1 / 14

Shaping L2 and literacy acquisition: Teachers’ strategies for low-literacy background learners

Shaping L2 and literacy acquisition: Teachers’ strategies for low-literacy background learners. Alan Williams. The context. • ESL/EAL in Australia (Melbourne), over 30 years of working with different groups of low literacy ESL learners, in schools and in adult education

sona
Download Presentation

Shaping L2 and literacy acquisition: Teachers’ strategies for low-literacy background learners

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Shaping L2 and literacy acquisition: Teachers’ strategies for low-literacy background learners Alan Williams

  2. The context • • ESL/EAL in Australia (Melbourne), over 30 years of working with different groups of low literacy ESL learners, in schools and in adult education • • Research has focused on needs and experiences of particular groups, eg Oliver, Haig & Grote (2009), Miller, Mitchell & Brown (2005), • • This has found mismatches in expectations between schools, and families and students • • Some specialist teachers within ESL programs with accumulated experience • • Some teaching materials, but never enough! • • How do successful and experienced teachers work with low literacy students? What are their insights that inform their work with these learners?

  3. The study • Investigate the teaching strategies used by experienced teachers of ESL low-literacy background students • See how these teachers see low literacy students compared to ‘regular ESL’ students, and how their needs compare • What has informed these teachers, and how have they learned to work with these students? • What are the teachers doing? – as the classroom is the most significant second language environment for these learners - How may this shape the learners’ SLA and literacy development?

  4. Data: Classes • Teachers selected through knowledge of schools with experience teaching low literacy ESL learners – approach school, provider/ teacher recommended by principal or curriculum leader • Secondary, long-term not yet collected • Adult recent arrival learner group based analysis of PD video (AMES 2006)

  5. Data collected • Observation of one class (1-2 hours), notes of class activities in terms of focus on : language learning, literacy learning, other learning. • Content of learning more than learning processes • Interview with each teacher: - their view of the needs of low literacy background learners , - the teaching strategies they use, - how the lesson observed compares to other lessons - how teachers learned about working with low literacy students

  6. Observations: Focus of the classes Recent Arrivals Long-term residents 1 2 A

  7. Observations: language focus Recent arrivals Long-term residents 1 2 A

  8. Observations: Literacy focus Recent arrivals Long term residents A 2A

  9. Observations: Other learning Recent arrivals Long-Term residents 1 2 A

  10. Observations: Summary • A lot of attention to expectations of classroom routines and behaviour in recent arrivals, especially in the school sector (strong emphasis on ‘doing school’, statement and re-statement of expectations) • Personalisation of learning for adults • Attending to processes of learning; organising, relating learning to prior knowledge • Language and literacy focus around non-linguistic meanings/content • Long term primary: teacher juggling several levels of literacy development, low-literacy background ESL one of a number (less sharp focus on this group) • Language focus less explicit in school group than in language programs • Often slow pace to complete tasks for low-literacy background classes

  11. Interviews: What the teachers say about learning needs • Slow pace of learning of low-literacy background learners, need for constant repetition • Different prior knowledge to schooled ESL learners; less congruent with the prior knowledge assumed in schooling • Learning needs are centred on learning-to-learn skills and development of self-awareness of themselves as learners • Need for concrete, activity base for learning activities • Need to learn important assumed content knowledge and skills for participation in mainstream school • Low-literacy background students need to experience success • Huge perceived gap between current skills and mainstream expectations

  12. Interviews: teaching strategies • Extensive modelling of classroom and learning activities • Need for students to achieve and be challenged • Highly structured activities and texts, frequent repetition, revision • Spend a lot of time working with a limited amount of learning material • Control of texts, which are kept basic, in order to focus on essential features (less ‘naturalistic’ texts)

  13. Conclusions • Low literacy ESL learners exposed to limited range of input, in highly structured activities with strong visual support, and mostly meanings related to experience and needs • Non-linguistic content learning sets context for explicit focus/noticing of elements of the language-literacy system • Strong emphasis on learning about learning (including thinking about themselves as learners) and school/classroom routines.

  14. References AMES Victoria (2006) Into Learning, Melbourne, Australia (Video). Miller, J., Mitchell, J. & Brown, J (2005) African refugees with interrupted schooling in the high school mainstream: Dilemmas for teachers, Prospect 20(2), p19 to33. Oliver, R., Y Haig & E. Grote (2009) Addressing the educational needs of African refugee background students: Perceptions of West Australian Stakeholders, TESOL in Context,19(1) p23 to 38.

More Related