1 / 21

Pathways to Establish Programs of Study: A Process for Student Motivation and Intention

Pathways to Establish Programs of Study: A Process for Student Motivation and Intention. St. Louis Park High School. Greg Goddard Kara Mueller Academy Coordinators. The Beginning. Building Assets Reducing Risks (BARR ) Intentional Relationships/Data Verification

seth-horne
Download Presentation

Pathways to Establish Programs of Study: A Process for Student Motivation and Intention

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Pathways to Establish Programs of Study:AProcess for Student Motivation and Intention St. Louis Park High School Greg Goddard Kara Mueller Academy Coordinators

  2. The Beginning • Building Assets Reducing Risks (BARR) • Intentional Relationships/Data Verification • Small Learning Community Grant • Invest in Innovation (i3) • Developmental grant • Expansion of BARR • College and Career Readiness • A challenge to restructure a public high school • Outside evaluators

  3. Philosophy behind St. Louis Park High School Academy Design(Program of Study) • Middle student focus • Career exploration • Relevance (align to a program of study, learn pathway to college) • Relationships (BARR) • Rigor (align curriculum with local community college programs) • Experiential based education (project based curriculum) • Economic Indicators* Build on the legacy of St. Louis Park High School’s success Establish Collaborative Relationships Create and maintain a postsecondary going culture for all students Create a process to facilitate the student's development of motivation, intention and implementation Modernized responsive program of study blending structure with process

  4. (I) Build on our Legacy • Nationally ranked High School • Strong college prep program (IB, AP) • Several nationally recognized programs and staff • BARR – Building Assets Reducing Risks • School of Innovation • Recipients of i3 Grant (Invest in Innovation) HOWEVER • Recognized gap in meeting the needs of “ALL” • Weak in the development and delivery of college and career programming • Disconnected Electives

  5. (II) Establish Collaborative Relationships • MnScu • Centers of Excellence • Business • Advisory Boards “Tonight, I’m announcing a new challenge to redesign America’s high schools so they better equip graduates for the demands of a high-tech economy. We’ll reward schools that develop new partnerships with colleges and employers, and create classes that focus on science, technology, engineering, and math – the skills today’s employers are looking for to fill jobs right now and in the future.”(President Obama’s 2013 State of the Union Address)

  6. (III) Create and Maintain a Postsecondary Going Culture for All Students • Culture of Building (beliefs, perceptions, and intentions) • Workforce development – Student and Staff • College and Career Credit • Scaffold curriculum http://www.slpsparksonline.org/ • Advisory (60+ High School Teachers, Every student) • Academic and Goal Advisement (BARR) • Classroom lessons with outside requirements (32 Lessons) • Tech Tasks (Naviance) • College and Career Counselor with Career Center • Establishment of Academy (POS)

  7. (IV) Create a process to facilitate the student's development of motivation, intention and implementation

  8. Behavioral Beliefs and Outcome Evaluations:  Is working hard now in school toward a future goal worthwhile?  Do I like going to school and working hard? Attribution Theory of College and Career Readiness My Overall Attitude about Striving toward a Future Goal School-Setting Factors Injunctive and Descriptive Normative Beliefs:  Do people think I should work hard toward a future goal?  Do most people like me work hard toward a future goal? Striving Each Day to do My Best toward a Future Goal My Intention to do My Best in School to Prepare for a Future Goal My Social Norms about Future Goals Control Beliefs and Perceived:  Do I have the skills necessary to succeed in school for a future goal?  If I really wanted to, could I succeed in achieving a future goal? My Self-Efficacy with Future Goals Learning Skills and Abilities

  9. (V) Modernized Responsive Program of Study Blending Structure with Process • Academy Model (POS) • 10th Grade • 11/12th Grades

  10. Academy Structure (POS) Started Fall of 2012 Starting Fall of 2013

  11. Sophomore Foundation Courses • Collaborated with Minnesota State College and University System (MNSCU) to design academy courses. • Foundation course must haves: • College & Career Exploration Units • Ethics Unit • Specific Course Curriculum (project based) • Relationship Establishment – BARR Training • Evaluation • Student Survey

  12. 11th Grade Academy Design • Collaborated with Minnesota State College and University System (MNSCU) to design academy courses. • Designed 11th grade academy courses: • Created new or redesigned courses • Added an Engineering pathway • Collected feedback from teachers • College going experience • On going staff development (SLPH, MNSCU) • Articulation agreements

  13. Measures of Success Internal and External Evaluations (qualitative & quantitative): • Students know about their academic standing • Students are challenging themselves in their classes • Students have post-graduation aspirations • Students are informed about the knowledge and skills needed to be ready for post-graduation aspiration and how their ambitions are related to their academic levels • Students have engaged in a dialog with an informed person in and outside of school about their future prospects following graduation

  14. 10thGrade Foundation Survey

  15. Ongoing and ContinuedAcademy Work • Continued collaboration with MNSCU Deans and Instructors • Professional learning opportunities for staff (Workforce Development) • Create 12th grade academy courses • Build additional articulation agreements • Academy programming evaluation(s) • Identify resource needs for academy courses • Continued curriculum work (release time, summer hours) • Plan and Create Experiential Opportunities • Advisory Board(s) (Business, Industry & Post-secondary) • Promotion

  16. Implications & Take Away • Driving the bus while building it • Culture of the school • Staffing FTE • Registration numbers (free market) • Elective offerings more focused • Course evaluations – does it meet a program of study (modernize) • New classes/redesign of existing courses • Dropped classes (disconnected electives) • Teacher assignments and schedules have changed • +/- • Academic and CTE relationship

  17. Policy Recommendations • Growth Model for Schools • Incentive for success • Mechanism to share strengths of successful schools • Overcoming legacy barriers • Difficult to quickly respond to the demands of industry • Additional Resources/Reallocation of Resources • Teacher licensure • Teacher professional learning opportunities and expectations • Structure with Process • Attribution Theory • Program of Study • Workforce development • Teacher training programs (workforce indicators) • Communication and Collaboration between Secondary, Post-Secondary and Business

  18. Academy Coordinators Greg Goddard and Kara Mueller goddard.greg@slpschools.org, mueller.kara@slpschools.org

  19. Economic Indicators

More Related