1 / 14

Some Relevant Technical Issues on Consistent Coal Quality Asim Chowdhuri &

Some Relevant Technical Issues on Consistent Coal Quality Asim Chowdhuri & Dr Kalyan Sen, CFRI, 2003. Approach towards Quality Improvement & Supply of Consistent Quality. Proper QMS Technological options for Quality enhancement Modification of Standards

sinjin
Download Presentation

Some Relevant Technical Issues on Consistent Coal Quality Asim Chowdhuri &

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Some RelevantTechnical IssuesonConsistent Coal Quality Asim Chowdhuri & Dr Kalyan Sen, CFRI, 2003

  2. Approach towards Quality Improvement & Supply of Consistent Quality • Proper QMS • Technological options for Quality enhancement • Modification of Standards • Revision of Coal Categorisation

  3. Existing Quality Monitoring System • Manual sampling • Wagon top sampling • Mechanical sampling • Constraints • Handling of large sized coal

  4. Quality Monitoring of Coal Problems of Wagon top sampling • Sampling sites • Inadequate facility - sampling, preparation & analysis • Insufficient time, manpower, etc. • Results sampling from top only How it affects final results • Less reliable due to higher errors • Disputes between supplier & consumer • Nation being the ultimate looser

  5. Quality Monitoring of Coal Problems of Mechanical Sampling(200mm sized coal) Constraints • Higher Bias leading to disputes • High Spillage • Frequent Chute choking • Rapid wear & Tear • High Capital investment & Maintenance costs

  6. Proposed Modification in SamplingProcedure • Supply of lower size coals (50 mm or below)and inclusion of AMS • Benefits • More reliable quality data • Less Capital investment • Low maintenance cost • in case of temporary failure of AMS theadvantage would be for switching over towagon top sampling with better precisionthan that for higher sized coals

  7. Identified Technological Optionsfor Coal Quality Upgradation • Globally accepted Options for better economicsand less environmental pollution • Mine planning • Dry deshaling at Pit heads • Judicious blending • Wet beneficiation

  8. Identified Technological Optionsfor Coal Quality Upgradation Present rider: ash level of 34% Proposed: The degree of washing should be limited to that density of cut at which the final product is free from any particle of ash higher than 50-55%. Of course, this often leads to overallash content level more or less 34%.

  9. Ash% reducn M % over ROM coal Level Scheme Methodology Cleans (%) I Dry benefic. Separation of stone/shale based on differential breakage potentiality 3-4 >90 Nil II Crushing, screening & coarse coal cleaning Coarse coal (13/30mm) washed & mixed with untreated fines; dewatering screens. <10 70-90 2-3% >10 <60 3-4% III Crushing, screening and total cleaning Coarser fraction washed at optimum efficiency levels: fine coal by Spiral: dewatering Technology Routes for beneficiation

  10. Proposed Modification of Standards • Adoption of ISO 13909 (Mechanical Sampling) • Adoption of ISO 9931 (for Pulverized Coal) • Reaffirmation of IS 13810 (Code for F&S) • Change in ISO 1213 -1 (a new term) • Characteristic Ash: • The ash of the particles in a closely spaced relative density fraction obtained from Float & Sink analysis

  11. Revision of Coal Categorisationfor commercial purpose • Categorisation system based on GCV (as recd. Moist. basis) & weightage on the ash • A Matrix system with closely spaced GCV & ash value. • Coal quality could be assessed by maximum ash value and lowest GCV value that will • Remove anomalies of the present system • Provide incentive for better quality • Ensure consistent quality of a consignment

More Related