1 / 47

Non-life insurance mathematics

Non-life insurance mathematics. Nils F. Haavardsson, University of Oslo and DNB Skadeforsikring. Key ratios – claim frequency. The graph shows claim frequency for all covers for motor insurance Notice seasonal variations , due to changing weather condition throughout the years.

shawn
Download Presentation

Non-life insurance mathematics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Non-lifeinsurancemathematics Nils F. Haavardsson, University of Oslo and DNB Skadeforsikring

  2. Key ratios – claimfrequency • The graph shows claimfrequency for all covers for motor insurance • Noticeseasonalvariations, due to changingweatherconditionthroughouttheyears

  3. The model (Section 8.4) • The idea is to attributevariation in to variations in a setofobservable variables x1,...,xv. Poissonregressjon makes useofrelationshipsofthe form (1.12) • Why and not itself? • The expectednumberofclaims is non-negative, where as thepredictoronthe right of (1.12) can be anythingonthe real line • It makes more sense to transform so thattheleft and right side of (1.12) are more in line witheachother. • Historical data areofthefollowing form • n1 T1 x11...x1x • n2 T2 x21...x2x • nnTn xn1...xnv • The coefficients b0,...,bvareusuallydetermined by likelihoodestimation Claimsexposurecovariates

  4. Introduction to reserving Non-lifeinsurance from a financialperspective: for a premium an insurancecompanycommitsitself to pay a sum if an event has occured Contractperiod retrospective prospective Policy holder signs up for an insurance During thedurationofthe policy, someof thepremium is earned, some is unearned • How muchpremium is earned? • How muchpremium is unearned? • Is theunearnedpremiumsufficient? Premium reserve, prospective Policy holder payspremium. Insurance company starts to earnpremium During thedurationofthe policy, claimsmight or might not occur: • How do wemeasurethenumber and sizeofunknownclaims? • How do weknowifthe reserves onknownclaimsaresufficient? Claims reserve, retrospective Accident date Reporting date Claims payments Claimsclose Claims reopening Claims payments Claimsclose

  5. Imagine youwant to build a reserve risk model Therearethreeeffectsthatinfluencethe best estimat and theuncertainty: •Paymentpattern •RBNS movements •Reporting pattern Up to recentlytheindustry has basedmodelonpaymenttriangles: Whatwillthefuturepaymentsamount to? ?

  6. Overview

  7. The ultimate goal for calculatingthe pure premium is pricing Pure premium = Claimfrequency x claimseverity Parametric and non parametricmodelling (section 9.2 EB) The log-normal and Gamma families (section 9.3 EB) The Pareto families (section 9.4 EB) Extreme valuemethods (section 9.5 EB) Searching for themodel (section 9.6 EB)

  8. Claimseveritymodelling is aboutdescribingthevariation in claimsize • The graphbelow shows howclaimsizevaries for fire claims for houses • The graph shows data up to the 88th percentile • How do we handle «typicalclaims» ? (claimsthatoccurregurlarly) • How do we handle largeclaims? (claimsthatoccurrarely) Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  9. Claimseveritymodelling is aboutdescribingthevariation in claimsize • The graphbelow shows howclaimsizevaries for water claims for houses • The graph shows data up to the 97th percentile • The shapeof fire claims and water claimsseem to be quite different • Whatdoesthissuggestaboutthe drivers of fire claims and water claims? • Anyimplications for pricing? Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  10. The ultimate goal for calculatingthepure premium is pricing • Claimsizemodellingcan be parametricthrough families ofdistributionssuch as the Gamma, log-normal or Pareto with parameters tuned to historical data • Claimsizemodellingcanalso be non-parametricwhereeachclaimziofthepast is assigned a probability 1/n of re-appearing in thefuture • A newclaim is thenenvisaged as a random variable for which • This is an entirely proper probabilitydistribution • It is known as theempiricaldistribution and will be useful in Section 9.5. Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Sizeofclaim Client behavourcanaffectoutcome • Burglar alarm • Tidyship (maintenanceetc) • Garage for thecar Bad luck • Electric failure • Catastrophes • House fires Extreme value Where do wedraw the line? Searching Here we sample from theempiricaldistribution Here weusespecial Techniques (section 9.5)

