Adaptation
Download
1 / 28

Adaptation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 150 Views
  • Uploaded on

Adaptation. 713/813, Lecture 7. The most conspicuous evidence of evolution by natural selection is the fit of organisms to their environment. Yet quantifying adaptation continues to elude biologists. How do you measure adaptation?.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Adaptation' - sorley


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Adaptation

Adaptation

713/813, Lecture 7


The most conspicuous evidence of evolution by natural selection is the fit of organisms to their environment.

Yet quantifying adaptation continues to elude biologists.


How do you measure adaptation
How do you measure adaptation? selection is the fit of organisms to their environment.

  • We mean the process that leads to the greater fitness of an organism to its environment; its outcome is also an adaptation

  • Break into groups of three and discuss, come up with three alternative methods

  • Also please briefly consider 1 strength and 1 weakness of the class thus far (of knowledge or approach)


2010 methods
2010 methods selection is the fit of organisms to their environment.

Class answers:

  • Experimental evolution of transplanted populations, measure change in morphology or physiology

  • Change abiotic conditions, observe community response

  • Look for specific traits in a specific environment (in parallel)

  • Measure “success/failure” rate of a likely adaptive trait (eg birds eating nuts, bacteria eating food)

  • Correlate population size with success (or perhaps better, reproductive rate)

  • Transplant expt with no evolution; measure predation/prey responses

  • Swap symbionts and measure symbiotic phenotypes (eg light)

  • Correlate phylogenetic branch lengths (of multiple lineages) in specific environments

  • Force competition in a common environment (cage match); see who wins


2012 methods
2012 methods selection is the fit of organisms to their environment.

  • Knockouts -> loss of adaptation?

  • Artificial selection  look for correlated effects

  • Growth rate/output in environmental proxy of “reality”

  • Rate or efficiency of consumption of resources

  • Long-term observation focusing on change in phenotypes related to reproductive success

  • Look for examples of parallelism and/or convergence

  • Read functional output of a genome, link to environment

  • Change environment, measure change in expression

  • Experimentally increase competition for a limiting resource

  • Look for homogeneity of alleles over time (evidence of competitive advantage)

  • Look for positive/negative effects of plasticity via manipulation

  • Manipulate pairwise interactions among species (commensal/symbiosis)

  • Extent of genetic variation might be a proxy for selection

  • Manipulate other community members, test for effect on one population or individual


Course pluses and minuses so far
Course pluses and minuses so far selection is the fit of organisms to their environment.

Pluses

  • Blogs b/c it reveals thought process of peers

  • Class and recitation discussion of articles

  • Diverse background among classmates

  • Forces active learning and discussion/engagement

  • Paper dissection

  • New tabs from browsing

Minuses

  • Iack of focus on blog assignment

  • Intimidiation re: background

  • Reading primary literature can be overwhelming

  • Not enough time to read work of peers

  • No textbook

  • Limited sense of structure

  • Lack of printed syllabus

  • Chaotic website

  • Need PPT ahead of time


One method is comparative
One method is Comparative selection is the fit of organisms to their environment.

  • It MUST be grounded in phylogeny to as to guarantee the comparison of like things, if not strict homologssee: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phylogenetic_comparative_methods

  • If two species share the same ancestor, and one has a trait that improves its fit to its home environment that the other lacks, you may infer it is an adaptation


Another convergent evolution
Another: convergent evolution selection is the fit of organisms to their environment.

  • Repeated evolution of the same trait in replicate populations is a hallmark of adaptation


Whats best measure it directly
Whats best? Measure it directly! selection is the fit of organisms to their environment.

  • Compare performance (fitness) of two genotypes and measure difference

  • Ideal: compare ancestor with evolved directly (head-to-head competition)

  • Both of these are often impractical


Fitness selection is the fit of organisms to their environment. = Ln [ N 1 (Day 1) / N1 (Day 0) ]

Ln [ N 2 (Day 1) / N2 (Day 0) ]

Adaptation may be quantified directly

Day 0

Day 1

Evolved

Ancestor

Determine

1 :2

Plate on agar to determine the ratio of 1 :2

Ratio of realized growth


Experimental evolution

Experimental evolution selection is the fit of organisms to their environment.

Studying evolution, and usually adaptation, in action


The outcome of selection for high and low oil content selection is the fit of organisms to their environment.

in the Illinois corn experiment.


William Dellinger selection is the fit of organisms to their environment.

1880-1886

Selected for thermotolerance of microorganisms

60 F  158 F

Unfortunately incubator destroyed along with samples


- selection is the fit of organisms to their environment.

+

Generation 0 ------------------------- Generation 20,000+ è

  • Lenski Long-term Experimental

  • Conditions

  • 12 replicate cultures

  • single genotype of Escherichia coli B

  • daily serial transfer

  • single resource and temperature

  • no sex


Mutation rate itself evolves in certain populations
Mutation rate itself evolves in certain populations selection is the fit of organisms to their environment.

Non-mutator

Mutator

Population

Generations

Sniegowski et al., Nature 387, 703-705 (1997)


More on the mechanics of microbial experimental evolution
More on the mechanics of selection is the fit of organisms to their environment.microbial experimental evolution

  • Batch (serial) culture = open system

  • Chemostat = closed system

  • Turbidostat = closed

  • Static culture (liquid or solid) = closed


Chemostat selection is the fit of organisms to their environment.


Chemostats select for nutrient affinity
Chemostats select for nutrient affinity selection is the fit of organisms to their environment.


Static culture
Static culture selection is the fit of organisms to their environment.


What are the key variables brainstorm
What are the key variables? (brainstorm) selection is the fit of organisms to their environment.

  • Population size (N), and effective population size (Ne)

  • Mutation rate

  • Recombination?

  • Parasites?

  • Constant or fluctuating environment?

  • Mass-action or structured environment?


Some questions addressed by experimental evolution
Some questions addressed by experimental evolution selection is the fit of organisms to their environment.

  • What is the tempo and mode of evolution? (gradual or punctuated, limits, etc?)

  • What factors promote or constrain adaptation?

  • What are the consequences of adaptation?

  • What are the mechanisms of adaptation?

  • Is the mutation rate optimal or minimal?

  • How do mutations interact?


Is evolution repeatable
Is evolution repeatable? selection is the fit of organisms to their environment.

“I call this experiment ‘replaying life’s tape.’ You press the rewind button and, making sure you thoroughly erase everything that actually happened, go back to any time and place in the past – say to the seas of the Burgess Shale. Then let the tape run again and see if the repetition looks at all like the original.”

“The bad news is that we cannot possibly perform the experiment…”

-S.J. Gould, Wonderful Life: the Burgess Shale and the nature of history (1989)


We can replay evolution
We CAN replay evolution selection is the fit of organisms to their environment.

Replicate populations evolving under identical conditions address whether evolution is repeatable.

Do you predict phenotypic repeatability (parallelism)?

Do you predict genetic repeatability?


ad