1 / 10

ESCC’s QEP. . . Putting the Puzzle Together

ESCC’s QEP. . . Putting the Puzzle Together. ESCC Faculty & Staff Orientation. QEP Update. What is another name for a “Clicker”?. Husband who is on a family camping trip and is having “sans remote” withdrawal symptoms. Student Response Device… …Currently, YOU!. What does “QEP” stand for?.

shelby
Download Presentation

ESCC’s QEP. . . Putting the Puzzle Together

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ESCC’s QEP. . . Putting the Puzzle Together Phyllis R. Tanner

  2. ESCCFaculty & StaffOrientation QEP Update Phyllis R. Tanner

  3. What is another name for a“Clicker”? Husband who is on a family camping trip and is having “sans remote” withdrawal symptoms. Student Response Device… …Currently, YOU! Phyllis R. Tanner

  4. What does “QEP” stand for? • Quit Expecting Perfection B. Quality Enhancement Plan Phyllis R. Tanner

  5. Select one of the following to identify…. A B The title of ESCC’s QEP Phyllis R. Tanner

  6. ESCC’s QEP Title … B A Three-Dimensional Approach to Improving Student Learning A ESCC’s Best- Qep’d Secrets for Student Learning Phyllis R. Tanner

  7. The Three College-Level Competencies Upon Which the Dimensions are Based…. B • Personal • Interpersonal • Community • A • Communication • Technology • Thinking and Problem Solving Phyllis R. Tanner

  8. Findings from the Review Of 30 QEP Impact Reports 11 reviewed in December 19 reviewed in June 26 acceptable 4 unacceptable Phyllis R. Tanner

  9. “How’s that working for us?” • Feb. 19, 2010 – Received results of the Committee on Fifth-Year Interim Report’s review of our QEP Impact Report. In a word: “Unacceptable” • An additional report demonstrating the extent to which the QEP has affected outcomes related to student learning is due with the referral report. • Follow-up Report is forwarded to C & R Committee for action that can include additional monitoring or negative action. Problematic Issues: • Insufficient linkage with distinct student learning outcomes, assessment activities, and appropriate assessment measures. • Minimal improvement based upon the results of evaluation data. • Assessments appear to be class or activity-based rather than broad campus-wide assessment. Phyllis R. Tanner

  10. We have embraced the constructive criticism in the hopes that we will be able to put the pieces together and not only satisfy the requirements of SACS-COC, but participate successfully in our goal, which is…. …To improve student learning in both academic and non-academic environments by enhancing student engagement in the learning process. Phyllis R. Tanner

More Related