California instream transfers
Download
1 / 15

California Instream Transfers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 119 Views
  • Uploaded on

California Instream Transfers. Allan Lilly Rob Donlan Bill Hutton Andy Sawyer Nicolas Jacobs. photos: San Joaquin River Restoration Program. Basic Nature Water Rights. No private ownership of water flowing in a natural stream. (See Wat. Code, § 102.)

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' California Instream Transfers' - sibyl


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
California instream transfers
California Instream Transfers

Allan Lilly Rob Donlan Bill Hutton Andy Sawyer Nicolas Jacobs

photos: San Joaquin River Restoration Program


Basic nature water rights
Basic Nature Water Rights

  • No private ownership of water flowing in a natural stream. (See Wat. Code, § 102.)

  • But rights may be obtained to the use of water. (Id.)

  • A water right is a right to divert water for beneficial use.

  • Water rights are property rights

  • Water rights are subject to pervasive regulation, including protections for instream beneficial use.


Lux v haggin no water right protection for instream uses
Lux v. HagginNo Water Right Protection for Instream Uses

“[T]he words ‘material injury’ implies that every diminution is not any injury, and it excludes, where water is reasonably used above for irrigation, mere sentiment, or the consideration of a diminution from the natural flow so far merely as such flow pleases the eye or gratifies a taste for the beautiful.” (Lux v. Haggin (1886) 69 Cal. 255, 396.)

Henry Lux


Lux rationale undermined
Lux Rationale Undermined

“The appropriation [of water] must be for some useful or beneficial purposes . . . . (Wat. Code, § 1240.)

“The use of water for recreation and preservation and enhancement of fish and wildlife is a beneficial use of water.” (Wat. Code, § 1243 [added in 1959].)


Appropriations for instream use involving use of stored water
Appropriations for Instream UseInvolving Use of Stored Water

New Melones – photo USBR


Appropriations for instream use involving interbasin transfers
Appropriations for Instream UseInvolving Interbasin Transfers

Salton Sea – photo K. Kashmi


Lux redux no diversion no appropriation
Lux Redux: No Diversion – No Appropriation

California Trout v. State Water Resources Control Board (1979) 90 Cal.App.3d 816; Fullerton v. State Water Resources Control Board (1979) 90 Cal.App.3d 590.)

Redwood Creek -- photo Parks Conservancy

Mattole River -- photo Mattole River Council


Water code section 1707
Water Code section 1707

1707. (a) (1) Any person entitled to the use of water, whether based upon an appropriative, riparian, or other right, may petition the board . . . for a change for purposes of preserving or enhancing wetlands habitat, fish and wildlife resources, or recreation in, or on, the water.

. . . .

(b) The board may approve the petition . . . . whether or not the proposed use involves a diversion of water . . . .


Approval procedures
Approval Procedures

1707. (a) (1) Any person . . . may petition the board pursuant to [the provisions of the Water Code for changes in point of diversion, place of use or purpose of use] . . . .

. . . .

(b) The board may approve the petition . . . subject to any terms and conditions which, in the board's judgment, will best develop, conserve, and utilize, in the public interest, the water proposed to be used as part of the change . . . If the board determines that the proposed change meets all of the following requirements:

(1) Will not increase the amount of water the person is entitled to use.

(2) Will not unreasonably affect any legal user of water.

(3) Otherwise meets the requirements of this division.


Approval procedures1
Approval Procedures

  • Ordinary Changes (Wat. Code, § 1701 et seq.)

  • Temporary Urgency Changes (Wat. Code, § 1435 et seq.) Expedited procedures, which may include interim approval before public notice, but not statutorily exempt from CEQA. Limited to 180 days, but may be renewed.

  • Short-Term Transfers (Wat. Code, § 1725 et seq.) Expedited procedures, with exemption from CEQA. Limited to one year, but may be repeated.

  • Long-Term Transfers (Wat. Code, § 1735 et seq.)

  • Changes in Adjudicated Rights. May use any of the above procedures, or procedures authorized in adjudication decree.



POD

1950 Priority

return flow

POD

1920 Priority

return flow

POD

1960 Priority

return flow


POD

5cfs

1920

watershed

boundary

50% return flow

POD

1960

return flow


Who can hold a right changed to instream uses
Who Can Hold a Right Changed to Instream Uses?

Any person or entity capable of owning real property. (See Wat. Code, § 1252.5 [All rights and privileges conferred by this part upon any person in relation to the appropriation of water are likewise conferred upon the United States, the State, and any entity or organization capable of holding an interest in realproperty in this State.”])



ad