Agent based modelling and scenario analysis in the policy process
Download
1 / 15

Agent Based Modelling and Scenario Analysis in the Policy Process - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 117 Views
  • Uploaded on

Agent Based Modelling and Scenario Analysis in the Policy Process. Lessons from the FIRMA project informed by the first morning of the European Water Scenarios Workshop. Andrea Tilche’s objectives. Model supported consistent scenarios Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Agent Based Modelling and Scenario Analysis in the Policy Process' - sian


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Agent based modelling and scenario analysis in the policy process

Agent Based Modelling and Scenario Analysis in the Policy Process

Lessons from the FIRMA projectinformed by the first morning of the European Water Scenarios Workshop

Scott Moss,

Centre for Policy Modelling


Andrea tilche s objectives
Andrea Tilche’s objectives

  • Model supported consistent scenarios

  • Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches

  • Richly expressive analysis

    • Story lines and modelling approaches

  • Transparent and well documented

  • Stakeholder involvement

  • Scenarios support risk based a risk based approach to decision making

Scott Moss,

Centre for Policy Modelling


Joe alcamo s scenario vision
Joe Alcamo’s scenario vision

  • Qualitative and quantitative scenarios different but complementary

  • Iterative process between experts, modellers and stakeholders/policy makers to develop scenarios

    • “Final scenario” necessary for wider use

    • “We have to be visionary but also practical”

Scott Moss,

Centre for Policy Modelling


Scenario development process
Scenario Development Process

Scott Moss,

Centre for Policy Modelling


Models from the firma project
Models from the FIRMA Project

  • Validation

  • Integration of qualitative and quantitative

  • Integration of natural science and social behaviour in single model

Scott Moss,

Centre for Policy Modelling


Validation
Validation

  • Agents designed to describe real human or organisational actors

    • Individual behaviour

    • Social interaction

      • how

      • with whom

  • Rules can be validated by domain experts (eg stakeholders)

Scott Moss,

Centre for Policy Modelling


Model structure overall structure
Model Structure - Overall Structure

PolicyAgent

  • Ownership

  • Frequency

  • Volume

Households

Ground

  • Temperature

  • Rainfall

  • Sunshine

Aggregate Demand

Scott Moss,

Centre for Policy Modelling


An example social structure
An Example Social Structure

- Global Biased- Locally Biased- Self Biased

Scott Moss,

Centre for Policy Modelling


Statistical validation model version 2
Statistical validation – model version 2

Scott Moss,

Centre for Policy Modelling


Social behaviour and climate change
Social Behaviour and Climate Change

Reference runs

MH climate change

Individual

Social

Social influence: individual=33%, social=80%. All runs: 1973=100.

Scenarios broadly correspond to EA reference scenarios: individual (alphaand beta); social (gamma and delta).

Scott Moss,

Centre for Policy Modelling


Model of uk foresight scenario
Model of UK Foresight Scenario

  • OFV specified by Environment Agency

  • Water saving devices specified by Agency

  • Increased volatility turned out to be a bug

Scott Moss,

Centre for Policy Modelling


Some simulation general results
Some simulation general results

  • The more agents influence one another, the less variability across scenarios in aggregate water for demand

  • Confirmed that agent interaction and threshold behaviour generates heavy-tailed distributions

    • Any population distribution has undefined variance (and maybe undefined mean).

    • Conforms to observed domestic water demand

Scott Moss,

Centre for Policy Modelling


Two approaches compared
Two approaches Compared

Agent based:

Volatile

Unpredictable

  • Dynamic simulation:

  • Smooth scenarios

  • Predictable through convergence

Scott Moss,

Centre for Policy Modelling


Risk

  • Clustered volatility results from inter alia

    • Threshold behaviour by individuals

    • Dense patterns of social interaction with neighbours/acquaintances

  • Implies heavy tailed population distributions or (more plausibly?) no population distribution

    • Actuarial science based on finite-variance distributions

    • If distributions change endogenously through social interaction, does this affect prevailing risk/uncertainty assessment techniques?

Scott Moss,

Centre for Policy Modelling


Environmental scenario objectives paraphrased from alcamo and henrichs
Environmental Scenario Objectives(paraphrased from Alcamo and Henrichs)

  • To raise awareness about environmental problems

  • To take into account large time and spatial scales

  • To illustrate alternative environmental futures

  • To explore alternative policy pathways

  • To assess policy robustness to different conditions

  • To investigate connections among future problems

  • To combine qualitative and quantitative information

Scott Moss,

Centre for Policy Modelling


ad