Moving from state assessments to common core kansas act state organization 2012 annual conference
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 40

Tom Foster Kansas State Department of Education PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 83 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Moving from State Assessments to Common Core Kansas ACT State Organization 2012 Annual Conference. Tom Foster Kansas State Department of Education. Rate Your Prior Knowledge. 0—I’ve never heard of Common Core Standards. 1—I’ve heard the phrase but know nothing about it.

Download Presentation

Tom Foster Kansas State Department of Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Moving from state assessments to common core kansas act state organization 2012 annual conference

Moving from State Assessments to Common CoreKansas ACT State Organization 2012 Annual Conference

Tom Foster

Kansas State Department of Education


Rate your prior knowledge

Rate Your Prior Knowledge

  • 0—I’ve never heard of Common Core Standards.

  • 1—I’ve heard the phrase but know nothing about it.

  • 2—They are our new standards for math and

    ELA but I know little else.

  • 3—I’ve at least scanned the Standards document

    and know just enough to be dangerous!

  • 4—I’ve read the Standards document and can use

    the terms “anchor standard” and “boxed

    subheading” correctly.

  • 5—I know the standards backwards and forwards.


Common core state standards a new foundation for student success

Common Core State Standards: A New Foundation for Student Success

  • http://youtu.be/9IGD9oLofks


Rumor control and burning questions

Rumor Control and “Burning Questions”

In small groups, take two to three minutes to brainstorm a list of rumors you’ve heard and/or “burning questions” that you have about the Common Core Standards.

  • I heard these standards will require second graders to read Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath. Is that true? (No.)

  • Aren’t these “national standards” and the first step toward a “national curriculum?” (Absolutely not.)

  • Will new tests eventually be created to assess students on the standards? (Certainly, Kansas was due for new standards and new assessments anyway.)

Source:


The common core state standards initiative

The Common Core State Standards Initiative

  • Beginning in the spring of 2009, Governors and state commissioners of education from 48 states, 2 territories and the District of Columbia committed to developing a common core of state K-12 English-language arts (ELA) and mathematics standards.

  • The Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI) is a state-led effort coordinated by the National Governors Association (NGA) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO).

  • The Kansas State Board of Education formally adopted the Common Core State Standards for mathematics and English language arts on October 12, 2010.


Benefits for students

Benefits for Students

  • Student mobility—comparable education regardless of zip code

  • Increased alignment between K-12 and post-secondary narrows gap between high school and college and career readiness


Benefits to schools

Benefits to Schools

  • New and better assessments that better measure student learning

  • Student mobility—increased likelihood of comparable assessments between states allows for longitudinal data tracking

  • Easier collaboration among states on curriculum, instruction, and assessment

  • Shifting of resources to focus on improving instructional practices


A new generation of standards for college and career readiness

A New Generation of Standards for College and Career Readiness

  • Advance instruction – shift focus from AYP to CCR

  • Cultivate habits of mind – approaches to learning that are intellectual, practical, and spur student success

  • Facilitate collaboration – among students, among disciplines, among states

These standards are our renewed opportunities to:


Tom foster kansas state department of education

English Language Arts

and

Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects


Kansas advantages to common core standards in ela and literacy

Kansas Advantages to Common Core Standards in ELA and Literacy

  • A focus on college and career readiness (CCR)

  • Inclusion of the four strands of English Language Arts:

    • Reading

    • Writing

    • Listening and speaking

    • Language

  • The benefits of an integrated literacy approach – all Kansas educators have a shared responsibility for literacy instruction, regardless of discipline or content area.

  • A focus on results rather than means –“the Standards leave room for teachers, curriculum developers, and states to determine how those goals should be reached and what additional topics should be addressed” (p. 4).


  • Hallmarks of college and career readiness in english language arts and literacy

    Hallmarks of College and Career Readiness in English Language Arts and Literacy

    College and Career Ready Students:

    • Demonstrate independence in “the 4 C’s”

      • Comprehend complex text

      • Critique the craft used to create text

      • Construct rich understandings of content

      • Convey multifaceted meaning

  • Build strong content knowledge through research and study

  • Respond to varying demands of audience, purpose, task, and discipline in both writing and speaking

  • Use technology and digital media strategically to deepen encounters with text and to present and share information

  • Come to understand other perspective and cultures

  • Source: Adapted from “Students Who are College and Career Ready…” (page 7 of the Standards)


    Key advances for english language arts and literacy

    Key Advances for English Language Arts and Literacy

    Reading

    • Balance of literature and informational texts

    • A focus on appropriate levels of text complexity

      Writing

    • Emphasis on argument and informative/explanatory writing

    • Writing about sources and supplying evidence for claims and ideas

      Standards for literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects

    • Complement rather than replace content standards in those subjects

    • Shared responsibility of all educators regardless of discipline


    Tom foster kansas state department of education

    Mathematics


    Mathematical practices

    Mathematical Practices

    • Rewards instructional best practices

    • Clear vision of how students should approach and learn mathematics.

