California department of corrections and rehabilitation
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 29

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 92 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION. 2012 National Association of Sentencing Commissions Terri McDonald, Undersecretary, Operations. All Time High. October 2006, CDCR reached an all time high for inmate population and September 2007 and all time high for parolees

Download Presentation

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


California department of corrections and rehabilitation

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION

2012 National Association of Sentencing Commissions

Terri McDonald, Undersecretary, Operations


All time high

All Time High

  • October 2006, CDCR reached an all time high for inmate population and September 2007 and all time high for parolees

    • 173,500 inmates

      • 160,000 were in institutions

    • 128,000 parolees

      • 15,000+ were in prisons

  • Design Capacity was 80,000 beds

    • Overcrowding rate = 200%

  • All Population Figures in Presentation are Approximates

2


Institution population

Institution Population


Determinate sentence credit earning

Determinate Sentence Credit Earning

1977-1982 – Determinate Sentence – 1/3 Time Earned and Credit Loss Potential

1983 – 6 Varied Earning Schedules – Including Day-for-Day

1987 – Parole Violators Earn Credit

1991 – Designated Offenders with 2 Prior Offenses Ineligible for Credit Earning

1993 – Segregation Offenders Ineligible for Credit Earning

1994 – Serious Offenders Maximum 20% Credit Earning

– Third Strikers 20% Credit Earning for Determinate - Ineligible for Indeterminate

- Violent Offenders 15% Credit Earning

1998 – Murders/Attempted Murders of a Peace Officer/Firefighter Ineligible for Credit

2003 – Fire Camp Offenders 2-for-1 Credit When Assigned to Camp

2010 – Credit Earning Assumed, Even if Not Assigned to a Program

– Credit Applied from Date of Arrest, as Opposed to arrival to CDCR

– Milestone Completion Credits – Maximum 42 Days Per Year

- Fire Camp 2-for-1 at Completion of Program

2011 – Jails Offenders Eligible for Credit Similar to CDCR Offenders


Factors leading to change

Factors Leading to Change

  • Overcrowding and Pending Supreme Court Ruling

  • Federal Court Oversight on Most Aspects of Prison Management

  • Recidivism Rates

  • Fiscal Constraints at State and Local Levels

  • Programming Limitations at State and Local Levels

  • Churning of Prison Offenders

    • 45,000 Parole Violators Per Year

    • 10,000 Intakes and Releases Per Month

  • Criminogenic Consequence of Mixing Offenders

  • Collective Will to Resolve


Three judge panel order

Three Judge Panel Order

  • United States Supreme Court Upheld June 2011

    • The State must reduce overcrowding from 200% to 137.5% by June 27, 2013

    • Reduce from 141,000 inmates at existing 33 prisons to 112,000 inmates

6


Public safety realignment ab 109

Public Safety Realignment (AB 109)

Local custody for current/prior non-violent, non-serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Eligibility

No Prison for Parole ViolationsEstablishes Local Post-release SupervisionLocal Planning and Funding


Public safety realignment

Public Safety Realignment

  • Revises the definition of felony to include certain crimes that are punishable in jail for more than one year.

  • Maintains length of sentences.

  • Provides Alternative Options other than incarceration as Determined Locally


Who is sentenced to state prison

Who is Sentenced to State Prison?

The following sentences must be served in state prison:

  • Prior or current serious or violent felony as described in PC 1192.7 (c) or 667.5 (c)

  • The defendant is required to register as a sex offender pursuant to PC 290

  • Excludes certain other specified crimes

    Note: “excluded crimes” are those for which a defendant can still be committed to state prison.


Additional features of realignment

Additional Features of Realignment

Enhanced local custody and supervision tools:

  • Contracting Ability

  • Alternative custody tools for county jails

  • Home detention for low-level offenders

  • Local jail credits consistent with prison credits (Day-for-day).


California department of corrections and rehabilitation

No state prison inmates were transferredto county jails.

Virtually All State Felons Complete Their Sentences in Custody

X


Post release supervision opposed to state parole

Post-release Supervision Opposed to State Parole

County-level supervision upon release from prison

  • Current Non-violent offenders

  • Current Non-serious offenders

  • Sex offenders

    County Does NOT supervise:

  • 3rd strikers and Lifers

  • High risk sex offenders as defined by CDC

    • Use of Static 99 Risk Tool

  • Mentally Disordered Offenders


Post release supervision continued

Post-release Supervision (continued)

  • Allows revocations up to 180 days .

  • Graduated sanctions including flash incarceration at the local level (revocations lasting longer than 10 days require a court hearing).

  • Individuals on post-release supervision without any violations after six months can be discharged.