  11. Example Non parametric Empirical distribution Log-normal, Gamma • The thresholdmay be set for example at the 99th percentile, i.e., 500 000 NOK for thisproduct • The threshold is sometimescalledthelargeclaimsthreshold The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  12. Scale families ofdistributions • All sensible parametricmodels for claimsizeareofthe form • and Z0 is a standardized random variable corresponding to . • This proportionality os inherited by expectations, standard deviations and percentiles; i.e. ifareexpectation, standard devation and -percentile for Z0, thenthe same quantities for Z are • The parameter canrepresent for exampletheexchange rate. • The effectof passing from onecurrency to anotherdoes not changetheshapeofthedensityfunction (iftheconditionabove is satisfied) • In statistics is known as a parameter ofscale • Assumethe log-normal modelwhere and are parameters and . Then . Assumewerephrasethemodel as • Then Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  13. Fitting a scalefamily • Models for scale families satisfy • wherearethedistributionfunctionsof Z and Z0. • Differentiatingwithrespect to z yieldsthefamilyofdensityfunctions • The standard wayof fitting suchmodels is throughlikelihoodestimation. If z1,…,znarethehistoricalclaims, thecriterionbecomes • which is to be maximizedwithrespect to and other parameters. • A usefulextension covers situationswithcensoring. • Perhapsthesituationwheretheactual loss is only given as somelowerbound b is most frequent. • Example: • travel insurance. Expenses by loss oftickets (travel documents) and passportarecovered up to 10 000 NOK ifthe loss is not covered by anyoftheotherclauses. Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  14. Fitting a scalefamily • The chanceof a claim Z exceeding b is , and for nbsucheventswithlowerbounds b1,…,bnbtheanalogous joint probabilitybecomes • Takethelogarithmofthisproduct and add it to the log likelihoodofthefullyobservedclaims z1,…,zn. The criterionthenbecomes Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma completeinformation censoring to the right The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  15. Shifteddistributions • The distributionof a claimmay start at sometreshold b insteadoftheorigin. • Obviousexamplesaredeductibles and re-insurancecontracts. • Models can be constructed by adding b to variables starting at theorigin; i.e. where Z0 is a standardized variable as before. Now • and differentiationwithrespect to z yields • which is thedensityfunctionof random variables with b as a lower limit. Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  16. Skewness as simple descriptionofshape • A major issuewithclaimsizemodelling is asymmetry and the right tailofthedistribution. A simple summary is thecoefficientofskewness • The numerator is thethird order moment. Skewnessshould not dependoncurrency and doesn’tsince • Skewness is often used as a simplifiedmeasureofshape • The standard estimateoftheskewnesscoefficient from observations z1,…,zn is Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  17. Non-parametricestimation • The random variable that attaches probabilities 1/n to all claimsziofthepast is a possiblemodel for futureclaims. • Expectation, standard deviation, skewness and percentilesare all closelyrelated to theordinary sample versions. For example • Furthermore, • Third order moment and skewnessbecomes • Skewnesstends to be small • No simulatedclaimcan be largeerthanwhat has beenobserved in thepast • These drawbacks implyunderestimationof risk Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  18. TPL Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  19. Hull Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  20. The log-normal family • A convenientdefinitionofthe log-normal model in the present context is • as where • Mean, standard deviation and skewnessare • seesection 2.4. • Parameter estimation is usuallycarriedout by notingthatlogarithmsareGaussian. Thus • and whenthe original log-normal observations z1,…,znaretransformed to Gaussianonesthrough y1=log(z1),…,yn=log(zn) with sample mean and variance , theestimatesofbecome Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  21. Log-normal sampling (Algoritm 2.5) Input: Draw Return Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  22. The lognormalfamily • Different choiceof ksi and sigma • The shapedependsheavilyon sigma and is highlyskewedwhen sigma is not tooclose to zero Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  23. The Gamma family • The Gamma family is an importantfamily for whichthedensityfunction is • It wasdefined in Section 2.5 as is the standard Gamma withmeanone and shapealpha. The densityofthe standard Gamma simplifies to • Mean, standard deviation and skewnessare • and there is a convolutionproperty. Suppose G1,…,Gnareindependentwith • . Then Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  24. Exampleof Gamma distribution Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  25. Hull coverage (i.e., damagesonownvehicle in a collisionor othersudden and unforeseendamage) Time period for parameter estimation: 2 years Covariates: • Driving length • Car age • Region ofcarowner • Tariff class • Bonus ofinsuredvehicle 2 modelsaretested and compared – Gamma and lognormal Example: carinsurance Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  26. The modelsarecomparedwithrespect to fit, results, validationofmodel, type 3 analysis and QQ plots Fit: ordinaryfitmeasuresarecompared Results: parameter estimatesofthemodelsarecompared Validationofmodel: the data material is split in two, independentgroups. The model is calibrated (i.e., estimated) onone half and validatedontheother half Type 3 analysisofeffects: Doesthefitofthemodelimprovesignificantly by includingthespecific variable? Comparisonsof Gamma and lognormal Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  27. Comparisonof Gamma and lognormal - fit Gamma fit Lognormalfit Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  28. Comparisonof Gamma and lognormal – type 3 Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma Gamma fit Lognormalfit The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  29. QQ plot Gamma model Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  30. QQ plot log normal model Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  31. Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  32. Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  33. Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  34. Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  35. Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  36. Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  37. None ofthemodelsseem to be perfect Lognormalbehavesworst and can be discarded Canwe do better? Wetry Gamma once more, nowexludingthe 0 claims (about 17% oftheclaims) • Claimswherethe policy holder has noguilt (other party is to blame) Conclusions so far Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  38. Comparisonof Gamma and lognormal - fit Gamma fit Gamma without zero claimsfit Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  39. Comparisonof Gamma and lognormal – type 3 Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma Gamma fit Gamma without zero claimsfit The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  40. QQ plot Gamma Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  41. QQ plot Gamma modelwithoutzero claims Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  42. Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  43. Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  44. Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  45. Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  46. Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

  47. Non parametric Log-normal, Gamma The Pareto Extreme value Searching

More Related