1 / 5

ENBIS Challenge 2009 Thomas Mühlenstädt Institut für Mathematische Statistik und

ENBIS Challenge 2009 Thomas Mühlenstädt Institut für Mathematische Statistik und industrielle Anwendungen. New Configurations: 4 GB RAM 2.4 GHz 17‘ Screen. Configuration:. Further comments on Configurations: No differences between stores

sopoline-knowles
Download Presentation

ENBIS Challenge 2009 Thomas Mühlenstädt Institut für Mathematische Statistik und

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ENBIS Challenge 2009 Thomas Mühlenstädt Institut für Mathematische Statistik und industrielle Anwendungen

  2. New Configurations: 4 GB RAM 2.4 GHz 17‘ Screen Configuration: • Further comments on Configurations: • No differences between stores • 864 possible combinations • No empty class • Costumers prefer „medium“ configurations

  3. Price / Revenue: Price minimum requirement:£300 15“, 4h Battery, 1 GB RAM, 1.5GHz, 40 GB HD Promotional sales activities: August / September: Increase of daily sales volume: 100 % Increase of daily revenue: 86 % December: Increase of daily sales volume: 78 % Increase of daily revenue: 70 % Store: No influence Time: Decreasing trend, depending on memory Discount?: 5 stores granted discount of approx 30% during March, June, September, December Second and Third Jump: Marketing, Price? New Configurations: 4 GB RAM 2.4 GHz 17‘ Screen

  4. Spatial topics: • Map of London • Location of Stores: • „big“ stores • „medium“ stores • „small“ stores • population density plot • Conclusions: • Some stores might be better • Location not always good Revenue per day in each store: Big differences between stores

  5. Conclusions: • Configurations: • Offer more hard ware • Also „smaller“ specifications • Price / Revenue: • Discounts not effective, • Revenue increased two times • Store locations: • Concentrate on „big“ shops • Some stores might perform better • Some stores are not located very good • Use of data: • More connotation

More Related