1 / 22

The eSafety Initiative and the ARTEMIS Technology Platform

ICTs In Automotive Industry, Košice – Slovakia, 10 May 2006. The eSafety Initiative and the ARTEMIS Technology Platform. Rosalie Zobel Director Directorate G - Components and Systems European Commission Directorate General Information Society and Media. Outline.

solana
Download Presentation

The eSafety Initiative and the ARTEMIS Technology Platform

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ICTs In Automotive Industry, Košice – Slovakia, 10 May 2006 The eSafety Initiative and the ARTEMIS Technology Platform Rosalie Zobel Director Directorate G - Components and Systems European CommissionDirectorate General Information Society and Media

  2. Outline • eSafety Initiative: a multi-stakeholder platform • Intelligent Car Initiative • ARTEMIS: a Technology Platform in Embedded Systems

  3. Trends • Demand for transport will continue to grow: • + 55% for goods • + 36% for people in the period 2000 - 2020 • Road accidents in Europe cause 40.000 fatalities and 170.000 injuries, at a estimated cost of 160 €B, or 2% of BNP • European automotive industry produced some 17 million vehicles/year, with some 2 million people employed • Automotive has the industrial sector with the highest level of RTD investment versus turnover • ICT is the main driver for innovation • The share of electronic systems, some 16% today, will further increase to about 25% by 2010

  4. The eSafety Initiative TheeSafety Initiative was launched in 2002 as a joint initiative of the European Commission, industry and other stakeholders. • accelerate the development, deployment and use of Intelligent Integrated Safety Systems that use Information and Communication Technologies (ITC) in intelligent solutions, in order to increase road safety and reduce the number of accidents on Europe's roads. • Forum Plenary:Platform for consensus among stakeholders • High-Level Meetingswith Industry and Member States defining strategy • Working Groups:Solution-oriented, reporting to the Forum

  5. The eSafety Forum • Established in 2003 (more than 150 members representing all road safety stakeholders • Aims at removing the bottlenecks to market implementation through consensus building among stakeholders and recommendations to the Member States and the EU • There are eleven industry-led Working Groups that work on priority topics. It has produced a consistent number of valuable reports • The Forum will ensure the links with parallel and complementary activities in the domain of intelligent transport systems.

  6. eSafety Forum: The Active WGs 2006 Plenary Sessions HL Meetings Active New Steering Committee Chair: A. Vits – EC eSafety Support eCall Driving Group Chairs:M. Nielsen – ERTICOW. Reinhardt – ACEA Research and Technological Development WG Chairs:U. Palmqvist – Eucar G. Pellischek - CLEPA International Cooperation WG Chair:J. Bangsgaard - ERTICO Communications WG Chair:U. Daniel, Bosch User Outreach WG Chair:J. Grill – AIT/FIA Service Oriented Architectures Chairs: <TBC> Implementation Road Map Chairs:H-J Mäurer – DEKRAProf. R. Kulmala – VTT

  7. i2010 & the Intelligent Car Initiative On June 1, 2005 the Commission adopted the initiative “i2010: European Information Society 2010 for growth and employment” The Intelligent Car is one of the i2010 Flagship Initiatives. The objective is to improve the quality of the living environment by supporting ICT solutions for safer, smarter and cleaner mobility of people and goods. Intelligent Car Smarter improve efficiency and safety. Cleaner contributing to reduce polluting emissions … addressing environmental and safety issues arising from increased road use Safer prevent and mitigate the impact of accidents.

  8. Intelligent Car Initiative: Challenges • Congestion • Costs amount to 50 billion €/ year • 10 % of the Road network is affected daily by traffic jams • 2. Energy Efficiency & Emissions • Road transport consumed 83% of the energy consumed by the whole transport sector 85% of the total CO2 transport emissions • 3. Safety • still over 40.000 fatalities and 1.4 million accidents in the EU cost represent 2% of the EU GDP • Human error is involved in almost 93% of accidents

  9. Intelligent Car: Objectives • Objectives of the Intelligent Car Initiative • Coordinate and support the work of relevant stakeholders, citizens, Member States and the Industry • Support research and development in the area of smarter, cleaner and safer vehicles and facilitate the take-up and use of research results • Create awareness of ICT based solutions to stimulate user’s demand for these systems and create socio-economic acceptance

  10. Intelligent Car: Structure The i2010 Intelligent Car Initiative will build on the work of the eSafety initiative and follow a three – pillar approach: (1) The eSafety Initiative and the (2) RTD in Information and Communications Technologies (3) Awareness raising Actions Intelligent Car Initiative Awareness Raising Actions The eSafety Forum RTD in ICTs FP5, FP6, FP7 Raising Awareness of ICT for smarter, safer and cleaner vehicles

