1 / 16

Payers and Providers Collaborate for Success In Age of Reform

Payers and Providers Collaborate for Success In Age of Reform. March 10, 2011. The New Realty. Need to bend the cost curve Increased attention to quality metrics Reimbursement models that incent patients and providers to move toward both lower cost and higher quality.

sofia
Download Presentation

Payers and Providers Collaborate for Success In Age of Reform

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Payers and Providers Collaborate for SuccessIn Age of Reform March 10, 2011

  2. The New Realty • Need to bend the cost curve • Increased attention to quality metrics • Reimbursement models that incent patients and providers to move toward both lower cost and higher quality

  3. Cost Curve – How do you Bend It? • Reduced payment per service, reduced trend/annual rate increases • More efficient use of medically necessary services • Elimination of unnecessary services • Fewer complications/higher cost services due to improved quality and more coordinated care

  4. Achievable? With Collaboration • Shared savings • Resources/support to initiate and maintain • Investment in the tools to accomplish • Ongoing monitoring and sharing of data • Added value to provider, payer and employer/patient

  5. Key Players – How to Engage? • Payers - • Achieve a savings they can pass on to their customers, investors, providers • Hit metrics they can market – utilization, quality, and cost metrics • Providers - • Deliver the tools to better manage utilization • Demonstrate willingness to invest in changes that will ultimately result in savings • Share in savings

  6. Coming Together – How? • Win-Win Structures • Agreement on Goals that Benefit All • Lower cost BEFORE lower reimbursement • Improve quality BEFORE increasing reimbursement • Common set of metrics and attainable goals • Data everyone can trust/rely on • Meaningful shared savings – dollars significant enough to generate/maintain interest

  7. Options for Collaboration • Pay for Performance/Gainsharing • Enhanced, data driven, primary care initiatives • Global risk, bundled payments and other alternative financial arrangements

  8. Pay for Performance/Gainsharing Why? • Simple Method to Align and Achieve Physician and Hospital (and Payer) Goals • Engages physicians, payments to docs within the year, collaboration/improvements begin immediately • Not complicated - data is readily available & accepted as valid • Flexible - adapt to special needs of hospital • Perfect tool for any start up ACO and other “risk” entities

  9. Pay for Performance/Gainsharing • Many efforts underway aimed at efficiency and quality improvements - BUT • Getting the attention and involvement needed from physicians? • Physicians have a true understanding of their role in achieving the goals – how to hit the benchmarks? • Providers getting the right kind of data, on a regular basis, that give direction on behavior changes? Usually Not…..

  10. Continuum Health PartnersPay for Performance Overview • 2006 Managed Care, 2008 Medicare demo • Designed to compensate Physicians who improve quality andimplement more efficient inpatient practice patterns • Savings shared with physicians who move toward or hit benchmarks • Upside bonus only, based on individual performance • No change in current billing process or payment (and loss of income factor included in bonus)

  11. CHP Pay for Performance Basic Framework All cases severity adjusted to 4 levels using APR-DRGs to account for ‘sicker’ patients. Benchmarks established using CHP actual experience – average cost of the top 25th percentile (lowest cost) performers. Monies to pay bonus come from hospital savings generated by improvements in efficiency. No savings - no bonuses paid out. Payments withheld from physicians who do not meet quality standards (Core Measures, Infection indicators, Readmission rates, medical record completion, patient complaints etc)

  12. 12

  13. Successful Partnership Achieved • Preliminary Results – Significant cost reductions and improved quality • Shrinking gap between bottom 75th percentile and top 25th percentile • Greater understanding of data and interest in clinical guidelines – moving toward standardization of care • Incentives more closely aligned

  14. Core Measure Trends

  15. Additional Initiatives • Enhanced, comprehensive data distribution among providers • Primary care/patient focused medical home • Stratification of high risk patients with directed case management • Medical benefit redesign to incent greater compliance • Directing patients toward provider networks sharing data/managing patients

More Related