1 / 27

Overview of New England’s Proposed Forward Capacity Market Settlement (a/k/a “LICAP Settlement”)

Overview of New England’s Proposed Forward Capacity Market Settlement (a/k/a “LICAP Settlement”). David T. Doot April 26, 2006. The Forward Capacity Market Settlement. Background Overview of the Forward Capacity Market (“FCM”) Settlement Agreement (a/k/a “LICAP Settlement”)

serge
Download Presentation

Overview of New England’s Proposed Forward Capacity Market Settlement (a/k/a “LICAP Settlement”)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Overview of New England’s Proposed Forward Capacity Market Settlement (a/k/a “LICAP Settlement”) David T. Doot April 26, 2006

  2. The Forward Capacity Market Settlement • Background • Overview of the Forward Capacity Market (“FCM”) Settlement Agreement (a/k/a “LICAP Settlement”) • Timing Considerations

  3. Background The FERC Has Required Changes to the Existing New England Capacity Market • Revenues determined insufficient to support continued operation of necessary generation • PUSH bidding did not work • At present, 45 units in New England comprising over 6,200 MWs are under Reliability Must Run (RMR) agreements — with potentially more to come

  4. Background The LICAP Proposal • ISO proposed Locational Installed Capacity (“LICAP”) mechanism in 2004 • After extensive hearings, ALJ concluded in June 2005 Initial Decision that LICAP (with adjustments) was just and reasonable • Based on reaction to Initial Decision, FERC • delayed implementation to no earlier than October 2006 • heard oral arguments on alternatives to LICAP • granted requests for settlement proceedings

  5. Background • LICAP Settlement Proceedings • More than 30 days of formal settlement conferences between October 2005 and March 2006 • 175 Representatives – all six New England state regulatory agencies, the ISO and stakeholders • March 6, 2006: Settlement Agreement filed • March 27 and April 5, 2006: Comments filed • April 11, 2006: Settlement Judge’s Report filed

  6. Background March 6, 2006 Settlement Agreement – the FCM Settlement Agreement • Requests FERC approval on or before June 30, 2006 • Of 115 Parties to the LICAP Proceeding: • 61 Parties signed the Settlement Agreement • 8 Parties filed comments opposing the Settlement Agreement • Remaining 46 Parties neither signed nor opposed (legally waived all opposition) • Opposition from the Maine PUC, Maine Public Advocate and Attorneys Generals in Connecticut and Massachusetts, as well as NSTAR and three consumer coalitions

  7. The Forward Capacity Market Settlement • Highlights of Settlement Agreement • Competitive “Descending Clock” Auction to determine capacity price • Capacity secured three years in advance for single and multi-year “Commitment Periods” • Availability penalties and credits • Fixed Transition Payments from 12/06 to start of first Commitment Period • Bilateral Trading allowed • Self-Supply Option

  8. Forward Capacity Auction (“FCA”) • Annual FCA to secure 100% of the Installed Capacity Requirement (“ICR”) • Capacity Payments begin approximately three years after FCA • First FCA planned for 1Q of 2008 for Commitment Period beginning Power Year 2010/2011 (i.e. June 1, 2010 to May 31, 2011) • Annual and monthly “Reconfiguration Auctions” as Commitment Period nears

  9. FCA – Commitment Periods • New Capacity can be committed for a period of up to five years (one-year increments) • Extended period minimizes investment risk • Existing and Import Capacity committed for only one year • Some previously listed capacity may be considered New Capacity (e.g., new investment, re-powering, incremental output, new source review)

  10. FCA – “Qualified Capacity” “Qualified Capacity” is capacity that can clear in a FCA as follows: • Existing Capacity equal to Summer Seasonal Claimed Capability • Option to de-list all or portion of Existing Capacity • New Capacity equal to its bid MWs (subject to demonstration) • Distinct methods to be developed to determined Qualified Capacity for Intermittent and Demand Resources

  11. FCA – Qualification Requirements • New Capacity: site control, critical path schedule (including milestone criteria), initial interconnection analysis, financial assurance • New Import Capacity (i.e., no multi-year contract): backed by physical unit or external control area, financial assurance • Existing Capacity: financial assurance, possible market monitor review (depending on bid(s)) • Self-Supplied Resources (from LSEs) must meet same qualification standards

  12. FCA – Financial Assurance Requirements • In general, governed by existing financial assurance requirements • New Capacity to provide up to 3X of expected monthly capacity payments • New Capacity has right to cover defaults up to a period of two years • Provisions to ensure price and payment certainty and finality

  13. FCA – Descending Clock Auction - Overview • Auction starts with pre-determined price – 2X the cost of New Entry (“CONE”) • CONE is initially set at $7.50/kw-month • If more Resources are bid than are needed to meet ICR, price is lowered and bidding begins again • Continue lowering price and bidding until the Qualified Capacity of Resources bid equals ICR, which establishes the “Capacity Clearing Price”

