1 / 19

Feed for Thought

Feed for Thought. George Gale Naphtha Information Services November, 2006. N I S. Naphtha won’t quit. Data source: NIS. Naphtha goes eight for twelve. Data source: NIS. Naphtha cracking requires imports. Data source: cracking imports, EIA and NIS. Condensate gives heavy feed inertia.

sondra
Download Presentation

Feed for Thought

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Feed for Thought George Gale Naphtha Information ServicesNovember, 2006 NIS

  2. Naphtha won’t quit. Data source: NIS

  3. Naphtha goes eight for twelve. Data source: NIS

  4. Naphtha cracking requires imports. Data source: cracking imports, EIA and NIS

  5. Condensate gives heavy feed inertia. Data source: cracking imports, EIA and NIS

  6. USA needs full-sized feedstocks. • Under-sized feeds have their place. • Mideast ethane crackers will take all the ethylene derivatives business they want. • Propane will become desperate and end up cheap. • Embarrassed producers will want to upgrade it. • How much of it will the mature markets want, anyway? • Gulf coast crackers will thrive by making a broad range of olefins and aromatics efficiently. • Propylene, butadiene, and aromatics have no Mideast. • We’ve seen these co-products rein-in light feed cracking in 2006. • No one, anywhere, gets naphtha substantially cheaper than anyone else. • Gasoline should give pygas good seasonal support in USA.

  7. US gasoline must become expensive. Data source: EIA

  8. SUV’s don’t make much difference. • Four factors drive motor fuel demand: • Population • Mobility • Vehicle loading • Vehicle efficiency • The first two account for growth of US mogas sales • ’00–’04 Growth, %/yr Miles/person, +1.68 Vehicle miles, +1.88 Mogas sales, +1.79 • Vehicles, as used, actually became more efficient. Data source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics

  9. Caught between what we want . . . • Let’s try to solve USA’s mogas problem. • Limitations: • Supply can only increase 1.3% per year. Today that means 120 kb/d per year including ethanol, 97 kb/d pure gasoline. By 2010, it means 147 kb/d with ethanol, 103 kb/d pure, assuming agribusiness reaches 7.5 B gallons/year ethanol by 2010. • Refinery expansion remains difficult in USA. • Oil companies hesitate to expand in a hostile environment. • Expansion of foreign refineries capable of making US-spec mogas comes slowly. • America’s population grows 1.0% per year. • Americans want to live in ways and places which require auto travel. • Americans resist ride-sharing, driving at fuel-efficient speeds, and other mature behavior. • Many Americans cannot afford new automobiles. Data source: EIA, Census Bureau, and NIS

  10. . . . and what it costs. Data source: NIS

  11. USA only has to give up everything. • “Mixture of evils” case • We compromise everything else so our population can keep growing almost as fast as our gasoline supply. • Barely feasible • 40.1 mpg autos replace ’05’s • Autos do 94.1% of EPA rating • A mix of EPA’s top four (all hybrids) would do it. • 20% Prius hybrid • 20% Civic hybrid • 20% Camry hybrid • 40% Escape fwd hybrid • That’ll work. Americans will like this plan. Data source: NIS

  12. Price will restrict mogas sales. • USA’s mogas problem has no easy solutions. • Social and demographic forces push demand to the limit of supply. • Our politicians lack the will to implement solutions. • They couldn’t streamline refinery permitting this year. • They won’t pass unpopular measures which would limit demand. • They actually make the problem worse. • The brighter ones know we must have high prices. • They might impose a profits tax. • If the pump price restricts sales, gasoline becomes independent of crude oil and refining costs. • During the high season, when price must restrict consumption, cracker products like pygas and T/X mix will sell to refiners and blenders for very good money.

  13. US naphtha imports increase. Data source: EIA and NIS

  14. Gasoline gets the imports. Data source: EIA and NIS

  15. Cracking naphtha doesn’t travel very far. Data source: EIA and NIS

  16. USA gets local support. • Some Western Hemisphere countries continue to export naphtha. • USA has only one big rival for Americas paraffinic naphtha, Brazil. • Diluent for Canada tar sands crude has taken some cracker feed. But availability rises anyway. • Mogas blending faces sulfur, octane, and RVP restrictions. • Density effect keeps cracking from getting much N+A naphtha now. Data source: EIA and NIS

  17. East leaves West. • The East (Asia, the Mideast, and PADD5 USA) sent surplus naphtha to the West, 2004 through 2006. • By 2H 2007, the flow will likely reverse. • New naphtha re-run projects, which split FRN to get reformer feedstock, add a new dimension to Asia’s paraffinic market. • This West-to-East arbitrage will last only briefly. But it will give USA a rival for some European excess supply while it does. Data source: NIS

  18. Europe needs customers. • Europe (including its suburbs – north Africa, Near East, and European Russia) has naphtha to spare. • Surplus naphtha goes to Asia and South America as well as North America. • Discontinuation of ethylene projects assures a European surplus for years to come. • Europe’s exports stop drifting toward blending and reforming grades. • This drift helped the Mideast supply cracker feed to USA. Data source: NIS

  19. Condensate has another good year in it. • Condensate comes from just a few sources. • Some seasonality crept into the program in 2006 as residual oil tanked. • But the lightest grades largely escape refinery competition. • Some opportunities, like Libya, haven’t done much. • A few new streams should arrive late in ’07. • A big one, Bejaia, got a reprieve from delay of the Skikda splitter. Data source: EIA and NIS

More Related