2010 report on oasis data 2007 2010
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 24

2010 Report on Oasis Data 2007-2010 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 97 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

2010 Report on Oasis Data 2007-2010. Long Beach, CA September 13 -14, 2011 R. Darrell Taylor Raytheon. Executive Summary. Baselines have been established for 2007 – 2010 No Feedback data, changing metric Review Proposed revision to the CB Report Card. Agenda. OASIS Entries – Audits

Download Presentation

2010 Report on Oasis Data 2007-2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


2010 report on oasis data 2007 2010

2010 Report on Oasis Data 2007-2010

Long Beach, CA

September 13 -14, 2011

R. Darrell TaylorRaytheon

Long Beach, CA September 13-14, 2011


Executive summary

Executive Summary

  • Baselines have been established for 2007 – 2010

  • No Feedback data, changing metric

  • Review Proposed revision to the CB Report Card


Agenda

Agenda

  • OASIS Entries – Audits

  • OASIS Nonconformities

  • AS9100 Elements

  • Feedback

  • Monitoring Model


Entries audits

Entries – Audits

Long Beach, CA September 13-14, 2011


Comparison of entries 2007 2010

Comparison of Entries 2007 -2010

  • Entries:

    • 2007 – 5114

    • 2008 – 5972 ^16%

    • 2009 – 6969 ^17%

    • 2010 – 7502 ^7.6%

    • -2011 – 32538/1/2011

Increase slowing down


Comparison of types 2007 2010

SUR=Surveillance

REC = Recertification

INT = Initial

Comparison of Types2007 -2010

2011 – 72%, 21 %, 7%


Standards entered into database

Standards Entered Into Database

38 AS9100C – 2010; 225 in 2011 as 05 8/1/2011


Crb comments 2010

CRB Comments - 2010

  • 2007 – 2010 Data baselined

Going to Rolling Format


Nonconformities

Nonconformities

Long Beach, CA September 13-14, 2011


Pareto of total nonconformities

Pareto of Total Nonconformities

Totals

2010 – 20,009

2009 -20,980

2008 -18,803

2007 – 14,957

2011 – 65% 2 or less


Oasis ratio of total findings

OASIS Ratio of Total Findings

Identify CB’s in the bottom 5% writing nonconformities

Violates Normal Distribution

Strongest fit 3 Parameter Lognormal


Total comments

Total - Comments

  • Field “Family of Standards” states ISO9001:2000 s/b 2008?

  • 35 (<.5%)Entries with N/A in Numbers, what does that mean?

    • 2 Initials, 1 surveillance, 32 recertification


Ratio majors entries

Ratio Majors/Entries

Totals

2010 – 1387

2009 -1135

2008 – 976

2007 - 870

On average, one Major is written every fifth audit – NOTE: Average down to .18 per audit for 2010 (1/5 audits)

No Change in 2011 (.19)

.22 for AS9100C audits


Oasis ratio of majors

OASIS Ratio of Majors

NOT Normal Distribution

strongest 3 parameter loglogistic

Identify CB’s in the bottom 5% writing majors


Ratio minors entries

Ratio Minors/Entries

Totals

2010 – 18,627

2009 -19,414

2008 -17,393

2007 –14,087

On average, 2.5 Minors are written every audit

2011 – down to 2.12

AS9100C – 3.18


Oasis ratio of minors

OASIS Ratio of Minors

NOT Normal Distribution

Lognormal Distribution

Identify CB’s in the bottom 5% writing minors


Evaluation of audit type int rec sur

Evaluation of Audit Type INT, REC, SUR

  • Chi Squared Test returned a P-Value = 0.069


As9100 nonconformities top 10

AS9100 Nonconformities Top 10

NO CHANGE

Top Eight 2010 same as 2009 & 2008


Feedback analysis

Feedback Analysis

ON HOLD

2010 average 103 per month

2009 average 112 per month

2008 average 110 per month

As of June 6% of 2010 Feedback Responses still open


Certification body statistical assessment model

Certification Body Statistical Assessment Model

ON HOLD

General - 1 Criteria

Feedback - 3 Criteria

OASIS Results - 3 Criteria

ANAB Performance -4

ANAB Audits - 6 Criteria


Threshold violations

Threshold Violations

  • RMC & ANAB need to research

    • >6

  • ANAB to report to RMC

    • 4-5

  • ANAB to investigate

    • 2-3

  • No Action

    • <2


2010 report on oasis data 2007 2010

CB Name: XXX -2011


2010 report on oasis data 2007 2010

CB Name: XXX -2011

ANAB Additional Comments


Questions

Questions


  • Login