  11. 2nd Pillar: The Research Programme FP7 ICT for Mobility Main action lines: • Enhance performance of Active Safety Systems • Further step in the development of truly Cooperative Systems (vehicle-vehicle, vehicle-road) • Info-mobility services for persons and goods – a new step forward • Field operational tests: Share objective data between key stakeholders: industry-operators-MS

  12. Third Pillar: Awareness Actions The awareness pillar of the Intelligent Car Initiative will promote, active information dissemination to a wide audience: • To raise drivers and policy maker’s knowledge about the potential of intelligent vehicle systems • To stimulate user’s demand and create socio-economic acceptance • To facilitate the deployment of mature technologies and systems in the initial phase of market penetration • To encourage stakeholders initiatives supporting i2010

  13. Launching of the Intelligent Car Initiative Held in Brussels’ Autoworld Museum on 23 February 2006 • Commissioner Reding presented the Communication on the Intelligent Car Initiative • display of • 24 “intelligent” vehicles equipped with safety features • eight simulators illustrating the way such safety devices function • more than 250 stakeholders • 85 journalists & camera teams • 400 registered

  14. 14,000 millions 12,000 10,000 world population microprocessors+ 8,000 PCs 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 1980 1990 2000 Embedded systems: Facts & figures Strong growth: • Annual growth rate: 10 % • A smart phone contains millions of lines of code • 18 of top 25 EU companies rely on embedded systems; they spend € 50 bn annually in R&D By 2010: • Number of embedded components expected to grow to 16 billion worldwide • Electronics account for up to 40% of a vehicle’s value

  15. Strategic Priority Embedded Systems within IST/FP6 • 58 M€ funding in Call 2 and 75 M€ in Call 5; also ES elsewhere in IST • ICT cluster projects within EUREKA • ITEA (1999-2007): software-intensive systems; 3.2 B€ costs • MEDEA+ (2001-2008): systems on silicon; 4.0 B€ costs • National/regional programmes • e.g. in NL: PROGRESS, ESI R&D Support is Fragmented • EU Competitiveness Council and EUREKA Ministers call for closer cooperation and more synergy between FP and EUREKA • Instrumental role forETPs, JTIs 17

  16. Partners PARADES ARTEMIS: Advanced Research & Technologyin embedded intelligence & systems Aim and scope • To develop & drive a joint European strategy in Embedded Systems • R&D, educational and structural issues addressed • To align fragmented R&D efforts along a common strategic agenda at European level • To benchmark & link with relevant initiatives outside Europe http://www.cordis.lu/ist/artemis/ 8 of the 25 top- ranked European companies aremembers in ARTEMIS … … they spend annually € 25 bn in R&D

  17. Artemis Proposed Synergetic Approach ARTEMIS Industry-driven long-term vision Common pan-European SRA Overall coordination and policy alignment in ERA Joint monitoring of projects and impact assessment of programmes FP7 - regular instruments • Via normal Calls for Proposals FP7 • Focus on upstream part of SRA • RTD cooperation in ICT theme • Frontier research via ERC • Marie Curie actions for training and mobility of researchers • Research infrastructures for Centres of Excellence Joint Technology Initiative • Long-term industry-led PPP • Focus on downstream part of SRA • RTD cooperation in ITEA/MEDEA-like programme and other transnational projects • In-kind industry commitment (staff) • EU contribution via common legal structure of Member States involved Synergy 19

  18. ARTEMIS Strategy • Common objectives • Sustainability • Design efficiency • Ease of use • High added value • Time-to-market • Modularity • Safety/security • Robustness • Competitiveness • Innovation • Cost reduction • Interoperability

  19. Annual conference Steering Board Mirror Group of Public Authorities Secretariat Executive Board Office WG Support WG Strategic Agenda WG Innovation Environment WG Research Infrastructure WG Funding Strategy Artemis Governance Rules of Procedure and Terms of Reference ensure openness, transparency and dissemination

  20. EU contribution ARTEMIS Suggested Funding Scheme MS1 10 MS2 3 MS3 15 MS4 12 MS5 10 MS6 45 MS7 5 National Contributions Transnational Project 22

  21. ARTEMIS: Towards a JTI • Likely prerequisites for EU contribution • Concrete JTI objectives • Adherence to common pan-European ARTEMIS SRA by all stakeholders • Open, transparent and effective governance • Earmarked (multi-annual) budgets in participating States and industrial commitment • Harmonised/synchronised funding procedures between States • Legal structure, e.g. EEIG of national Public Authorities, able to receive and manage funding from the Community • Potential benefits • Creates the critical mass needed to pursue the common ARTEMIS objectives • Gives incentive for Member States to provide more and better aligned funding • Exploits strengths of EUREKA and helps overcoming its weaknesses • Avoids national duplication of international programmes / procedures

  22. Thank You For Your Attention

More Related