- 39 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Foundations of Software Design Fall 2002 Marti Hearst

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Lecture 11: Analysis of Algorithms, cont.

- In increasing order

Where does n log n fit in?

Adapted from Goodrich & Tamassia

Both x and y linear scales

Convert y axis to log scale

(that jump for large n happens because the last number is out of range)

Notice how much bigger 2^n is than n^k

This is why exponential growth is BAD BAD BAD!!

- A well-known “song”
- “100 bottles of beer on the wall, 100 bottles of beer; you take one down, pass it around, 99 bottles of beer on the wall.”
- “99 bottles of beer on the wall, 99 bottles of beer; you take one down, pass it around, 98 bottles of beer on the wall.”
- …
- “1 bottle of beer on the wall, 1 bottle of beer, you take it down, pass it around, no bottles of beer on the wall.”
- HALT.

- Let’s change the song to “N bottles of beer on the wall”. The number of bottles of beer passed around is Order what?

- Another song:
- The ants go marching 1 by 1
- The ants go marching 2 by 2
- The ants go marching 3 by 3

- How ants are in the lead in each wave of ants?
1 + 2 + 3 + … + n

- Does this remind you of anything?

Let’s plot beer(n) versus ants(n)

Ants

Definition of Big-Oh

A running time is O(g(n)) if there exist constants n0 > 0 and c > 0 such that for all problem sizes n > n0, the running time for a problem of size n is at most c(g(n)).

In other words, c(g(n)) is an upper bound on the running time for sufficiently large n.

c g(n)

http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~farid/teaching/cs15/cs5/lectures/0519/0519.html

One function starts out faster for small values of n.

But for n > n0, the other function is always faster.

Adapted from http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/~algorith/lectures-good/node2.html

- Let f(n) and g(n) be functions mapping nonnegative integers to real numbers.
- f(n) is (g(n)) if there exist positive constants n0 and c such that for all n>=n0,f(n) <= c*g(n)
- Other ways to say this:
f(n) is orderg(n)

f(n) is big-Oh ofg(n)

f(n) is Oh ofg(n)

f(n) O(g(n)) (set notation)

Adapted from Goodrich & Tamassia

- Given:
- A physical phone book
- Organized in alphabetical order

- A name you want to look up
- An algorithm in which you search through the book sequentially, from first page to last
- What is the order of:
- The best case running time?
- The worst case running time?
- The average case running time?

- What is:
- A better algorithm?
- The worst case running time for this algorithm?

- A physical phone book

- This better algorithm is called Binary Search
- What is its running time?
- First you look in the middle of n elements
- Then you look in the middle of n/2 = ½*n elements
- Then you look in the middle of ½ * ½*n elements
- …
- Continue until there is only 1 element left
- Say you did this m times: ½ * ½ * ½* …*n
- Then the number of repetitions is the smallest integer m such that

- In the worst case, the number of repetitions is the smallest integer m such that
- We can rewrite this as follows:

Multiply both sides by

Take the log of both sides

Since m is the worst case time, the algorithm is O(logn)

“prefix averages”

You want this mapping from array of numbers to an array of averages of the preceding numbers (who knows why – not my example):

- 10 15 20 25 30
5/1 15/2 30/3 50/4 75/5 105/6

There are two straightforward algorithms:

One is easy but wasteful.

The other is more efficient, but requires insight into the problem.

Adapted from Goodrich & Tamassia

Adapted from Goodrich & Tamassia

- For each position i in A, you look at the values for all the elements that came before
- What is the number of positions in the largest part?
- When i=n, you look at n positions
- When i=n-1, you look at n-1 positions
- When i=n-2, you look at n-2 positions
- …
- When i=2, you look at 2 positions
- When i=1, you look at 1 position

- This should look familiar …

A useful tool: store partial information in a variable!

Uses space to save time. The key – don’t divide s.

Eliminates one for loop – always a good thing to do.

Adapted from Goodrich & Tamassia

- A method for determining, in an abstract way, the asymptotic running time of an algorithm
- Here asymptotic means as n gets very large

- Useful for comparing algorithms
- Useful also for determing tractability
- Meaning, a way to determine if the problem is intractable (impossible) or not
- Exponential time algorithms are usually intractable.

- We’ll revisit these ideas throughout the rest of the course.

- Stacks and Queues