1 / 32

Jiaping Wang, Ph.D Department of Mathematical Science University of North Texas at Denton

Adaptive Weighted Deconvolution Model to Estimate the Cerebral Blood Flow Function in Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI. Jiaping Wang, Ph.D Department of Mathematical Science University of North Texas at Denton Joint work with Drs. Hongtu Zhu and Hongyu An f rom UNC-CH. Outline.

shima
Download Presentation

Jiaping Wang, Ph.D Department of Mathematical Science University of North Texas at Denton

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Adaptive WeightedDeconvolutionModel to Estimate the Cerebral Blood Flow Function in Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI Jiaping Wang, Ph.D Department of Mathematical Science University of North Texas at Denton Joint work with Drs. Hongtu Zhu and Hongyu An from UNC-CH

  2. Outline Background and Motivation Adaptive Weighted De-convolution Model Simulation Studies Real Data Analysis

  3. Part 1. Background and Motivation

  4. Background Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast (DSC) Perfusion MRImeasures the passage of a bolus of a non-diffusible contrast through the brain. The signal decreases as the bolus passes through the imaging slices.

  5. Convolution Relationship = R(t) where Ca(t) is the given AIF, C(t) is the observed concentration function, which is computed as S(t)/S0. We are interested in estimating the residue function R(t).

  6. Deconvolution Techniques SVD Fourier Transformation TSVD at 0.01 TSVD at 0.1 TSVD at 0.05 TSVD at 0.2

  7. Part 2. Adaptive Weighted Deconvolution Model

  8. Notations D : 3D volume N: the number of points on D d : a voxel in D : : spatial-temporal process : error process : AIF function, constant along space : Residue function

  9. Voxel-wise Approach • Temporal-Domain • Frequency-Domain

  10. Continuous Discrete Key Assumptions:

  11. Voxel-wise vs. Spatio-Interdependence Jumping Space Irregular Boundary Two Main Steps (Spatial Adaptive Approach): 1. Transform the time series into the Fourier or Wavelet domain. 2. Smoothing the curves in the frequency domain by involving the local neighborhood information.

  12. Spatial-Adaptive Approach Unknown Approximation

  13. Weighted LSE Estimated HRF

  14. Being Hierarchical Drawing nested spheres with increasing radiuses at each voxel and each frequency …

  15. Being Adaptive • Sequentially determine weights • Adaptively update Stopping Statistics

  16. How to determine ?

  17. Part 3. Simulations

  18. Simulation Set-up (iv) (i) (ii) (iii) (i) A temporal cut of the true images; (iii) The true curves R(t) (ii) The true curves C(t) (iv) The AIF Curve The true residue curves

  19. Simulation Results Result from SWADM Mean Curves of Clusters from SWADM Cluster Result Comparison Statistics: Dd= Where Xd is the estimated curve from the proposed method, Yd is from other methods including voxel-wise inverse Fourier Transformation (IFT), SVD, TSVD at thresholds 0.01, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2, respectively. ||•|| is a norm operator.

  20. Comparison Results (1) Comparison with SVD; (3) Comparison with TSVD at 0.05; (2) Comparison with TSVD at 0.01; (4) Comparison with TSVD at 0.1; (6) Comparison with Voxel-wise IFT; (5) Comparison with TSVD at 0.2;

  21. Comparison along SNRs SVD TSVD at 0.01 TSVD at 0.05 TSVD at 0.1 TSVD at 0.2 Voxel-wise IFT Average of Dd along different SNRs One sample t test for Dd

  22. Part 4. Real Data

  23. Data Description The DSC PWI data set obtained from an acute ischemic stroke patient at Washington University in St. Louis after receiving a signed consent form with Institutional Review Board approval. MR images were acquired on a 3T Siemens whole body Trio system (Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany). PWI images were acquired with a T2*-weighted gradient echo EPI sequence (TR/TE= 1500/43 ms,14 slices with a slice thickness of 5 mm, matrix= 128x128). This sequence was repeated 50 times and Gadolinium diethylenetriaminepenta-acetic acid (Gd-DTPA, 0.1 mmol/kg) was injected at the completion of the 5th measure. (e)

  24. Clustering Results Sample of C(t) curves, the largest one can be considered as AIF. Slices from C(t) images Mean curves of clusters Clustered pattern

  25. Estimation Results from Different Methods The curves from same voxel in Cluster I The curves from same voxel in Cluster II

  26. Thank You!

More Related