1 / 8

Divertor plasma detachment : a fresh look at a familiar problem…

Divertor plasma detachment : a fresh look at a familiar problem… W. Fundamenski (UKAEA, EFDA-JET) with contributions from M.Wischmeier (IPP), A.Kukushkin (ITER), S.Krashenninikov (UCSD), B.Lipschultz (MIT), S.Wiesen (FZJ). Scope of the present session.

sera
Download Presentation

Divertor plasma detachment : a fresh look at a familiar problem…

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Divertor plasma detachment : a fresh look at a familiar problem… W. Fundamenski (UKAEA, EFDA-JET) with contributions from M.Wischmeier (IPP), A.Kukushkin (ITER), S.Krashenninikov (UCSD), B.Lipschultz (MIT), S.Wiesen (FZJ)

  2. Scope of the present session Growing consensus in the DSOL ITPA community, that • It is the right time to revisit the issue of divertor plasma detachment, which has gradually fallen off the radar, since its glory days of 1990’s • Aside from basic physics curiosity, the motivation for this re-examination comes from the need to make quantitative predictions of power and particle fluxes to divertor tiles in ITER • Since these predictions are ultimately made with 2-D multi-fluid plasma / MC neutral codes, such as SOLPS (B2/EIRENE), validation and verification of these codes (ideally against a multi-machine database) is highly desirable, as is the resolution of any discrepancies between code and experiment • One cannot do justice in a single DSOL ITPA session to the full complexity of this problem, especially all its ramifications for ITER. • It is thus preferable to use this session to re-open (re-postulate) the problem, perhaps reviewing new experimental data and/or progress made in code development in recent years, and thus provide a basis for a follow-up session(s) at future meetings. In light of the above, the present session will focus on the basic physics understanding of divertor detachment, rather than its implications for ITER

  3. Basic mechanisms understood… • Detachment is defined variously as • the loss of SOL plasma pressure along B from upstream to target, p_u / p_t, • the reduction of the plasma flux to the target wrt the two-point model (high-recycling regime) scaling, Gamma_t ~ n_u^2 / (1-f_rad). Expressed as DOD. • the movement of radiation, ionisation (and recombination) fronts away from the target • Requires removal of both plasma momentum and energy • Momentum removed by CX and elastic collisions with neutrals in the divertor volume • Hence, divertor closure facilitates detachment, e.g. vertical vs horizontal targets • Energy removed by above, plus hydrogenic and impurity line radiation • Hence, impurity seeding facilitates detachment • Particles additionally removed by volumetric recombination for very high densities • In-out asymmetry in lines with that of power into the divertor volume • For normal field direction (grad B down), more power to outer target • For comparable length of inner and outer target legs, the inner target becomes colder & denser, and hence detaches at lower upstream density • This is not true when the inner leg is much shorter than the outer leg, e.g. TCV • For reversed field direction (grad B up), comparable power to both targets • Hence, roughly symmetric target conditions and detachment behaviour • Asymmetry consistent with GC drifts and diamagnetic flows

  4. Upstream profiles broaden with density

  5. Basic mechanisms understood… • Upstream collisionality is the governing parameter • For relatively open divertors, detachment occurs for n* ~ 50-100 • Divertor neutral pressure increases during the onset of detachment • Later saturates and/or decreases as the ionisation front moves away from target • Detachment of the outer target concurrent with formation of an X-point MARFE • One of the mechanisms proposed for the density limit (K.Borrass) • Preceded by a Type I-III back transition when in H-mode (G. McCracken) • Under Type-I H-mode conditions, detachment only during the inter-ELM phase • Type-I ELMs ‘burn through’ the neutral gas buffer and transiently reattach the plasma • Limited amount of ‘energy buffering’ possible on the time scale of the ELM • Steady detachment possible only for smallest, typically Type-III, ELMs

  6. Pressure profiles in L & H modes

  7. …but details are proving elusive • Most of the above tendencies can be reproduced by 2D multi-fluid/MC codes • However, the codes are not able to reproduce all the measurements simultaneously, even under relatively simple Ohmic and L-mode conditions • Possible reasons for discrepancies, i.e. the physics missing from these codes • SOL plasma turbulence involves strong thermodynamic perturbations, e.g. dn/n ~ 1 • Hence, the mean field formulation on which the 2D codes are based may be inaccurate, e.g. <nv> = <n><v> + <dn dv>, with the second terms no longer small • Similarly, the turbulent closure schemes which are used, typically the Prandl mixing length scheme with D_perp ~ const, may also generate large errors • Finally, the problem becomes 3D rather than 2D, as axisymmetry broken by turbulent plasma filaments • Kinetic effects (non-local heat transport) become important in detachment fronts • Spitzer-Harm (Braginskii) closure for heat flux and viscosity become invalid • Heat flux limit (flux limiting factor) corrections are likewise inadequate, since heat flux can actually exceed the S-H value when hot electrons stream into a cold region • Neutral effects (n-n collisions, neutral flows and turbulence) • Under dense divertor conditions, neutrals become fluid-like and most likely turbulent • Photon effects (e.g. L_alpha opacity) and radiation transport • Under dense divertor conditions, the plasma/neutrals becomes opaque in certain lines • Impurity effects (erosion, transport, i-Z interaction) involve many approximations

  8. Detachment issues for ITER In ITER, detached divertor operation must be compatible with a sufficiently strong edge transport barrier to achieve Q=10. This raises the key question, what is the impact of divertor detachment on the H-mode pedestal & ELMs ?! and a series of related issues: • The role of extrinsic impurity seeding in facilitating plasma detachment, and the contribution of seeded impurity radiation required in ITER with W divertor tiles,i.e. in the absence of Carbon as the main radiating species? • The impact of seeded impurities on W erosion, i.e. the trade-offs between the beneficial effect of reducing Te_div and harmful effect of providing higher Z ions? • The impact of detachment on X-point radiation and hence on the plasma pedestal temperature, and ELM characteristics (including I-III), in present tokamaks & ITER • The transient effect of ELMs on the detached divertor plasma, specifically the impurity transport processes in the post-ELM phase • Finally, the effect of the so-called “active ELM mitigation” techniques, such as pellet injection and magnetic field perturbations (RMP, EFCC, TF Ripple) on plasma detachment during the inter-ELM phase

More Related