OOI Program Update
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 29

OOI Program Update Tim Cowles PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 64 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

OOI Program Update Tim Cowles. Design Elements 4 Global sites 3 Regional cabled sites in the NE Pacific 2 Coastal arrays: Mid-Atlantic Pioneer Array, PNW Endurance Array Each scale incorporates mobile assets

Download Presentation

OOI Program Update Tim Cowles

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Ooi program update tim cowles

OOI Program UpdateTim Cowles


Ooi program update tim cowles

Design Elements

4 Global sites

3 Regional cabled sites in the NE Pacific

2 Coastal arrays: Mid-Atlantic Pioneer Array, PNW Endurance Array

Each scale incorporates mobile assets

Cyberinfrastructure: enables adaptive sampling, custom observatory view, collaborative analysis

Interfaces for education users

Navy Briefing


Ooi overarching goals

OOI overarching goals

OOI has two fundamental scientific and research mandates that underpin its construction:

  • Sustained delivery of high-quality data for two to three decades;

  • Maintenance of the expandability of the infrastructure to support new capabilities.


Ooi overarching goals1

OOI overarching goals

We address those mandates by meeting the science requirements during construction, and by building in the most cost-effective approaches to operating the infrastructure.

The most cost-effective approaches include:

  • A model for the lowest possible annual operating cost

  • No compromises to science, safety, and data integrity

  • Incorporation of established change control processes, risk management process, policies for adding new science...


Gaps identified in october 2010

Gaps identified in October 2010

  • Some high-value work elements behind schedule

  • Procurement actions slower than planned

  • Still understaffed across the project even with remarkable growth since start of construction in Sept 2009

  • Weak web site and external communications

    Under pressure from NSF and OMB to show improvements in progress within next 6 months


Corrective action plan initial issues

Corrective Action Plan: Initial Issues

Four areas were the primary focal points for action

  • Weaknesses in some management structures

    • PM and Engineering – tasking and coordination

    • Subaward management

  • Gaps in staffing

  • Schedule Management -> Progress toward milestones

  • Rate of procurement across the program


Schedule replanning process

Schedule ‘replanning’ process

External specialists have been guiding a replan of the OOI schedule during the implementation of the Corrective Action Plan

  • Integrating construction and O&M into one schedule

  • Adding more granularity into the schedule to improve tracking of milestones

    Will be complete late March/early April and will become the new ‘baseline’ for the OOI


Ooi cap performance metrics

OOI CAP Performance Metrics

  • Progress assessed on

    • Staffing

    • Procurements

    • Designs, Products

  • Achieved hiring as defined in staffing plans at each IO

  • Made good progress on procurements of platforms and instruments as defined in procurement table

  • Delivered 80% of products ‘on time’ as set in the CAP milestone list

  • Progress in these areas indicates improved coordination and integrationof Project Management and Engineering


  • Cap hiring targets milestones results

    CAP: Hiring Targets, Milestones, Results

    Numbers relative to OOI staffing on September 30, 2010


    Ooi progress based on earned value

    OOI Progress based on Earned Value

    POS

    COST variance

    improving

    NEG

    SCHEDULE variance


    Coastal and global scale nodes cgsn

    Coastal and Global Scale Nodes (CGSN)

    Pioneer

    Global

    Endurance

    11


    Progress in marine design

    Progress in Marine Design

    Institutionally-Designed Platforms, Coastal Moorings

    • The In-shore Coastal Mooring test unit is complete with a preliminary detailed design of prototype and a prototype build

    • The technical drawing package is mature and a TDP drawing design package has been developed.

    • The mooring has been built and awaiting ship availability for deployment


    Ooi program update tim cowles

    Test Deployments to Evaluate Designs

    In Shore Test Mooring 2 (ISTM2): March 2011 – July 2011

    At the Endurance Array site, surface wave heights that are large fractions of water depth are a large design challenge.

    Testing: Mooring and buoy design for 25 m site.


    Ooi program update tim cowles

    Test Deployments to Evaluate Designs

    Example: In Shore Test Mooring 2 (ISTM2): March 2011 – July 2011

    Buoy (foreground) and stretch hose (background)

    Redesigned universal joint


    Progress in marine design1

    Progress in Marine Design

    Institutionally-Designed Platforms, Global Moorings

    • At-Sea Test Moorings (3) are approximately 50% complete and portions of the prototypes are under construction.

