1 / 21

Content Trajectories, Instructional Materials, and Curriculum Decisions

Content Trajectories, Instructional Materials, and Curriculum Decisions. PROM/SE Ohio Mathematics Associates Institute Spring 2005. Welcome Investigations & Everyday Math Users. Please sit with no more than 6 people at a table. There should only be one person from each district at a table.

slopez
Download Presentation

Content Trajectories, Instructional Materials, and Curriculum Decisions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Content Trajectories, Instructional Materials, and Curriculum Decisions PROM/SE Ohio Mathematics Associates Institute Spring 2005

  2. WelcomeInvestigations & Everyday Math Users • Please sit with no more than 6 people at a table. • There should only be one person from each district at a table. PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute

  3. Agenda for K-5 • Identifying “Big Ideas” Trajectories for Fractions: • Concepts, Comparing, Ordering, and Equivalence • Instructional Materials and Content Trajectories • Lunch--12:00 p.m. • Mapping Benchmarks & Indicators to Instructional Materials • Reflections & Next Steps PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute

  4. Identifying the “Big Ideas” Trajectory for Fractions Individually • Make a concept map for the fractions: • concepts, comparing, ordering, and equivalence In teams • Look across the maps: • Describe similarities and differences. • What might account for the differences? PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute

  5. Looking Across Our Maps for “Big Ideas” • Concepts • Part to whole • Parts of sets • Numerator and denominator • Equal parts • Models: measurement, linear, area, volume • Representations: words , picture, number, physical objects • Relationships between numerator & denominator • Comparing • Benchmark fractions, 1/2, 1/4, … • Greater than one, less than one • Comparing two fractions • Symbols, >, <, = PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute

  6. More of Our Big Ideas • Ordering • Numberline • Estimation closer to 0, 1/2, 1 • Greatest to least • Improper fractions & mixed numbers • More than two fractions • Equivalence • Factors & multiples • Same value • Multiplying by forms of 1 (e.g., 2/2, 3/3) to obtain equivalent fraction • Simplest form/ lowest terms PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute

  7. BREAK • Place posters on wall • 10:15 to 10:30 • After break, do a gallery walk to examine different posters. • What did you notice that was interesting or unique? • How are the sequences similar? How are they different? • Sit by curriculum programs • Mixed grade level groups (K-6) • Different districts represented PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute

  8. Characteristics of a Coherent Mathematical Trajectory • Every component has a mathematical reason for being included • Designed with awareness of students’ understandings and misunderstandings • Sequence developed with clear sense of developmental levels • Ideas build on each other • Mathematical sequence and connections are defensible • Ideas become increasingly more sophisticated Handout #1 PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute

  9. Reflecting on “Big Ideas” Trajectories In teams • Create a poster that outlines your content trajectory • What models should be used to represent fractions • Parts of a unit whole • Parts of a set • Location on a number line • Division of whole numbers • When should equal parts be introduced? Fraction notation? • Does your trajectory include fractions greater than one? • When should equivalence of fractions be introduced? Worksheet #1 PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute

  10. Low Cognitive Demand • Tasks rely heavily on memorization or following a routine procedure • Require little thinking or reasoning • Focused on correct answers • Explanations focus solely on how a procedure was used and lack a connection to concepts or meaning Handout #2 PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute

  11. Moderate Cognitive Demand • Tasks require several different processes and relate two or more mathematical concepts (e.g., multi-step problems) • Procedures are connected to underlying concepts and meanings and cannot just be followed mindlessly • Students are asked to make connections among representations and may be asked to give some explanations. PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute

  12. High Cognitive Demand • Tasks require significant analysis and reasoning • Students have to put ideas together in ways they have not seen before in a lesson or in ways that make connections to other previously learned mathematical concepts • There is no predictable rehearsed approach suggested by the task or example Handout #2 PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute

  13. Elementary Task Set Individually • Solve the problems in the set • Sort the tasks by levels of cognitive demand • Record the task number and indicate the level (low, moderate, or high) on Worksheet 2A In Teams • Discuss ways of reasoning on a few problems of interest • Share your classifications • Discuss any differences and why they may have occurred • Try to resolve any disagreements about levels PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute

  14. Instructional Materials & Content Trajectories Individually or in Pairs • Identify and record the core mathematical knowledge by lesson on Worksheet 2C • Indicate the developmental level (I, D, S, A)--see worksheet 2B • Indicate the cognitive demand for each lesson (low, moderate, high) Worksheet 2B PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute

  15. Instructional Materials Fraction Summary Table Worksheet 2C PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute

  16. Summary of Instructional Materials Review As a team • What are some areas your materials handled well? • Describe any gaps that you identified. • Identify overlaps and decide upon the importance. • What mathematical content seems to be irrelevant and doesn’t appear to fit? • What issues did you find with developmental levels? • What issues emerged regarding the cognitive demands of tasks? PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute

  17. Mapping to Benchmarks & Indicators • Identify the appropriate Benchmark or Indicator for each idea you listed on Worksheet 2C • Code indicators • Black - at expected grade level • Red - expected at higher grade • Blue - expected at lower grade • Yellow - not addressed at all in instructional materials • Which indicators occur in multiple grade levels? Why? • Where do gaps exist and how might you address them? Worksheet 3a PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute

  18. Building New Tasks from Old • Select 2-3 tasks/problems from your instructional materials that you classified as low cognitive demand tasks. • Identify the mathematics in the task/problem and describe how it relates to the mathematical goals of the lesson. • Modify the problem so that is has a moderate or high cognitive demand • Record problem on chart paper to post • Describe how the revised task pushes students thinking. PROM/SE Ohio 2005 Spring Mathematics Associates Institute

More Related