1 / 18

Is the present school system of knowledge assessment correspondent to modern education ?

Is the present school system of knowledge assessment correspondent to modern education ?. performed Shvaleva Maria group -1-080114.

soleil
Download Presentation

Is the present school system of knowledge assessment correspondent to modern education ?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Is the present school system of knowledge assessment correspondent to modern education? performed Shvaleva Maria group -1-080114

  2. Good- afternoon, dear teachers and students. I am glad to see you. Let me introduce myself. My name is Maria Shvaleva. I came from Kazakhstan. I have always dreamt of studying in Moscow and at last I am here. I am a first year student of Moscow Shoes Modeling and Marketing college. One of my favourite subjects is English. I am fond of learning foreign languages. It` s not only a hobby. My future profession of an accountant will be connected with English as well.

  3. As I am a teenager I read a lot about the rights of teenagers. While studying teenagers` rights on education I got interested in the system of schoolchildren knowledge assessment. Do pupils have rights to have their knowledge proper measured and assessed? So, my theme sounds like this: Is the present school system of knowledge assessment correspondent to modern education?

  4. It was Germany which was the first to start assessing pupils` knowledge. In Russia it happened in 1737, during the reign of Anna Ioanovna. It`s interesting to note there were different scales of knowledge assessment in Russia 3-, 5- and 8-, 10-,12-point ones. And only 5-point system was officially adopted in 1837 by the Ministry of Еducation. «1» — poor knowledge; «2» — satisfactory; «З» — enough; «4» — good; «5» — excellent. And it is still being used in the majority of Russian schools and colleges.

  5. Teachers and psychologists are sure that a school mark must: • correspondent to teaching programs, t.i. be valid; • provide feedback: give a pupil information of his success and failure in studying; give a teacher information of the achieved purposes; • be a form of pupil encouraging but not a form of punishment; • promoteformationanddevelopmentofstudents`self-esteem.

  6. In 1990- es, teachers started realizing shortcomings of the existed knoledge evaluation system and in different educational institutions of Russia new approaches to evaluation of students cognitive activity were tested. • The main idea was in the transmission from 5-point to many point system as in other foreign countries.

  7. Modern world evaluation system • In the majority of world countries there is a • wider mark scale from 6 in Poland to 100 point in Japan. Lithuania, Moldavia, Byelorussiausea 10 pointevaluationsystem. • InGreatBritaintheyhaveaverbalevaluationofpupil`sactivity. Itgivesanopportunitytopresentadetailedcharacteristicofapupil. • The majority of colleges and secondary schools in the USA use a literal system to assess pupil`s progress in study. In the system A means “excellent”, B- “good”, C – “satisfactory”, D – “poor”, F – “failure”.

  8. As far as I could understand, the relevance of the problem of learning results evaluation is associated in recent years with the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard at primary and secondary school. • Psychologists, teachers and, of course, we, students, consider that in new conditions the outdated evaluation system should be reformed because it has drawbacks:

  9. Drawbacks of 5-point system Frommypointofview, themaindrawbackofthecurrent5-pointsystemisthatthemarkbecomespupil`saim,t.i. “five” doesn`t always represent excellent knowledge. When our teacher gives us “4+”we ask “5 -“ , realizing that in this case the teacher will put only 5 in the register. Besides, the price of “five” is different at different teachers.

  10. There were different ideas of how to reform the system. But from psychologists and teachers` point of view 10 point system is the most proper one because it will allow teachers to evaluate the virtual knowledge level of pupils.

  11. Thecorrelationof 10-point scaleandthetraditionalscaleofmarks 10-point system Traditional • 10 • 9 • 8 • 7 • 6 • 5 • 4 • 3 • 2 • 1 • 5 • 5 • 4 • 4 • 4 • 3 • 3 • 3 • poor • poor

  12. Conclusion I think modern education, teachers` tries to start a new system of knowledge evaluation will encourage scientists to develop new criteria for evaluation of students `s knowledge.

  13. Thank you for your attention

More Related