1 / 18

Markets with Millions of Prices

Markets with Millions of Prices. R. Hanson, J. Ledyard, T. Ishikida IFREE Mini-Conference in Experimental Economics, May 3, 2003. We Want:. Every nation*quarter: Political stability Military activity Economic growth US $ aid US military activity. Combinatorial Info Markets.

shubha
Download Presentation

Markets with Millions of Prices

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Markets with Millions of Prices R. Hanson, J. Ledyard, T. Ishikida IFREE Mini-Conference in Experimental Economics, May 3, 2003

  2. We Want: • Every nation*quarter: • Political stability • Military activity • Economic growth • US $ aid • US military activity

  3. Combinatorial Info Markets • Most markets aggregate info as side effect • Info markets beat competing institutions • I.E.M. beat president polls 451/596 (Berg etal 2001) • But, markets fail when #prices >> #traders • Solutions: combo markets, market makers • Experiments to test, DARPA funded • Caltech students, 12-15 minute periods • Train, give info, let trade, see price accuracy

  4. Experiment Environment (Really: W V X S U Z Y T ) Case A B C D E F G H 1 0 1 0 1 - - - - 2 1 0 0 1 - - - - 3 0 0 1 1 - - - - 4 1 0 1 1 - - - - 5 0 1 1 1 - - - - 6 1 0 0 1 - - - - 7 0 1 1 1 - - - - 8 1 0 0 1 - - - - 9 1 0 0 1 - - - - 10 1 0 0 1 - - - - Sum 6 3 4 10 - - - - Same A B C D E F G H A -- 1 2 6 -- -- -- -- B -- -- 7 3 -- -- -- -- C -- -- -- 4 -- -- -- -- D -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- … • 8 binary vars: STUVWXYZ • 28 = 256 combinations • 20% = P(S=0) = P(S=T) = P(T=U) = P(U=V) = … = P(X=Y) = P(Y=Z) • 6 people, each see 10 cases: ABCD, EFGH, ABEF, CDGH, ACEG, BDFH • random map STUVWXYZ to ABCDEFGH

  5. Theory Benchmarks

  6. Simple Double Auction

  7. Combinatorial Call

  8. Individual Scoring Rule

  9. Market Scoring Rule

  10. Log Opinion Pool

  11. Conclusions • Experiments on complex info problem • 256 prices from 6 subjects in 15 min. • Bayesian estimates way too high a bar • Simple DA ~ combo call ~ score rule < combo market maker ~< opinion pool • But pools have weight choice problem when expertise is varied, specialized

  12. We Want: • Every nation*quarter: • Political stability • Military activity • Economic growth • US $ aid • US military activity

  13. Environments: Goals, Training (Actually: X Z Y ) Case A B C 1 1 - 1 2 1 - 0 3 1 - 0 4 1 - 0 5 1 - 0 6 1 - 1 7 1 - 1 8 1 - 0 9 1 - 0 10 0 - 0 Sum: 9 - 3 Same A B C A -- -- 4 B -- -- -- C -- -- -- • Want in Environment: • explainable, fast, neutral • many variables, few directly related • few people, each not see all data cases • compute rational share-info estimates • Training Environment: • 3 binary variables X,Y,Z, 23 = 8 combos • P(X=0) = .3, P(X=Y) = .2, P(Z=1)= .5 • 3 people, see 10 cases of: AB, BC, AC • random map XYZ to ABC

  14. 3 Variable Training Data

  15. Experiment Structure • Subjects were Caltech students • 6 periods per session, 12-15 minutes each • Each subject trained in 3 variable session • Metric: Kulback-Leibler i qilog(pi /qi)

  16. Troop Move Decision Advice $1 if War & Move Troops P(M) $1 if Move Troops P(W | M) $1 Compare! P(W | not M) $1 if Not Move Troops $1 if War & Not Move Troops P(not M)

  17. Accuracy Simple Info Markets Market Scoring Rules Scoring Rules opinion pool problem thin market problem 100 .001 .01 .1 1 10 Estimates per trader Old Tech Meet New

  18. D A C G F B E H A Scaleable Implementation • Overlapping variable patches • A simple MSR for each patch • Arbitrage neighbor patches • Limits profits to users who find inconsistencies • Only allow trade if all vars in same patch • User assets per patch, move via overlap • Regroup patches from request activity?

More Related