1 / 29

An Overview of Survey on Metadata Standards and Best Practices for E-Resources March 25, 2014

An Overview of Survey on Metadata Standards and Best Practices for E-Resources March 25, 2014 Bie-hwa Ma Chengzhi Wang. Acknowledgement & Announcement. Thank you for participating in the survey! Thank all of you for participating in the workshop!

soren
Download Presentation

An Overview of Survey on Metadata Standards and Best Practices for E-Resources March 25, 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. An Overview of Survey on Metadata Standards and Best Practices for E-Resources March 25, 2014 Bie-hwa Ma Chengzhi Wang

  2. Acknowledgement & Announcement Thank you for participating in the survey! Thank all of you for participating in the workshop! Thank all CEAL members for supporting the Task Force! Thank all the CTP members and the CEAL ERMB Task Force members for organizing this workshop Electronic Resources: Librarians and Vendors Round Table 9:30-11:00 pm, Thursday, March 27, Liberty Ballroom C, Philadelphia Marriott Downtown Jointly organized by CTP, CCM, CJM, CKM, and CPS, a dialog between East Asian librarians and vendors of electronic contents. Open to all CEAL members as well as vendors and electronic information providers

  3. Survey Overview Outline Why the Survey? How the Survey Was Done? What Are the Survey Results? What to Do Next?

  4. Survey Goal Environmental scan: survey as a systematic way to get empirical data Preliminary understanding of the level of awareness Identify the awareness gap between librarians and vendors, and how to bridge them Improve understanding, expand knowledge, enhance skills, and determine areas/topics to work on

  5. Survey Preparation & Design Preparation, Planning General planning and preparation Google form as the tool Designing questionnaires Deciding the length and format Testing Questionnaire Design Vendor/Publisher Version and Library Version in English, carefully reviewed by metadata and non-metadata professionals in the U.S. Translated into CJK languages with terminologies verified by professionals in Asia Reviewing, discussing, deciding, and finalizing, in English and CJK languages

  6. Survey Invitation Participation Invitation Inviting library professionals and support staff Focus on academic libraries Sent invitations through CEAL listserv and CALA (Chinese American Librarians Association) listserv in US Post it through the listservs of Library associations, consortia, and Facebook groups in Mainland china, Taiwan, Hon Kong, and Macau Inviting vendors/publishers Focus on providers of e-resources Sent English, CJK invitations to vendor/publisher sources and publisher associations via CCM, CJM and CKM

  7. Survey Management & Analysis Coordination and Organization Arranging and rationalizing timeline, and making necessary changes Coordinating work of sub groups, including online form, e-mail texts and attached Word files, all in English and 4 other scripts Organizing responses, re-inputting e-mailed responses, and checking, validating, normalizing collected data Analyzing Data An overview of Preliminary Results: Library & Vendors With Focus on Library Survey; with Briefing on Vendors Survey

  8. Region & Library Type: 73 Participants

  9. Position

  10. Languages of Resources Primarily Managed/Served

  11. Metadata from Vendors: Current &Expected

  12. E-resources Metadata Received:Current & Expected

  13. Use of Metadata in Knowledge Bases (KBs) by Link Resolution Services

  14. Few CJK providers/publishers have interaction with link resolution services Challenging Level: Following CJK-related Issues in the KBs of Link Resolutions Services

  15. Link resolution service providers' lacking expertise to manage CJK resources Challenging Level: Following CJK-related Issues in the KBs of Link Resolutions Services

  16. Awareness of Established National & Int’l Standards for E-resources

  17. Standards Vendors Follow in Supplying Metadata: Current & Expected

  18. Unawareness of the standards Anticipated Challenging Issues When Promoting Metadata Standards to Vendors

  19. Standards are too complicated to understand Anticipated Challenging Issues When Promoting Metadata Standards to Vendors

  20. It is tough to communicate with CJK vendors/publishers in making changes Anticipated Challenging Issues When Promoting Metadata Standards to Vendors

  21. Survey Demographics: 22 Participants of Vendors Survey

  22. Types & Languages of E-resources Primarily Provided

  23. Metadata Service Provision

  24. Relationship with, & Frequency Updating Title Lists to, Link Resolution Services

  25. Awareness of Established National and Int’l Standards for Electronic Resources

  26. Awareness of E-Resources Standards & Best Practices: Library and Vendors Vendors/Publishers Library Staff

  27. Compliance of Standards & Best Practices: Currently Follow & Interested in Following

  28. Reasons Why not Complying with Some or All of the Standards and Best Practices

  29. Thank You

More Related