Evaluation of Transport Masterplan 2003/2008 impacts 2009 06 04 Angelika Winkler

1. Evaluation of Transport Masterplan 2003/2008 impacts 2009 06 04 Angelika Winkler

2. Main Emphasis of ActionVienna Masterplan Transportation 2003 Rails and Roads for Europe! Safe Mobility: Vision Zero! no fatalities S-Bahn (Commuter Rail) plus! attractive public transport linking city and region Out of the Way! re-use of public space Giant Cycle Traffic! great leap forward in improvement of cycling conditions Impulses to Urban Develoment by Metro! Fast Tramway Tangentials! attractive public transport at the periphery Systematised Mobility! Traffic & Mobility Management Stops only at Stops! systematic right of way for trams and busses Logistics Competence! high-quality freight transport and delivery

3. Reach of Masterplan Transport (among the experts) Masterplan Verkehr Wien 2003 - Internetbefragung (Fachöffentlichkeit) Do you use the masterplan in your daily work? Special interest group 42% 33% 17% 8% Research 20% 60% 20% 67% 33% Universiy 50% 33% 17% Transport Planning Public administration 8% 54% 23% 15% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% often occasional seldom At no time

4. Guidelines for Evaluation • Definition of purpose of evaluation • Methodic orientation based on originally concept • Qualitative und quantitative elements, simple and realizable system of indicators • Evaluation is a learning process • Evaluation is a participative process • Combination of ex post - and ex ante - processes

5. Design of Process experts, administration, transport companies • self-Evaluation • participation of stakeholders evaluation-team special interest groups policy

6. Understanding of tasks Evaluation is not an... • Instrument to control But an... • Instrument for orientation and support politicians and the administration • Achieve common learning and applied knowledge-management • Result of cooperative work within the adminstration after wide public discussions • Instrument for methodically discussion about interim results of a longterm concept

7. Organisation Management processing and expert knowledge Projectmanagemant External Experts contractors content/ organisationProject control 6 independant external experts Core team Content controlling Coordination Clarification of general framework and Main action focus AG AG AG AG AG Technical processing for working gropus: pedestrians, bikes, parking, commercial transport, public and private transport

8. Criterias of Evaluation Relevance – Do we the right thing? review of current general framework and changing conditions Effectiveness – Do we reach the goals? Relates to the ideal world. appraisal of results and trends Efficancy – Is the ratio of ressource cost-effective? Relates to the real word. appraisal of implementation, costs, strategies, communication and cooperation, Impact – how much is the contribution to higher goals? how high ist the contribution to enviroment, economic location attractiveness and structure of urban development Sustainabiltiy – Are the effects long lived? Strategic future trends, references –and if neccessary new orientation and new criteria

9. Two Phases of action • continuous recording of implementation (check of main criterias, goals and messures, reports) Evaluation Update • adaption of guiding principles • new weighting of goals • update of transport masterplan

10. Evalution und Update of Transport Masterplan – formal set-up evalution of generel framework Ex post evalution evaluation of goals goal acheivement Ex ante evalution evaluation of process messures And messures upate messures

11. additional challenges in Vienna region growth of population higher than assumed boundless european economic area challenge in policies of environment, energy and climate change, Kyoto till climate change programm of Viennna, anti-air pollution programms a.s.o. external help: several solutions are in progress: higher costs of fuel technical innovationen for emission and reduction of energy consumption by cars „environmentalization“ of legal and fiscal general framework

12. main criterias for evaluation Shared mode of trips 1 2 3 4 5 Traffic flow Chances of mobility Road safety Negativ effects of traffic

13. Main goal: shift of car traffic 2020 1993 2001 2006 1-9,20 14-19 10-11 12,13,23 21,22 2020 2001 2006 Pedestrian 27 28 27 27 30 26 27 25 24 55 65 63 2 4 5 Bike 3 3 4 3 8 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 Pow. Two-wheller 0 0 Car as driver 25 30 26 25 17 23 27 31 34 7 10 9 9 9 Car as passenger 10 10 11 40 29 34 35 40 39 34 30 26 45 35 37 Public transport Originating and terminating Traffic Trips of Viennese Vienna Groups of districts 2006 Source: Socialdata

14. Modal Split in Vienna – presence and future

15. Trips of Viennese 100 Shared mode of car trips 90 80 70 75 70 60 64 63 63 50 ÖV 40 30 MIV Shared mode of green transport (public transport, bike and foot) 20 Rad 10 0 1990 2001 2010 2020 1970

16. Main goal: Avoiding car traffic 2001 2006 +3,7% total car traffic in Vienna per day 2001 2006 goal 2020 +1,44% kilometers travelled of Viennese in Vienna 2001 2006 kilometers travelled Of non-Viennese in Vienna Quelle: Socialdata Vienna + 3,7 % Inner districts - 2,8 % 2001-2006: +6,5% inhabi- tants across the border + 10,1 % kilometers travelled in Vienna on main routes 2000 - 2005: Quelle: Händische Straßenverkehrszählung an Gemeindestraßen A+B

17. Reduction of Nitrogen dioxyde:no exceedance limits Amount of exceedance NO2 (half hour-data) MPV 2003

18. Evaluation of main goal avoiding car traffic 8 7,8 7,5 7,5 7 6,5 6,3 5,4 5,1 5,1 5 3,9 3,5 2,6 2020 93 01 06 93 01 06 93 01 06 93 01 06 93 01 06 All modes car Public transport bike car Average length of trips in internal traffic of Viennes in km Non residentals Length of trips is growing (+6%), but not by cars Quelle: Socialdata 2007

19. Reduction of carbon dioxydegoal 2010: 0,72 t CO2/inhabitant 2006: 0,83 t/inh. 1990: 0,76 t/inh. Development of carbon dioxide in Vienna For reduction of carbon dioxyde is neccessary to reduce kilometers travelled and increase energy efficiency.

20. Sustainable social development Road safety: goal 2020: -50 % dead and injured 71 72 56 59

21. Conclusion after evaluation of goals Tendencies are right: high success since 1993 within the main goals: shift and avoiding of car traffic Open question: is this enough for the goal in 2020? No approach by criterias of environment (Carbon Dioxyde, nitrogen Big potential capacity lie in outer districts and cross border traffic

22. Evaluation of measures 370 messures Not in scope of action for city of Vienna 9 % Realised or in progress Time lags, implementation not finished High time lags, implementation uncertain or impossible 10 % 56 % 25 %

23. Main action focus:

24. (Main) Roads - Projects • junctions • New motorways (S 1, A 24) • Parking regulations • ITS Vienna Region

25. terminal Hafen Freudenau

26. Public Transport - projects • tangential connection between metrolines • trams for developing areas • new S-Bahn lines

27. Angelika Winkler Magistratsabteilung 18 Referat für Verkehrsplanung und Mobilitätsstrategien Rathausstraße 14-16 1082 Wien fon +43 1 4000 88812 mail angelika.winkler@wien.gv.at