    • Shifts focus to ensuring mathematical understanding over computation skills


    Mathematical practices the list

    Mathematical Practices (the list)

    • Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them.

    • Reason abstractly and quantitatively.

    • Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others.

    • Model with mathematics.

    • Use appropriate tools strategically.

    • Attend to precision.

    • Look for and make use of structure.

    • Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning


    About the critical areas

    About the Critical Areas

    • Broad topics that can be used to organize instruction around for the entire year

    • Closely aligned to NCTM’s Focal Points document

    • Can be used as a focus for transition planning


    Tom foster kansas state department of education

    Resources


    Websites

    Websites

    • www.corestandards.org

    • www.ksde.org/kscommoncore

    • www.ksde.org/Default.aspx?tabid=4605


    Tom foster kansas state department of education

    • Transition timeline

    Source:

    Document available at: http://www.ksde.org/Default.aspx?tabid=4605


    Common assessments for the common core state standards

    Common Assessments for the

    Common Core State Standards

    Tom Foster

    Kansas State Department of Education


    State led governance

    • Governors

    • Education Chiefs

    • State Legislatures

    • State Boards of Education

    • 2 elected co-chairs

    • 4 representatives elected by governing states

    • Lead procurement state (WA)

    • Higher education representative

    State-Led Governance

    States Join Consortium as Governing or Advisory State

    State Representatives Serve on Executive Committee

    SMARTER Staff

    WestEd, Project Management Partner

    Advisory Committees


    State involvement in getting the work done consortium work groups

    Accessibility and Accommodations

    Work group engagement of 90 state-level staff:

    State Involvement in Getting the Work Done: Consortium Work Groups

    Formative Assessment Practices and Professional Learning

    Item Development

    • Each work group:

    • Led by co-chairs from governing states

    • 6 or more members from advisory or governing states

    • 1 liaison from the Executive Committee

    • 1 WestEd partner

    Performance Tasks

    1

    Work group responsibilities:

    Reporting

    2

    Technology Approach

    • Define scope and time line for work in its area

    • Develop a work plan and resource requirements

    • Determine and monitor the allocated budget

    • Oversee Consortium work in its area, including identification and direction of vendors

    3

    Test Administration

    4

    Test Design

    5

    Transition to Common Core State Standards

    6

    Validation and Psychometrics

    7

    8

    9

    10


    Higher education partners involved in application

    Higher Education Partners Involved in Application

    • 175public and 13 private systems/institutions of higher education

    • Representing 74% of the total number of direct matriculation students across all SMARTER Balanced States

    • Higher education representatives and/or postsecondary faculty serve on:

      • Executive Committee

      • Assessment scoring and item review committees

      • Standard-setting committees

    • Two directors for higher education engagement to start in mid-October; higher education advisory panel now forming


    Tom foster kansas state department of education

    SMARTER Balanced Approach


    Seven key principles

    Seven Key Principles

    • An integrated system

    • Evidence-based approach

    • Teacher involvement

    • State-led with transparent governance

    • Focus: improving teaching and learning

    • Actionable information – multiple measures

    • Established professional standards


    A balanced assessment system

    A Balanced Assessment System

    Summative assessments

    Benchmarked to college and career readiness

    Teachers and schools have information and tools they need to improve teaching and learning

    Common Core State Standards specify

    K-12 expectations for college and career readiness

    All students leave high school college and career ready

    Teacher resources for

    formative assessment practices

    to improve instruction

    Interim assessments Flexible, open, used for actionable feedback


    A balanced assessment system1

    A Balanced Assessment System


    Using computer adaptive technology for summative and interim assessments

    Faster results

    • Turnaround in weeks compared to months today

    Using Computer Adaptive Technology for Summative and Interim Assessments

    Shorter test length

    • Fewer questions compared to fixed form tests

    Increased precision

    • Provides accurate measurements of student growth over time

    Tailored to student ability

    • Item difficulty based on student responses

    Greater security

    • Larger item banks mean that not all students receive the same questions

    Mature technology

    • GMAT, GRE, COMPASS (ACT), Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)


