1 / 16

Eyewitness Testimony PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Presentation posted in: General

Eyewitness Testimony. Reconstructive memory Schema driven errors Effect of leading questions Other factors Weapon focus Effects of anxiety/arousal Retrieval cues. Reconstructive Memory. Bartlett (1932) Memory is not a direct record of what was witnessed - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Download Presentation

Eyewitness Testimony

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Eyewitness testimony l.jpg

Eyewitness Testimony

  • Reconstructive memory

    • Schema driven errors

  • Effect of leading questions

  • Other factors

    • Weapon focus

    • Effects of anxiety/arousal

    • Retrieval cues

Reconstructive memory l.jpg

Reconstructive Memory

  • Bartlett (1932)

  • Memory is not a direct record of what was witnessed

  • What is encoded and how it is retrieved depends on:

    • Information already stored in memory

    • How this info is understood, structured and organised

Reconstructive memory3 l.jpg

Reconstructive Memory

  • Schemas

    • Knowledge structures that relate to commonly encountered objects, situations or people

    • Enable us to predict events, make sense of unfamiliar circumstances, organise our own behaviour

    • Act as filters to perception & recall

Computer information processing l.jpg

Computer Information Processing


Can you wreck a nice beach?

Schema driven processing l.jpg

Can you wreck a nice beach?

Schema Driven Processing

Yes. I can recognise speech.

Bartlett 1932 l.jpg





‘Turf cutter’

Bartlett (1932)

Bartlett (1932)

Bartlett 19327 l.jpg

Bartlett (1932)

  • War of the Ghosts

  • When recalled by UK PPs:

    • Shorter

    • Less detailed

    • Some details changed (e.g. seal hunting changed to fishing)

    • More ‘Western’ structure

Ewt schema driven errors l.jpg

EWT: Schema Driven Errors

  • Witnesses to crimes filter information during acquisition & recall

    • Their schematic understanding may influence how info is both stored & retrieved

    • Distortions may occur without the witness realising

Ewt schema driven errors9 l.jpg

EWT: Schema Driven Errors

  • Past experiences

  • Assumptions about what usually happens

  • Stereotypes & beliefs about crime & criminals

Ewt leading questions l.jpg

EWT: Leading Questions

  • Loftus (1970s onwards)

  • Effect of leading questions on recall

    • Leading questions introduce new information

    • Leading info may activate wrong schemas in witness’ mind

    • Consequently, witness may recall events incorrectly

Ewt leading questions11 l.jpg

EWT: Leading Questions

  • Loftus’ studies using film/video/slides road accidents

  • ‘How fast were cars going when they hit…’ or ‘…when they smashed…’?

    • ‘Smashed’ led to higher speed estimates

  • ‘Did you see a/the broken headlight’?

    • ‘The’ produced more affirmative (incorrect) responses

Ewt leading questions12 l.jpg

EWT: Leading Questions

  • Loftus’ research usually lab based:

    • Restricted samples (students)

    • Artificial stimuli (slides, videos, not real events)

    • Potential for demand characteristics to influence responses

    • No legal/moral consequences for inaccurate answers

Ewt leading questions13 l.jpg

EWT: Leading Questions

  • EWT most affected by leading Qs when:

    • Witness believes questioner knows more than them

    • Witness does not realise they may be misled

    • Leading information is peripheral, not central

    • Leading information is not blatantly incorrect

Ewt weapon focus l.jpg

EWT: Weapon Focus

  • When a weapon is used to threaten a victim, their attention is likely to focus on it

  • Consequently, their recall of other information is likely to be poor

Ewt arousal effects l.jpg

EWT: Arousal Effects

  • Memory is most effective at moderate arousal levels

  • If the witness was in a state of extremely low or high arousal then recall may be poor



Ewt retrieval cues l.jpg

EWT: Retrieval Cues

  • Recall typically takes place in a different context to acquisition

    • Lack of retrieval cues (state and context) can inhibit recall

    • Reconstruction of the events (either imagination or simulation) can lead to enhanced recall

  • Login