Loading in 5 sec....

Formal Test for ValidityPowerPoint Presentation

Formal Test for Validity

- 54 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Formal Test for Validity

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Formal Test for Validity

An evaluation is an assignment of truth-values to sentence letters. For example:

- A = T
- B = T
- C = F
- D = T
- E = F
- ...

To evaluate a WFF is to determine whether it is true or false according to an evaluation.

Let’s consider ((Q & ~P) → R)

Here’s our evaluation: Q = T, P = T, R = F.

Write down sentence letters.

Insert truth-values from evaluation.

Copy down the formula to evaluate.

Copy the truth-values of each variable.

Copy the truth-values of each variable.

Copy the truth-values of each variable.

Find a connective to evaluate.

Need these truth values.

Need these truth values.

Need this truth value.

Need this truth value.

Need these truth values.

Need these truth values.

Need these truth values.

Need these truth values.

Evaluation: P = F, Q = F, R = T

- ~(~P & ~Q)
- ~(P → ~Q)
- ((P & ~Q) & R)

So “~(~P & ~Q)” has the same truth-table as “(P v Q).” Why is that?

Suppose I say: “you didn’t do your homework and you didn’t come to class on time.” When is this statement false? When either you did your homework or you came to class on time.

Write a full truth-table for:

~(P → ~Q)

So “~(P → ~Q)” has the same truth-table as “(P & Q).” Why is that?

Suppose I say: “If you eat this spicy food, you will cry.” You might respond by saying “No, that’s not true: I will eat the spicy food and I will not cry.”

Write a full truth-table for:

(P & (~Q & R))

We know that an argument is deductively valid when we know that if it is true, then its conclusion must be true.

We can use truth-tables to show that certain arguments are valid.

Suppose we want to show that the following argument is valid:

(P → Q)

~Q

Therefore, ~P

We begin by writing down all the possible truth-values for the sentence letters in the argument.