    Assessment system components

    Summative Assessment (Computer Adaptive)

    Assessment System Components

    • Assesses thefull range of Common Corein English language arts and mathematics for students in grades 3–8 and 11 (interim assessments can be used in grades 9 and 10)

    • Measures current student achievement and growth across time, showing progress toward college and career readiness

    • Can be given once or twice a year (mandatory testing window within the last 12 weeks of the instructional year)

    • Includes a variety of question types: selected response, short constructed response, extended constructed response, technology enhanced, and performance tasks


    Assessment system components1

    Interim Assessment (Computer Adaptive)

    Assessment System Components

    • Optional comprehensive and content-cluster assessment to help identify specific needs of each student

    • Can be administered throughout the year

    • Provides clear examples of expected performance on Common Core standards

    • Includes a variety of question types: selected response, short constructed response, extended constructed response, technology enhanced, and performance tasks

    • Aligned to and reported on the same scale as the summative assessments

    • Fully accessible for instruction and professional development


    Assessment system components2

    Performance Tasks

    Assessment System Components

    • Extended projects demonstrate real-world writing and analytical skills

    • May include online research, group projects, presentations

    • Require 1-2 class periods to complete

    • Included in both interim and summative assessments

    • Applicable in all grades being assessed

    • Evaluated by teachers using consistent scoring rubrics

    The use of performance measures has been found

    to increase the intellectual challenge in classrooms

    and to support higher-quality teaching.

    - Linda Darling-Hammond and Frank Adamson, Stanford University


    Assessment system components3

    Few initiatives are backed by evidence that they raise achievement. Formative assessment is one of the few approaches

    proven to make a difference.

    - Stephanie Hirsh, Learning Forward

    Formative Assessment Practices

    Assessment System Components

    • Research-based, on-demand tools and resources for teachers

    • Aligned to Common Core, focused on increasing student learning and enabling differentiation of instruction

    • Professional development materials include model units of instruction and publicly released assessment items, formative strategies


    Assessment system components4

    Data are only useful if people are able to access, understand and use them… For information to be useful, it must be timely, readily available, and easy to understand.

    -Data Quality Campaign

    Online Reporting

    Assessment System Components

    • Static and dynamic reports, secure and public views

    • Individual states retain jurisdiction over access and appearance of online reports

    • Dashboard gives parents, students, practitioners, and policymakers access to assessment information

    • Graphical display of learning progression status (interim assessment)

    • Feedback and evaluation mechanism provides surveys, open feedback, and vetting of materials


    Support for special populations

    Support for Special Populations

    • Accurate measures of progress for students with disabilities and English Language Learners

    • Accessibility and Accommodations Work Group engaged throughout development

    • Outreach and collaboration with relevant associations

    Common-

    Core Tests

    to Have Built-in

    Accommodations

    - June 8, 2011


    Timeline

    Timeline

    Master Plan Developed and Work Groups Launched

    Formative Processes, Tools, and Practices Development Begins

    Item Writing and Review Activities Completed (Summative and Interim)

    Field Testing of Summative Assessment Administered

    Final Achievement Standards (Summative) Verified and Adopted

    2010-2011

    School Year

    2011-2012

    School Year

    2012-2013

    School Year

    2013-2014

    School Year

    2014-2015

    School Year

    Operational Summative Assessment Administered

    Preliminary Achievement Standards (Summative) Proposed and Other Policy Definitions Adopted

    Pilot Testing of Summative and Interim Assessments Conducted

    Common Core Translation and Item Specifications Complete

    Common Core State Standards Adopted by All States


    Procurement schedule from master work plan

    Procurement Schedule from Master Work Plan


    State implementation timeline

    State Implementation: Timeline

    Teams of teachers evaluate formative assessment practices and curriculum resources

    Technology readiness tool available

    Field testing of summative assessment, training school- and district-level staff in formative tools

    Full implementation of assessment system

    2011-2012

    School Year

    2012-2013

    School Year

    2013-2014

    School Year

    2014-2015

    School Year

    Formative tools available to teachers


    To find out more

    To find out more...

    ...the SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium can be found online at

    www.smarterbalanced.org


  • Login