    • Test deployment is now scheduled for September 2011

      • Multiple design and build milestones over the next 6 months

      • Focused IO and PMO attention on work and relative progress


    Technical progress deployments will test designs

    Technical Progress: Deployments will test designs

    At Sea Test 2 (AST2): Sept 2011 – April 2012

    At the Pioneer Array site

    Coastal Surface Mooring (CSM)

    Coastal Profiler Mooring (CPM)

    will be tested in 500 m of water.

    Pioneer Array


    Test deployments to evaluate designs

    Test Deployments to Evaluate Designs

    At Sea Test 2 (AST2): September 2011 – April 2012

    Seaward of the Pioneer Array site,

    a global hybrid profiler mooring

    to be tested in 2,500 m of water.

    Concerns about global surface profiler and operations with compound mooring deployment/recovery to be addressed.

    Hybrid profiler mooring


    At sea test 2 ast2 timeline

    At Sea Test 2 (AST2) TimeLine

    AST2 Cruise

    Sept 22, 2011

    AST2 Design

    AST2 Manufacture and Build

    AST2 Integration

    Burn-in

    In the Water

    (thru April 2012)


    Progress in marine design regional

    Progress in Marine Design (Regional)

    Approximately half of the Regional System technical designs are on scheduleare under the Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract with L3-MariPro. Other items are within the schedule float and should not delay any deployments.

    The non-L3 major infrastructure pieces of the cable system have been specified and contracted

    • The physical hard connection point of presence (POP)

    • Telecommunication backbone service to the shore station

    • The physical shore station

    • Conduits from the shore station to the shore landing manholes


    Ooi program update tim cowles

    Horizontal Directional Drilling at Pacific City, Oregon


    Ooi program update tim cowles

    Survey to determine cable route in 2010

    Black smoker in the ASHES Hydrothermal Field imaged during a detailed bathymetric and video survey of the area as a potential node site for the OOI Regional Cabled Observatory.

    An octopus lounges on a basalt flow at a water depth of ~1520 m within the caldera of Axial Volcano.


    Ooi program update tim cowles

    Test of Secondary Infrastructure support

    A half-scale model of a potential frame design is lowered off the R/V Thompson for a one-year deployment at Southern Hydrate Ridge using Medea and Jason. The frame is also being tested to see how different materials react to biofouling during long-duration deployments.


    Cyberinfrastructure technical progress

    CyberInfrastructure Technical Progress

    Architecture of Infrastructure and R1

    • Good progress on messaging and computational features

    • Over 100 Enterprise Architecture drawings complete

      • Common Operating Infrastructure

      • Common Execution Infrastructure

      • Data Management

      • External Observatory Integration

      • Sensing and Acquisition

        User Interface design

    • 10 workflows defined covering 13 screens and 84 panels

      • (a screen is made up of panels)


    Ci technical progress

    CI Technical Progress

    Software Detailed Design/Coding Release 1

    • Screen Design, wire frames for release 1 completed

    • Full implementation in R1 in June 2011

    • Release 1 provides foundational code for ingestion and distribution of external data


    Ci technical progress1

    CI Technical Progress

    Hardware and Network Systems

    • The San Diego Engineering Center is operational

    • Designs and BoMs for the Portland, Seattle, and Woods Hole cyberPoPs are complete

    • Point of Presence (POP) hardware procurement re-planned for April for Portland and Seattle and later 2011 for Woods Hole

      The specification, Statement of Work, and RFP for the national backbone are undergoing contract review


    Ooi changes since oct 2010

    OOI changes since Oct 2010

    Organizational changes within OOI Project Office

    • Senior Project Scientist to begin April 25 – Steve Ackleson

    • OOI Director of Communications – Kerry Beck

    • Engaged experienced contractors to assist with O&M while completing search for new O&M Manager

    • new Deputy Program Manager – Greg Settle


    Ooi changes since oct 20101

    OOI changes since Oct 2010

    Organizational changes at Implementing Organizations

    • More details than can be summarized here!


    Action plan

    Action Plan

    Our adjustments as we approach the Year 2 review

    • Review and analysis of technical progress

    • Implement the new schedule

    • Assessment vulnerabilities to continued progress

      • Take corrective steps as needed

    • Clarify data products and data sampling

    • Enhance science engagement through improved communications

    • Improve budgetary evaluations of long-term operational expenses


    Concerns

    Concerns

    • Pace of work is intense and the team is working too many hours. Burn-out is a primary concern.

    • Unsettled budgetary environment has not yet complicated cash flow, but……stay tuned

    • Clarifying pathways for science engagement


  • Login