently than others? • Can these crops co-exist with other types of crops?

  3. As Safe As Other Crops • All commercially produced biotechnology-derived crops have been reviewed by at least two federal agencies. • These crops must be cleared for commercial production and sale before they go on the market. • After over a decade in the fields and on the tables, not a single instance of substantiated harm to human health, safety or the environment.

  4. Federal Safety Review of Crops Developed with Biotechnology • USDA has reviewed and cleared all these crops as safe to grow. • FDA has reviewed and cleared all these food crops as safe for humans and animals to eat. • EPA has reviewed and cleared all crops that control pests as safe to eat and safe to grow.

  5. How Safe Is Safe? • Crops with biotechnology traits have been reviewed by federal agencies, which look at toxicity, allergenicity and environmental safety. • Crops without these traits are put on the market without a similar health or environmental safety review. • Is a new liability scheme needed for safety’s sake? What would it require of all crops?

  6. Widespread Adoption • These crops are not different than “regular” crops – these areregular crops. • 75% of the 2002 US soybean crop had a biotech trait.* • 71% of the 2002 US cotton crop had a biotech trait.* • 34% of the 2002 US corn crop had a biotech trait.* • How would “regular” or “normal” be defined under a liability scheme if most of the crop has a biotech trait? * Source – Council for Biotechnology Website

  7. These Crops Grow LikeAll Other Crops • Specific genetic changes made through biotechnology do not change the basic nature of the crop. • These crops pollinate exactly like their “conventional” counterparts. • These crops pose no more risk of cross-pollination with neighboring crops than any other type of crop.

  8. These Crops Grow LikeAll Other Crops • Any open-pollinating crop can cross-pollinate with another neighboring crop. • Growers of specialty crops protect against this: • Blue corn • White corn • Canola • Organic • “Non-GMO”

  9. Pollen Happens • Should a blue corn grower sue a yellow corn grower for planting too close? • Should a sweet corn grower sue a field corn grower for planting too close? • Should you sue your neighbor whose grass makes you sneeze? For the price of a car wash? Claritin? • Should your neighbor have to dig up his lawn & install a rock garden? “Native” grasses?

  10. Co-existence With Other Crops • Specialty Growers Earn a Premium Price • They contract to meet certain standards. • They assume the responsibility of meeting those standards. • They take extra effort to meet those standards. • They are rewarded with a premium price. • They do not share premium with neighbors.

  11. Organic Growing Doesn’t Require Zero Biotech • National Organic Program is process based, and does not exclude unintended presence of biotech material. • “The presence of a detectable residue of a product of excluded methods alone does not necessarily constitute a violation of the [organic] regulations.” - 65 Fed. Reg. 80548, 80632 (Dec. 21, 2000). • Organic Growers who contract for zero percent presence of biotech material are assuming a contractual risk.

  12. Is There a Need for A New Liability Scheme? • Not based on safety. • Not based on the rare, unknown, or uncommon nature of product. • Not based on unique pollen concerns. • Not based on any inability of growers to segregate crops. • Not because organic farming requires new standards.

  13. Thank you. Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin & Kahn, PLLC 1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036-5339 P: 202/857-6000 F: 202/857-6395

More Related