  • Courts may adjudicate violations and new conditions of release at the local level.


State parole supervision

State Parole Supervision

Commitment offense:

  • Current serious or violent felony as described in PC 1192.7 (c) or 667.5(c)

  • The offender has been convicted of a third strike

  • The person is classified as a mentally Disordered Offender (MDO)

  • Or the person is classified as a high risk sex offender.


State parole supervision1

State Parole Supervision

Parole revocations will be served in county jail – not in state prison - for no more than 180 days. (Reduced Prison Population by 14,000)

Contracting back from the state for revocations is not an option.Graduated sanctions including flash incarceration at the local level (revocations lasting longer than 10 days require a BPH hearing).Only persons previously sentenced to a term of life can be revoked to prison


State parole revocation hearings

State Parole Revocation Hearings

Parole revocation process remains with Board of Parole Hearings (BPH) until July 1, 2013. The revocation process will transition to the Courts after July 1, 2013.


Impacts to cdcr

Impacts to CDCR

  • Reduced Prison Population

  • Elimination of Non-Traditional Beds

  • Reduced Prison Violence/Incidents

  • Reduce Parole Agent Caseloads

  • Reduced CDCR Budget

  • Increased Percentage of Offenders Programming

  • Increase County Relationships

  • Improved Court Monitoring Scores


Prison population

Prison Population

  • On July 25, 2012

    • 134,361 inmates

    • 120,286 were in institutions (excluding camps)

  • Design Capacity was 79,756 beds

    • Overcrowding rate = 151%

18


Parole population

Parole Population

  • September 28, 2011

    • 105,220 Parolees

  • On July 25, 2012

    • 69,551 Parolees

19


California department of corrections and rehabilitation

20


Blueprint for the future

Blueprint for the Future

  • Contract Beds

  • Eliminate Civil Addict Program

  • Classification Project

  • Program Enhancement – Reentry Hubs

  • Alternative Custody Program

  • Construction

    • Medical Facilities – 2,143 Beds

    • Health Care Improvements - $700 Million

    • Three Infill Projects – 2,400 Beds

  • 145% Request to the Courts


Prison closure

Prison Closure

  • Closure of California Rehabilitation Center (CRC) in Norco by FY 15/16

    • 2,491 design beds

      • Severely dilapidated wooden structure housing units

      • More than $200 million cost avoidance in repairs

      • $160 million annual operation cost savings


State support budget savings with realignment

State Support Budget Savings With Realignment

  • Fiscal Year 11-12

    • $450 million

  • Fiscal Year 12-13:

    • $1 billion

  • Fiscal Year 13-14:

    • $1.3 billion

  • Fiscal Year 14-15:

    • $1.46 billion

  • Fiscal Year 15-16:

    • $1.54 billion

  • 11% of State General Fund to 7% of GF


Construction cost comparison

CONSTRUCTION COST COMPARISON


County funding

County Funding

  • On-Going Appropriate from Sales Tax

    • 1.0625% of Sales Tax

    • Percentage of Vehicle License Fee

  • Annual Allocation Formulas for Funding to the Counties Determined by the California State Association of Counties (CSAC)

    • Formula Driven as Determined by CSAC

  • $500 Million for Capacity Construction/Improvements


Community correctional partnership ccp

Community Correctional Partnership (CCP)

  • CCP Recommends Allocation.

  • Members:

    • Chaired by Chief of Probation

    • Presiding Judge or designee

    • Public Defender

    • District Attorney

    • Sheriff

    • Police Chief

    • BOS Designee from Health and Human Services Divisions (Mental Health Provider, Substance Abuse Treatment, etc)


Fiscal year allocations counties

Fiscal Year AllocationsCounties

  • FY 11/12

    • $345.3 Million Counties as Recommended by CCP

    • $12.7 Million District Attorneys/Public Defenders

    • $25 Million Training Grants (One Time)

    • $7.85 Million Planning Grants CCP (One Time)

    • $399.85 Million Total

  • FY 12/13 and 13/14

    • $842.9 Million Counties as Recommended by CCP

    • $14.6 Million District Attorneys/Public Defenders

    • $857.5 Million Total


Next steps

Next Steps

  • Rehabilitation Program Expansion at State and Local Level

  • Hiring, Recruiting and Training at Local Level

  • Data Collection and Targeted Research

  • Front Line Law Enforcement Grant Funding

  • Jail Capacity Solutions and Funding

  • State/County and County/County Collaboration on Programs

  • Realigned Crimes Evaluation


Contact information

Contact Information

  • Terri McDonald

  • (916)323-6001

  • [email protected]

  • www.cdcr.ca.gov


  • Login