- 101 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Today

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement
- More practical exercises

- Each and every measurement or evaluation comes with an associated uncertainty on its value
- Different philosophies leading to the same approach:
- A true value does not exists, or
- A true value exists but is unknown
Use statistical distributions of probabilityto describe the measurement value

Uncertainty can be assessed:

- By means of experienced evaluation (historical data, datasheet analysis, previous experienceâ€¦) [B CATEGORY] hypothetical PDF
- By means of repeated measurements on the same measurand (statistical analysis of results) [A CATEGORY] measured PDF
- By means of propagation of other uncertainties in the case of an indirect measurement [combined uncertainty] PDF propagation

SIMPLIFIED FORM:

- To be used whenever parameters are actually independents(no correlated uncertainties)

- IDENTIFY THE DATA REDUCTION EQUATION-check for simplified approach applicability
- IDENTIFY EVERY PARAMETER INVOLVED-category, uncertainty, influence coefficient
- COMPUTE THE RESULT ESTIMATED VALUE
- COMPUTE IS COMBINED UNCERTAINTY-propagate uncertainties
- COMPUTE EXTENDED UNCERTAINTY-select an appropriate coverage factor for the confidence level required
- WRITE THE RESULT IN THE CORRECT FORM
G=704Â±38 MPa (P=99%) or G=704Â±38 MPa (k=2.58) or G=704 MPa U99% (G)=38 MPa

UMF: Uncertainty Magnification Factor

- Tells us how much the input uncertainty is magnified by the data reduction equation
- DEPENDS ONLY ON THE EQUATION CHOSEN
- Useful for a preliminar analysis when buying transducer for a particular task, identifying the most critical ones (UMF>1) or the less critical ones (UMF<1)

UPC: Uncertainty Percentage Contribution

- Tells us which fraction of the combined uncertainty depends on the input uncertainty
- Accounts not only for the equation, but also for the uncertainties actually involved.
- Useful for finding which measurements need to be improved

Using a surveyorâ€™s wheel (300mm diameter, 100 division) and one inclinometer (one tenth of grade step), a building is measured with the following values:

Ï‘1=61.5Â° Ï‘2=-8.0Â° L=15m

h1 =Ltg|Ï‘1|

h2 =Ltg|Ï‘2|

H=h1+h2

H=L(tg|Ï‘1|+tg|Ï‘2|)

Report the height of the building as a measurement result, using an extended uncertainty with a confidence level of 95%

H

Ï‘1

Ï‘2

L

H=29.73 Â± 0.14 m (k=1.96)

- Data Reduction Equation:H=L(tg|Ï‘1|+tg|Ï‘2|)
- Parameters involved:-L - distance â€“ B category uncertainty- Ï‘1 â€“ angle â€“ B category uncertainty- Ï‘2 â€“ angle â€“ B category uncertainty

- Parametersinvolved: L=15m[m] B categoryuncertaintymeasuredusing a surveyorâ€™s wheel(300mm diameter, 100 division)1 division=p*300mm/100=9.4mm=0.0094mweâ€™ll assume a uniformdistributionwithhalf-widhta equalto the leastdivision

Shouldhavebeenhalf-widthaequaltohalfof the leastdivision, but, as a ruleofthumb, is common todouble the contributionif the measurementisrough!

a

x

- Parameters involved: Ï‘1=61.5Â°=1.073rad[rad] B category uncertaintymeasured using a clinometer(1/10 grade division)1 division=0.1Â°=0.0017rad weâ€™ll assume a uniform distribution with half-widht a equal to the least division
- The same goes for Ï‘2=-8Â°=-0.140rad

a

x

- InfluenceCoefficients
=2.0=66 m/rad=15 m/rad

- COMBINED UNCERTAINTY,EXTENDED UNCERTAINTY and MEASUREMENTS RESULTS
- H=29.73m U95%(H)=0.14mH=29.73 Â± 0.14m (k=1.96)H=29.73 Â± 0.14m (P=95%)
- Critical Analysis: UMF, UPC

- Each and every measurement or evaluation comes with an associated uncertainty on its value
- Different philosophies leading to the same approach:
- A true value does not exists, or
- A true value exists but is unknown
Use statistical distributions of probabilityto describe the measurement value

- Two measurement results are compatible (at a given level of confidence) whereas their confidence intervals overlap.
E.g.speed of my car using a GPS signal:72Â±1km/h (P=95%)speed of my car using its speedometer:75Â±7km/h (P=95%)speed of my car measured by police:80Â±8km/h (P=95%)

are the three measurement results referring to the same measurand? Are they COMPATIBLE?

Yes, they are compatible, as there is an interval in common among the three confidence levels at 95%

At 95% of confidence level we cannot say that the three measurement result are different.

One further example:a force control system for a clamping device indicates a value ofF=89N with a tolerance 95% given of 1Nthe same clamping force is measured repeatedly using a load cell, with the following results:F={89,91,90,92,89,89,91} Nare the two results COMPATIBLE at 99%?

One further example:F=89N with a tolerance 95% given of 1N1N extended uncertainty at 95%, supposing a normal distribution we can compute the standard uncertainty (k=1) by dividing for k95%=1.96 => u(F)=0.51 N => U99%(F)=k99%u(F)=2.58x0.51 N=1.3 Nconfidence interval: {87.7 N â€“ 90.3 N}

repeated measurements F={89,91,90,92,89,89,91} Nmean â€“ F=90.14 N standard deviation - Ïƒ=1.215 Nnumber of samples â€“ n=7 => v=n-1=6 degrees of freedomThe student distribution can be assumed to extend uncertainty from repeated meas. using k=t99%,v=3.71 => U99%(F)= 1.7 Nconfidence interval: {88.4 N â€“ 91.8 N}

YES, the values are compatible at 99% confidence:the intervals overlap between 88.4 N and 90.3 N

We were asked to measure the load applied in a PIN-DISK contact during friction tests. The load is given by an hydraulic actuator using a pressure multiplier as shown.

Knowing the diameters shown were measured using 1/20 calipers, and considering the working pressures shown, which transducer is suitable for the task (considering the same price for both)?

Which uncertainty could be associated to the load measured?

Transducer A: 300 kPa range, overall uncertainty 2%FS Transducer B: 10 MPa range, overall uncertainty 1%FS

d2=200mm

d1=40mm

d0=10mm

p2â‰ˆ200kPa

p1=p2 (d2/d1)Â²

Hypothesis A:

- use the transducer A to measure p2 with an uncertainty of 6kPa
Hypothesis B:-use the transducer B to measure p1 with an uncertainty of 100kPa

The best optionishypothesis B, asitsuncertaintyissmallerthan the other.

Butwhatif the relative uncertaintyof A was 1%FS?