slide1
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Stephan de Roode and Johan van der Dussen Delft University of Technology , Netherlands

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 18

Stephan de Roode and Johan van der Dussen Delft University of Technology , Netherlands - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 151 Views
  • Uploaded on

The EUCLIPSE/GCSS model intercomparison study of a stratocumulus to cumulus cloud transition as observed during ASTEX. Stephan de Roode and Johan van der Dussen Delft University of Technology , Netherlands http://www.euclipse.nl/.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Stephan de Roode and Johan van der Dussen Delft University of Technology , Netherlands' - shalin


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1
The EUCLIPSE/GCSS model intercomparison study of a stratocumulus to cumulus cloud transition as observed during ASTEX

Stephan de Roode and Johan van der Dussen

Delft University of Technology, Netherlands

http://www.euclipse.nl/

slide2
Current boundary-layer cloud model intercomparison studies for large-eddy simulation and single-column models

CGILS(steady state solutions of stratocumulus and cumulus)

- aim: understand cloud-climate feedback for DSST=+2K

Lagrangian cloud transitions (SST increases along the trajectory)

- ASTEX (aircraft) and composite cases (cloud fraction from satellite)

- aim: understand and validate modeling results of cloud regime transition

This talk:

- Subsidence, entrainment, and cloud layer depth evolution

astex transition large scale divergence difficult to quantify from the ecmwf model
ASTEX transition: Large-scale divergence difficult to quantify from the ECMWF model

Large-scale divergence: is it important for the stratocumulus-to-cumulus transition?

mean state evolution liquid water potential temperature

Divergence from ERA-40 (changing sign)

Divergence constant (5×10-6 s-1)

t = 3 hr t = 8 hr t = 20 hr t = 36 hr

Mean state evolution: liquid water potential temperature

 t > 20 hr : boundary height differs considerably

slide5

ASTEX Lagrangian: Dutch Atmospheric Large-Eddy Simulation Results

Divergence from ERA-40 (changing sign)

Divergence constant (5×10-6 s-1)

we (cm/s)

LWP (g/m2)

cloud break up for case with larger divergence

slide6

Entrainment of dry and warm air from above the inversion:

 cloud top height (ztop) rises

 cloud base height (zbase) rises

Cloud deepening:

slide7

Cloud layer depth evolution

qT

cloud top

qsat

z (m)

cloud base

(g/kg)

slide8

Specific humidity

Example: entrainment drying

qT

qsat

cloud top rises

z (m)

cloud base rises

(g/kg)

slide9

Example: longwave radiative cooling,

saturation specific humidity decreases

 Randall: in some cases cloud layer depth can increase by entrainment only

 This presentation: consider all heat and moisture fluxes

qT

qsat

z (m)

lower cloud base height

(g/kg)

slide10

Cloud base and top height evolution for a well-mixed cloud layer

Entrainment warming –

Cloud thinning

Rad cooling –

Cloud thickening

Entrainment drying –

Cloud thinning

Moistening –

Cloud thickening

Cloud deepening

by entrainment

Drizzle –

Cloud thinning

Subsidence -

Cloud thinning

slide11

Cloud base and top height evolution for ASTEX as a function of the entrainment rate

rcp<w\'qL\'>zbase = 11 W/m2 , rLv<w\'qT\'>zbase = 60 W/m2

DqL = 5 K , DqT = -1.1 g/kg

DLW = 74 W/m2

Div = 5 x 10-6 s-1

zbase = 300 m , ztop= 600 m

slide12

Cloud base and top height evolution for ASTEX as a function of the entrainment rate

rcp<w\'qL\'>zbase = 11 W/m2 , rLv<w\'qT\'>zbase = 60 W/m2

DqL = 5 K , DqT = -1.1 g/kg

DLW = 74 W/m2

Div = 5 x 10-6 s-1

zbase = 300 m , ztop= 600 m

slide13

Cloud base and top height evolution for ASTEX as a function of the entrainment rate

cloud layer thickness growths for went < 1.9 cm/s

slide14

Example: DYCOMS II RF01

For went > 0.4 cm/s,

cloud layer rapidly thins

rcp<w\'qL\'>zbase = 11 W/m2 , rLv<w\'qT\'>zbase = 60 W/m2

DqL = 8.5 K , DqT = -7.5 g/kg

DLW = 74 W/m2

Div = 5 x 10-6 s-1

zbase = 500 m , ztop= 800 m

steady state cloud layer depth equilibrium entrainment rates
Steady-state cloud layer depth: equilibrium entrainment rates

equilibrium entrainment rate

ASTEX

DYCOMS II RF01

rcp<w\'qL\'>zbase = 11 W/m2 , rLv<w\'qT\'>zbase = 80 W/m2

DLW = 70 W/m2

Div = 5 x 10-6 s-1

zbase = 300 m , zi= 650 m

steady state cloud layer depth equilibrium entrainment rates1
Steady-state cloud layer depth: equilibrium entrainment rates

equilibrium entrainment rate

entrainment rate (Nicholls and Turton, 1986)

ASTEX

DYCOMS II RF01

rcp<w\'qL\'>zbase = 11 W/m2 , rLv<w\'qT\'>zbase = 80 W/m2

DLW = 70 W/m2

Div = 5 x 10-6 s-1

zbase = 300 m , zi= 650 m

steady state cloud layer depth equilibrium entrainment rates2
Steady-state cloud layer depth: equilibrium entrainment rates

equilibrium entrainment rate

ASTEX

DYCOMS II RF01

Cloud top height decreases

(entrainment smaller than subsidence)

rcp<w\'qL\'>zbase = 11 W/m2 , rLv<w\'qT\'>zbase = 80 W/m2

DLW = 70 W/m2

Div = 5 x 10-6 s-1

zbase = 500 m , zi= 800 m

conclusions
Conclusions

 Large-scale divergence is important for the evolution of the stratocumulus cloud deck

 In a large part of the regime where the cloud layer depth is in a steady state the cloud top increases with time

Acknowledgements

The EUCLIPSE project is an international effort, funded under Framework Program 7 of the European Union

 NWO-NCF has sponsored the use of the Dutch Supercomputer "Huygens"

 Irina Sandu (MPI), Chris Bretherton (UW), and Adrian Lock (UKMO) are thanked for their help setting up the ASTEX intercomparison case

ad