1 / 8

Business Associations/Corporations Class 20

Business Associations/Corporations Class 20. Professor Hill. Transactions Involving Controlling Shareholders: Weinberger. P has burden of showing reason to invoke more than BJ (remember Sinclair?)

shilah
Download Presentation

Business Associations/Corporations Class 20

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Business Associations/Corporations Class 20 Professor Hill

  2. Transactions Involving Controlling Shareholders: Weinberger • P has burden of showing reason to invoke more than BJ (remember Sinclair?) • Then, if D can show good process (here, approval by informed vote of majority of minority), P has burden to show transaction is unfair to minority • If D can’t show good process, must show fairness • Here, fair dealing and fair price

  3. Vocabulary • Entrenchment • Proxy expenses for fight over policy vs. fight over personnel • “quick asset value” (net or gross) • Related definition • Treasury stock • Standstill agreement • Standstill agreement (another definition) • [Greenmail]

  4. Vocabulary • Exchange offer • Selective or discriminatory self-tender • Two-tier, front loaded, (“bust-up”) • Second step (back-end) merger • “grossly inadequate” • Restrictive covenants

  5. Vocabulary • Senior debt • Corporate raider • Junk bonds • Highly subordinated • ‘coercive’ • Pro rata

  6. Takeover defenses • Unocal framework: IF • Reasonable grounds to believe that there is a threat to corporate policy and effectiveness AND • Response reasonable in relation to threat posed • THEN: D gets bj deference

  7. T. Boone Pickens of Mesa, 1985 (?) and 2006

  8. Mesa holding and aftermath • Discriminatory self-tender permitted where • threat to corporate policy and effectiveness and • Response is reasonable in relation to threat posed • SEC outlaws discriminatory self-tender, adopting “all-holders” rule • Poison pills are permitted, though, and they allow for discrimination between acquirer and other shareholders

More Related