  14. FCA – Descending Clock Auction - Details • New Capacity and unit-specific bids from Existing Capacity to be taken or rejected in whole, unless otherwise specified by bidder • CONE is reset each year for subsequent FCAs based on past Capacity Clearing Prices • Price Protections • Rules to address FCA failures due to inadequate supply or insufficient competition • Special pricing rules to address potential for initial auction failures • Collar on capacity prices for first five FCAs (or first three successful FCAs)

  15. FCA – Locational Mechanism • ISO to determine in advance whether separate Capacity Zones are needed based on an identification of transmission limits that may bind in the FCA • If separate Capacity Zones, the ISO will conduct separate but simultaneous FCAs for each Zone, which allows for price separation • No forced Capacity Zones

  16. FCA – Auction Bids • Existing Capacity may export, de-list or permanently de-list all or portions of capacity (subject to market monitor review) • Capacity to replace export, de-list or permanently de-listed capacity may be committed in subsequent Reconfiguration Auctions • Import bids subject to market monitor review • Export, de-list or permanently de-list bids may be rejected for reliability reasons

  17. FCA – Reconfiguration Auctions • Annual and Monthly Reconfiguration Auctions • Monthly auctions prior to June and October allow for whole season commitments • Allows for adjustments due to de-list, permanently de-list and export bids, as well as increases or decreases in ICR • Physical resources can trade capacity commitments

  18. Rights and Obligations in FCM • Committed Capacity (i.e., listed) must offer into both Day-Ahead and Real-Time Markets • In general, Day-Ahead offers must have sum of start time plus min run time plus min down time that is less than or equal to 72 hours • Offers must reflect then-known, unit-specific operating characteristics • Penalty structure for violations of offer requirements • Economic outages not permitted • De-listed resources not required to offer, but if offered into Day-Ahead, subject to same rules as all other Resources

  19. Capacity Payments • Monthly payments • Multi-year Commitment Periods adjusted for inflation • Capacity Payments will be reduced by Peak Energy Rents (“PER”) • Energy payments that would have been received by “proxy unit” • Initial proxy unit presumed to have 22,000 BTU/kWh heat rate • PER adjustments will be 12-month rolling average

  20. Adjustments for Availability • Payments adjusted to reflect performance of units during “Shortage Events” • System-wide Reserve Constraint Penalty Factors (“RCPFs”) trigger Shortage Events • Penalties assessed for unavailability • Penalties per event equal 5% of yearly payment and are increased by 1% per hour for events that exceed five hours • Total penalties for one day not to exceed 10% of yearly payment • Total penalties for one month not to exceed 2.5 times that total monthly payment • Total penalties cannot exceed annual FCA payments (less PER deduction)

  21. Adjustments for Availability • Penalties redistributed to Resources that were available during Shortage Event • In general, Resources available with notification plus start-up time of 30 minutes or less • Intermittent and Demand Resources not subject to availability penalties and credits

  22. Transition Period • Existing UCAP Products in place through May 30, 2010 • Fixed Transition Payments (No PER deductions) 12/01/06 – 5/31/07 $3.05/kW-month 06/01/07 – 5/31/08 $3.05/kW-month 06/01/08 – 5/31/09 $3.75/kW-month 06/01/09 – 5/31/10 $4.10/kW-month

  23. Transition Period • Availability measured by a weighted EFORd approach • Transition Payments netted against RMR Payments • Suppliers allowed to partially de-list or export units • $4.70/kW-month payment in 2010/2011 if no FCA held (or it fails)

  24. Additional Settlement Provisions • External Resources to participate in FCM and Transition Period on a basis comparable to internal Resources • For FCM, bid and offer deadlines for Day-Ahead, posting of results and RAA process rolled back to earlier time periods during Dec, Jan and Feb (results targeted by 10:30 am) • For FCM, procurement of additional Supplemental Reserves from gas fired resources for Cold Weather Warnings or Events

  25. Additional Settlement Provisions • Discussions Remain Confidential • Waiver by Settling Parties through September 5, 2008 (possibly earlier if FCA becomes final) to file complaint to modify Settlement Agreement • Capacity Clearing Prices and Transition Period payments subject to Mobile-Sierra standard of review

  26. Timing Considerations • June 30, 2006 FERC approval or Settlement Agreement terminates • 30 days to renegotiate Settlement Agreement if FERC conditions or modifies • October 1, 2006 filing of Market Rule changes for Transition Period • 4Q of 2006 filing of process requirements to set ICR • February 15, 2007 filing of Market Rule changes for FCM

  27. Questions?

More Related