- 75 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Chi-square test

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Chi-square test

FPP 28

- Nominal data is categorical with more than two categories
- Compare observed frequencies of nominal variable to hypothesized probabilities
- One categorical variable with more than two categories
- Chi-squared goodness of fit test

- Test if two nominal variables are independent
- Two categorical variables with at least one having more than two categories
- Chi-squared test of independence

- Do people admit themselves to hospitals more frequently close to their birthday?
- Data from a random sample of 200 people admitted to hospitals

- Assume there is no birthday effect, that is, people admit randomly. Then,
Pr (within 7) = = .0411 Pr (8 - 30) = = .1260 Pr (31-90) = = .3288 Pr (91+) = = .5041

- So, in a sample of 200 people, we’d expect to be in “within 7” to be in “8 - 30” to be in “31 - 90” to be in “91+”

- If admissions are random, we expect the sample frequencies and hypothesized probabilities to be similar
- But, as always, the sample frequencies are affected by chance error
- So, we need to see whether the sample frequencies could have been a plausible result from a chance error if the hypothesized probabilities are true.
- Let’s build a hypothesis test

- Hypothesis
- Claim (alternative hyp.) is admission probabilities change according to days since birthday
- Opposite of claim (null hyp.) is probabilities in accordance with random admissions.
- H0 : Pr (within 7) = .0411 Pr (8 - 30) = .1260 Pr (31-90) = .3288 Pr (91+) = .5041
- HA : probabilities different than those in H0 .

- Chi-squared test statistic

- X2 has a chi-squared distribution with degrees of freedom equal to number of categories minus 1.
- In this case, df = 4 – 1 = 3.

- To get a p-value, calculate the area under the chi-squared curve to the right of 1.397
- Using JMP, this area is 0.703. If the null hypothesis is true, there is a 70% chance of observing a value of X2 as or more extreme than 1.397
- Using the table the p-value is between 0.9 and 0.70

- The .70 is a large p-value, indicating that the difference between the observed and expected counts could well occur by random chance when the null hypothesis is true. Therefore, we cannot reject the null hypothesis. There is not enough evidence to conclude that admissions rates change according to days from birthday.

- Is birth order related to delinquency?
- Nye (1958) randomly sampled 1154 high school girls and asked if they had been “delinquent”.

- % Delinquent for each birth order status
- Based on conditional frequencies, it appears that youngest are more delinquent
- Could these sample frequencies have plausibly occurred by chance if there is no relationship between birth order and delinqeuncy

- Hypotheses
- Want to show that there is some relationship between birth order and delinquency.
- Opposite is that there is no relationship.
- H0 : birth order and delinquency are independent.
- HA : birth order and delinquency are dependent.

- Expected counts
- Under independence,
- Pr(oldest and delinquent) = Pr(oldest)*Pr(delinquent)

- Estimate Pr(oldest) as marginal frequency of oldest
- Estimate Pr(delinquent) as marginal frequency of delinquent
- Hence, estimate Pr(oldest and delinquent) as
- The expected number of oldest and delinquent, under independence, equals
- This is repeated for all the other cells in table

- Under independence,

- Expected counts
- Next we compare the observed counts with the expected to get a test statistic

- Use the X2statistic as the test statistic:

- Calculate the p-value
- X 2 has a chi-squared distribution with degrees of freedom:df = (number rows – 1) * (number columns – 1)
- In delinquency problem, df = (4 - 1) * (2 - 1) = 3.
- The area under the chi-squared curve to the right of 42.245 is less than .0001. There is only a very small chance of getting an X2as or more extreme than 42.245.

- This is a small p-value. It is unlikely we’d observe data like this if the null hypothesis is true. There does appear to be an association between delinquency and birth order.

- Requires simple random samples.
- Works best when expected frequencies in each cell are at least 5.
- Should not have zero counts
- How one specifies categories can affect results.

- What do I do when expected counts are less than 5?
- Try to get more data. Barring that, you can collapse categories.Example: Is baldness related to heart disease? (see JMP for data set)
Baldness Disease Number of people

None Yes 251

None No 331

Little Yes 165

Little No 221

Some Yes 195

Some No 185 Combine “extreme” and “much” categories

Much Yes 50 Much or extreme Yes 52

Much No 34 Much or extreme No 35

Extreme Yes 2

Extreme No 1

This changes the question slightly, since we have a new category.

- for collapsed data for baldness example
- Based on p-value, baldness and heart disease are not independent.
- We see that increasing baldness is associated with increased incidence of heart disease.