- 80 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

STOCHASTIC DOMINANCE APPROACH TO PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

STOCHASTIC DOMINANCE APPROACH TO PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION

Nesrin Alptekin

Anadolu University, TURKEY

- Mean-Variance Analysis
- Criticisms of Mean-Variance Analysis
- Stochastic Dominance Rule
- First Order Stochastic Dominance Rule
- Second Order Stochastic Dominance Rule

- Advantages of Stochastic Dominance Rules
- Stochastic Dominance Approach to Portfolio Optimization
- Quantile Form of Stochastic Dominance Rules
- Linear Programming Problem of Portfolio Optimization With SSD
- Further Remarks

- Maximize Return subject to Given Variance

Subject to

- Minimize Variance (risk) subject to Given Return

Subject to

Criticisms of Mean-Variance Analysis

- Mean-variance rules are not consistent with axioms of rational choice.
- Probability distribution of returns is normal.
- Decision maker’s utility function is quadratic. Beyond some wealth level the decision maker’s marginal utility becomes negative.
- When considering the risk, variance which is the risk measure of mean-variance rule, is not always appropiate risk measure, because of left sided fat tails in return distributions.

- According to this rule, the random variable X will be preferred over the random variable Y, if and
and there is at least one strict equality. However, with empirical data E(X) > E(Y) and

inequalities are common. In such cases, the mean-variance rule will be unable to distinguish between the random variables X and Y.

- Stochastic dominance approach allows the decision maker to judge a preference or random variable as more risky than another for an entire class of utility functions.
- Stochastic dominance is based on an axiomatic model of risk-averse preferences in utility theory.

- The decision maker has a preference ordering over all possible outcomes, represented by utility function of von-Neumann and Morgenstern.
- Two axioms of utility function are emphasized: the Monotonicity axiom which means more is better than less and the concavity axiom which means risk aversion.
- Stochastic dominance rule theory provides general rules which have common properties of utility functions.
- Suppose that X and Y are two random variables with distribution functions Fx and Gy, respectively.

- Random variable X first order stochastically dominates (FSD) the random variable Y if and only if Fx Gy.
- No matter what level of probability is considered, G always has a greater probability mass in the lower tail than does F.
- The random variable X first order stochastically dominates the random variable Y if for every monotone (increasing) function u: R R, then
is obtained. This is already shows that FSD can be viewed as a “stochastically larger” relationship.

FIRST ORDER STOCHASTIC DOMINANCE

- The random variable X second order stochastically dominates the random variable Y if and only if
for all k.

- X is preferred to Y by all risk-averse decision makers if the cumulative differences of returns over all states of nature favor Fx. The random variable X second order stochastically dominates the random variable Y if for u: R Rall monotone (increasing) and concave functions u: R R, that is; utility functions increasing at a decreasing rate with wealth:
, then is obtained.

Geometrically, up to every point k, the area under F is smaller than the

corresponding areas under G.

- Criteria have been developed for third degree stochastic dominance (TSD) by Whitmore (1970), and for mixtures of risky and riskless assets by Levy and Kroll (1976). However, the SSD criterion is considered the most important in portfolio selection.
- Stochastic dominance approach is useful both for normative analysis, where the objective is to support practical decision making process, as well as positive analysis, where the objective is to analyze the decision rules used by decision makers.

- Stochastic dominance approach uses entire probability distribution rather than two moments, so it can be considered less restrictive than the mean-variance approach.
- In stochastic dominance approach, there are no assumptions made concerning the form of the return distributions. If it is fully specified one of the most frequently used continuous distribution like normal distribution, the stochastic dominance approach tends to reduce to a simpler form (e.g., mean-variance rule) so that full-scale comparisons of empirical distributions are not needed. Also, not much information on decision makers’ preferences is needed to rank alternatives.

- From a bayesian perspective, when the true distributions of returns are unknown, the use of an empirical distribution function is justified by the von-Neumann and Morgenstern axioms.
- Stochastic dominance approach is consistent with a wide range of economic theories of choice under uncertainty, like expected utility theory, non-expected utility theory of Yaari’s, dual theory of risk, cumulative prospect theory and regret theory. However, mean variance analysis is consistent with the expected utility theory under relatively restrictive assumptions about investor preferences and/or the statistical distribution of the investments returns.

- In the stochastic dominance approach to portfolio optimization, it is considered stochastic dominance relations between random returns.
- Portfolio X dominates portfolio Y under the FSD
(first order stochastic dominance rule) if,

- Relation to utility functions:
X FSD Y

- Second order stochastic dominance rules are
consistent with risk-averse decisions in decision

theory.

For X and Y portfolios, risk-averse consistency:

X SSD Y

- Up to now, first and second order stochastic dominance rules are stated in terms of cumulative distributions denoted by F and G.

- They can be also restated in terms of distribution quantiles.

- These restatements allow to decision maker to diversify between risky asset and riskless assets.

- They are also more easily extended to the analysis of stochastic dominance among specific distributions of rates of return because such extensions are quite difficult in the cumulative distribution form.

Quantile Form of Stochastic Dominance Rules

- The Pth quantile of a distribution is defined as the smallest possible value Q(P) for hold:
- For X random variable, the accumulated value of probability P up to a specific x value is denoted by xP. Thus xP value is equal to Q(P), it is also Pth quantile.

Quantile Form of Stochastic Dominance Rules

- For a strictly increasing cumulative distribution denoted by F, the quantile is defined as the inverse function:
- Theorem 1: Let F and G be cumulative distributions of the return on two investments. Then F FSD G if and only if:
for all

Quantile Form of Stochastic Dominance Rules

- Theorem 2: Let F andG be two distributions under consideration
with quantiles and , respectively. Then F SSD G, if

and only if

for all

- Finally, this theorem holds for continuous and discrete distributions alike.

Q = , i = 1,…,M; j= 1,…,N+1 matrix of consisting of

the stratified sample of combinations of returns of a group

of N candidate assets

: weights of asset j, j = 1,…,N ( )

Using of the quantile form of the SSD criterion, define:

: reference return (market index, existing portfolio,etc.)

Maximize rP =

Subject to

- The objective function maximizes the expected return of the portfolio.
- The set of M constraints requires the computed portfolio to dominate the reference return by SSD.

- This work in progress. The next step is to find solving this problem in practice.
- For this LP problem of portfolio optimization with SSD, we need optimality and duality conditions.
- Finally, its computational results must be compared with M-V analysis consequences.