Evaluation of land model simulations across multiple sites and multiple models:
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 18

Evaluation of land model simulations across multiple sites and multiple models: Results from the NACP site-level synthesis effort PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 51 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Evaluation of land model simulations across multiple sites and multiple models: Results from the NACP site-level synthesis effort. Peter Thornton 1 , Gautam Bisht 1 , Dan Ricciuto 1 , NACP Site-Level Synthesis Participants

Download Presentation

Evaluation of land model simulations across multiple sites and multiple models: Results from the NACP site-level synthesis effort

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Evaluation of land model simulations across multiple sites and multiple models:Results from the NACP site-level synthesis effort

Peter Thornton1, Gautam Bisht1, Dan Ricciuto1, NACP Site-Level Synthesis Participants

1 Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division and ORNL Climate Change Science Institute


Sponsors

  • NASA Terrestrial Ecology Program

  • DOE, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, Climate and Environmental Sciences Division, Terrestrial Ecosystem Science Program


Premise

  • Models can and should serve as tools for the integration and synthesis of our best understanding and knowledge

  • Models can and should provide testable (falsifiable) hypotheses

  • Through model-data synthesis efforts, those hypotheses can and should be tested, and discarded or improved when confidence is shown to be low


Analysis setting

  • Subset of sites and models from full NACP site-level synthesis effort

  • Forest sites (evergreen and deciduous)

  • Range of climates

  • Models that include diurnal cycle

  • Carbon, sensible heat, latent heat fluxes

  • Diurnal cycle, seasonal cycle, interannual variability, long-term mean

  • Influence of steady-state vs. transient forcings


CAN-IBIS

CNCLASS

CLM-CN

ECOSYS

ED2

ISOLSM

LOTEC

ORCHIDEE

SIB

SIBCASA

SSIB2

TECO

CA-Ca1 Campbell River

CA-Oas Old aspen

CA-Obs Old black spruce

CA-Ojp Old jack pine

CA-Qfo Mature black spruce

CA-TP4 Turkey Point

US-Dk3 Duke Forest pine

US-Ha1 Harvard Forest main

US-Ho1 Howland main

US-Me2 Metolius intermediate

US-MOz Missouri Ozark

US-NR1 Niwot Ridge

US-UMB U Michigan Bio Stn

12 Models and 13 Sites


Diurnal cycle of GPP: US-Dk3

Mean diurnal cycle for June-July-August, y-axis units = umol/m2/s, x-axis is half-hour time step. Results from steady-state simulations


Diurnal cycle of GPP: CA-Obs


Diurnal cycle of GPP: US-UMB


Diurnal cycle of NEE: CA-Oas


Diurnal cycle of NEE: US-Ha1


Diurnal cycle of NEE: US-Dk3


Diurnal cycle of NEE: CLM-CN


Seasonal cycle of CLM-CN: US-Ha1


Findings: 1

  • Time-scale of N-limitation mechanism in CLM-CN is wrong.

    • Evident at both diurnal and seasonal

    • Original hypothesis that plants respond to N availability on sub-daily time scale should be rejected

    • Introducing new mechanism to buffer N availability in time


Findings: 2

  • Evaluation of LE suggests that current basis for estimation of stomatal conductance in CLM-CN is reasonable

    • This result should be revisited once new N storage mechanism is added


Findings: 3

  • CLM-CN is very sensitive to fine root : leaf allocation patterns

    • Difficult measurement

    • Likely candidate parameter for data assimilation

    • Evidence emerging from global-scale studies and comparison to root turnover data that model fine root longevity needs to be modified

  • Other models sensitive to this as well?


Findings: 4 (underway)

  • Introducing transient forcing (disturbance, rising atmospheric CO2, changing N deposition) seems to improve estimate of decadal-scale NEE

    • Doesn’t seem to change conclusions obtained from steady-state simulations

    • This is the most critical flux for evaluation of long-term climate-carbon cycle feedbacks


Conclusions

  • Approach has proved very useful in identifying strengths and weaknesses in CLM-CN

  • This kind of critical evaluation across multiple models provides a path forward for improved future model generations

  • Improving modelers’ ability to know what to ask for from observationalists and experimentalists.


  • Login