1 / 8

Support for Excellence Programme Peer Review and Development

Support for Excellence Programme Peer Review and Development. Natspec Conference workshop Elisabeth Johnson, Norma Curtis, D a vid Syson. Introductions. Elisabeth Johnson Assistant Principal Ruskin Mill College Norma Curtis Quality Improvement Manager RNIB Loughborough

shanie
Download Presentation

Support for Excellence Programme Peer Review and Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Support for Excellence ProgrammePeer Review and Development Natspec Conference workshop Elisabeth Johnson, Norma Curtis, David Syson

  2. Introductions Elisabeth Johnson Assistant Principal Ruskin Mill College Norma Curtis Quality Improvement Manager RNIB Loughborough David Syson PRD Adviser

  3. PRD – What is it? • Cross organisational review • Review carried out by peers from other colleges • 1 or 2 day reviews • Bench marking • Themed workshops • Self regulation? • Development based on review

  4. Who is involved? • 196 groups of colleges / providers • GFE, Sixth Form, Offender Learning, Adult community, Work based providers • 7 groups of Independent Specialist Colleges • NW, SW, NE, SE, Midlands & East Midlands • 4 – 7 colleges in a group • Some running 2 years a few just started • Funded by LSC. Managed by LSIS & Deloitte

  5. The PRD Cycle • Consider output from Monitoring and evaluation • Make changes to approach, planning, roles etc. • Roles and responsibilities • PRD group protocols • Action Plan • Develop & agree meeting cycle • Establish impact measures • Forming the review team – skills needs • Skills Development • Logistics and preparing documentation Preparing for review • Carrying out the review activities Getting started Review • Monitor the improvements made to the organisations • Evaluate the PRD group’s performance • Improve/develop the group activities as appropriate – impact? • Feedback to the host organisation • Report on the review activities • Consideration of recommendations at appropriate level within host organisation Monitoring and Evaluation Feedback and Reporting • Design and action the development/improvement plan based on the output of the review • Joint activities to develop each others organisations • Review/add to impact measures Development Development

  6. PRD themes • SAR & QIP development & validation • Peer Lesson observations & training • Data –systems & bench marking • Learner voice, involvement strategy • Curriculum area reviews – Music • Measuring learner progression • Middle manager development • Any area of the organisation or the learner journey

  7. Comments from groups Members of staff involved have referred to PRD as the best professional development. Increased confidence of staff Increased rigour of internal quality systems All the ‘scrutiny of Ofsted with support’ Effective solution focused activities Very effective preparation for external inspection Hugely beneficial in gaining new ideas

  8. Sources of information • Excellence Gateway www.excellencegateway.org.uk/sfe • PRD Resource Centre www.excellencegateway.org.uk/page.aspx?o=resourcecentre • By sector – Specialist Colleges • By theme – E & D, ECM, SAR, leadership, capacity to improve • Adviser

More Related