1 / 22

New Tools New Visions W.K. Kellogg Foundation Grant

New Tools New Visions W.K. Kellogg Foundation Grant. Community Partners. HBCU Partners. Health Disparities, Ethics, and Participation: New Tools/New Visions. A Program to eliminate health disparities using Community-Based Participatory Research Initiated: August 2005

shilah
Download Presentation

New Tools New Visions W.K. Kellogg Foundation Grant

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. New Tools New Visions W.K. Kellogg Foundation Grant Community Partners HBCU Partners

  2. Health Disparities, Ethics, and Participation: New Tools/New Visions A Program to eliminate health disparities using Community-Based Participatory Research Initiated: August 2005 Funding: W.K. Kellogg Foundation Amount: $4 million over 5 years

  3. The Vision Unite together African American communities with Historically Black Colleges and University faculty and students to create solutions for reducing the economic, racist, cultural and health care problems that cause health disparities.

  4. NTNV Concept of Community

  5. The Approach • Use Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) • Connect Research to Action • Create new leaders in health • Network with communities and institutions to change local, state and national policy.

  6. Why Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR)? • Respect for Community Competencies • Willingness to share Power/decision-making, and • Accept all perspectives… We create powerful investigations, more effective programs, and enhance the trust within our communities.

  7. NTNV Seeks to Create A process for developing current and future leaders from the African American community committed to, and capable of, closing the health divide. Ongoing community collaborative research projects in health and health practices that reflect the unique cultural and historical life of the community.

  8. A sustainable network of HBCUs/practitioner organizations/community organizations that will take an activist approach to eliminating health disparities. A communications network with local communities and HBCU institutions in other southeastern states.

  9. Background

  10. Traditional Measure of Health Disparity • Mortality Rate Ratio (RR): Mortality rate of African American Population / Mortality Rate of Anglo Population • Note: If the RR = 1, then there is not disparity. If RR is greater than 1, then mortality in African Americans is higher.

  11. Age Adjusted Death Rate Ratiosfor African Americans

  12. The Persistence of the Problem • Why have we not solved the problems of Health Disparities? • Will doing the same things over and over again achieve a different outcome?

  13. AIDS by Ethnicity: United States, 1990-2000

  14. How can we solve the problems of Health Disparities? • Our experience with HIV has shown us that providing the same interventions to ethnically different communities results in increased health disparities • One Approach: Community-Based Participatory Research

  15. Primary and Secondary Syphilis: United States, 1995-1999

  16. NTNV--Details Moving on from Where We Stand Now.

  17. Project Elements

  18. Project Objectives • Year One –Create partnerships between communities and HBCUs • Year Two – Conduct pilot project • Year Three – Complete a fundable proposal or conduct an implementation project • Year Four – Policy translation • Year Five - Final reporting, publications, model sharing…and building …….Sustainability after the funding ends

  19. Building Participation into Decision-Making Process • Grant w/Kellogg set forth objectives for the life of the project and on an annual basis. • Statewide Coordinating Committee will review overall project objectives bi-annually (approximately every 6 months) • Evaluation of previous year and plan for subsequent year outlined in Statewide Coordinating Committee for August Report by RCHD/SCRC.

  20. Decision-Making Cont…

  21. Questions & Discussion

More Related