1 / 14

Watershed Management in MA

Watershed Management in MA. The Deerfield River Watershed Action Plan. http://www.mass.gov/envir/water/publications/WAPs/Deerfield_WAP_2004.pdf. Kate Crawford, River Corridor Management, October 10, 2005. MA River Management. Watershed-scale management approach Emphasis on: Water quality

sook
Download Presentation

Watershed Management in MA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Watershed Management in MA The Deerfield River Watershed Action Plan http://www.mass.gov/envir/water/publications/WAPs/Deerfield_WAP_2004.pdf Kate Crawford, River Corridor Management, October 10, 2005

  2. MA River Management • Watershed-scale management approach • Emphasis on: • Water quality • Water quantity • Open space • Stakeholder involvement

  3. MA River Management (cont.) • Development of Management Plans: • Federal – Wild & Scenic Rivers (Connecticut) • State = Watershed Action Plan (WAP) • State DEP (Blackstone River) • Local Resource Planning Commissions (Millers River) • Private Consultant (Deerfield River) • Community

  4. The Deerfield River Watershed • 665 mi2 • 318 mi2 = VT 347 mi2 = MA • ~70 mi long • elevation change: ~ 3,880 ft. • 12 major sub-watersheds http://www.deerfieldriver.org/

  5. Watershed Landuse Characteristics • Population: 47,000 people • 81% Forested – Mohawk Trail & Debuque State Forest Land, large pieces of private, undeveloped land • PS pollution prevalent • 13% Agriculture/Open Land – hay, corn, dairy production • Significant source of NPS pollution • 4% Urban/Residential – southern portion of watershed (Greenfield = 18,000 people) • Significant source of PS pollution • 2% Water

  6. Landuse http://www.viewsfromabove.com/vfaPublishing/CFeilwebsite/pixs/%20MAB%20photos/MAB.075.jpg http://www.viewsfromabove.com/vfaPublishing/CFeilwebsite/pixs/ %20MAB%20photos/MAB.075.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts

  7. Social & Political Characteristics • High social diversity • Class stratification • Value differences • Small governments run by better educated community members • Few economic resources

  8. Why Manage the Deerfield River? • Conflicting river use • Hydroelectricity production vs. recreation • Water quality • Aquatic and riparian habitat • Land use management • Federal and State mandates http://www.maplehousebb.com/images/zoar.jpg http://www.msp.umb.edu/Gelpke/Finished/shelburne_falls.htm

  9. Management Documents • Deerfield River Water Quality Assessment Report (2000) • Guide for DEP work • Franklin Regional Council of Governments (FRCOG 2004) • Guide for local governments, Deerfield River Watershed Association • Deerfield River Watershed Action Plan (2004) • Guide for stakeholders, non-profits

  10. The Planning Process • Strong collaboration between the DRWT, FRCOG and the State • Collection of appropriate data • Obtaining from various databases • Monitoring • Stakeholder involvement • Series of meetings, public forums • Development of 6 goals • Action plan for achieving goals • Formulation of document by private consultant • Review of document by stakeholders • Identification of potential funding sources

  11. WAP Goals • Coordinate Flow Management to Benefit Multiple Uses • Protect and Improve Water Quality in the Watershed • Restore and Improve Stream Continuity and Aquatic Habitat • Protect Wetlands and Promote Terrestrial Habitat Diversity • Provide Safe Recreation and Public Access/Use • Protect Open Space and Maintain Rural Landscape

  12. Recommendations • Education – landuse BMP’s, ecological effects of dumping, septic system maintenance, importance of community involvement, safe recreation • Regulations/Incentives – septic system maintenance, illegal dumping, riparian buffers, open space • Ecological Conservation – continued and improved monitoring, river continuity (i.e. dam removal, fish passage structures), cold water fishery habitat (increased protection), invasive species, open space • Collaboration – state agencies, town governments, interest groups, • Funding – identify and secure sources of funding for various recommended projects

  13. What’s next? • Development of Water Quality Action Plan • Collaboration with Vermont • Identification of funding • Continued Monitoring • Adaptive Management (ecological conservation, stakeholders, collaborative efforts)

  14. References • Deerfield River Watershed Action Plan • Deerfield River Water Quality Assessment Report • River Management Society

More Related