1 / 24

2010 Report on Oasis Data 2007-2010

2010 Report on Oasis Data 2007-2010. Long Beach, CA September 13 -14, 2011 R. Darrell Taylor Raytheon. Executive Summary. Baselines have been established for 2007 – 2010 No Feedback data, changing metric Review Proposed revision to the CB Report Card. Agenda. OASIS Entries – Audits

shandi
Download Presentation

2010 Report on Oasis Data 2007-2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2010 Report on Oasis Data 2007-2010 Long Beach, CA September 13 -14, 2011 R. Darrell TaylorRaytheon Long Beach, CA September 13-14, 2011

  2. Executive Summary • Baselines have been established for 2007 – 2010 • No Feedback data, changing metric • Review Proposed revision to the CB Report Card

  3. Agenda • OASIS Entries – Audits • OASIS Nonconformities • AS9100 Elements • Feedback • Monitoring Model

  4. Entries – Audits Long Beach, CA September 13-14, 2011

  5. Comparison of Entries 2007 -2010 • Entries: • 2007 – 5114 • 2008 – 5972 ^16% • 2009 – 6969 ^17% • 2010 – 7502 ^7.6% • -2011 – 3253 8/1/2011 Increase slowing down

  6. SUR=Surveillance REC = Recertification INT = Initial Comparison of Types2007 -2010 2011 – 72%, 21 %, 7%

  7. Standards Entered Into Database 38 AS9100C – 2010; 225 in 2011 as 05 8/1/2011

  8. CRB Comments - 2010 • 2007 – 2010 Data baselined Going to Rolling Format

  9. Nonconformities Long Beach, CA September 13-14, 2011

  10. Pareto of Total Nonconformities Totals 2010 – 20,009 2009 -20,980 2008 -18,803 2007 – 14,957 2011 – 65% 2 or less

  11. OASIS Ratio of Total Findings Identify CB’s in the bottom 5% writing nonconformities Violates Normal Distribution Strongest fit 3 Parameter Lognormal

  12. Total - Comments • Field “Family of Standards” states ISO9001:2000 s/b 2008? • 35 (<.5%)Entries with N/A in Numbers, what does that mean? • 2 Initials, 1 surveillance, 32 recertification

  13. Ratio Majors/Entries Totals 2010 – 1387 2009 -1135 2008 – 976 2007 - 870 On average, one Major is written every fifth audit – NOTE: Average down to .18 per audit for 2010 (1/5 audits) No Change in 2011 (.19) .22 for AS9100C audits

  14. OASIS Ratio of Majors NOT Normal Distribution strongest 3 parameter loglogistic Identify CB’s in the bottom 5% writing majors

  15. Ratio Minors/Entries Totals 2010 – 18,627 2009 -19,414 2008 -17,393 2007 –14,087 On average, 2.5 Minors are written every audit 2011 – down to 2.12 AS9100C – 3.18

  16. OASIS Ratio of Minors NOT Normal Distribution Lognormal Distribution Identify CB’s in the bottom 5% writing minors

  17. Evaluation of Audit Type INT, REC, SUR • Chi Squared Test returned a P-Value = 0.069

  18. AS9100 Nonconformities Top 10 NO CHANGE Top Eight 2010 same as 2009 & 2008

  19. Feedback Analysis ON HOLD 2010 average 103 per month 2009 average 112 per month 2008 average 110 per month As of June 6% of 2010 Feedback Responses still open

  20. Certification Body Statistical Assessment Model ON HOLD General - 1 Criteria Feedback - 3 Criteria OASIS Results - 3 Criteria ANAB Performance -4 ANAB Audits - 6 Criteria

  21. Threshold Violations • RMC & ANAB need to research • >6 • ANAB to report to RMC • 4-5 • ANAB to investigate • 2-3 • No Action • <2

  22. CB Name: XXX -2011

  23. CB Name: XXX -2011 ANAB Additional Comments

  24. Questions

More Related