1 / 18

CSR, Human Rights and TNCs: Project Finance

CSR, Human Rights and TNCs: Project Finance. Tom Sorell Centre for the Study of Global Ethics University of Birmingham. Outline. Human Rights and Multinationals CSR –old and new HR and non-state actors HR and business NGOs, HR business groupings UN Norms Ruggie process. Outline 2.

senwe
Download Presentation

CSR, Human Rights and TNCs: Project Finance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CSR, Human Rights and TNCs:Project Finance Tom Sorell Centre for the Study of Global Ethics University of Birmingham

  2. Outline • Human Rights and Multinationals • CSR –old and new • HR and non-state actors • HR and business NGOs, HR business groupings • UN Norms • Ruggie process

  3. Outline 2 • Project Finance • Characteristics of Project Financings • HR Issues surrounding project financings • Project finance in the context of the Norms and Global Compact

  4. Main claims • There shouldn’t be just one approach to the human rights risks posed by TNC activity • Attempts to regulate TNCs using international human rights law may be (1) impractical and (2) suffer from homogenizing TNCs • Human rights risks of TNC activity probably highest in developing countries

  5. Main claims 2 • Project finance in developing countries has characteristics that make it suitable for H-R regulation of TNCs • Other H-R sensitive TNC activity may need a different approach

  6. From old CSR to Human Rights • CSR –old and new • Old-primarily American • Primarily concerned with local non-business responsibilities of local branches of US big-business in US • Double standards problem • HRs with non-state actors

  7. The Global Compact (1999- ) • http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/index.html • Voluntary organization • Has thousands of members • Two overarching principles: Principle 1: Businesses should support and respect the protection of internationally proclaimed human rights; and Principle 2: make sure that they are not complicit in human rights abuses

  8. Global Compact (Principle 2) • “Complicity” http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/TheTenPrinciples/Principle2.html

  9. UN Norms • Adopted 2003 by the UN Subcommission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights • An attempt to bring TNCs into the UN Treaty system • Gives TNCs responsibilities for respecting and sometimes promoting h-rs in their “sphere of activity”

  10. UN Norms 2 • Contemplate monitoring and legal enforcement mechanisms like those of UN treaty bodies • Outline responsibilities that some avant-garde Western TNCs have already voluntarily accepted • Heavily criticized by business. Were sent for further study by Harvard political scientist, John Ruggie

  11. Ruggie process • Scepticism about “sphere of activity” in which Norms say companies have H-R responsibilities • Criticism of attempt to introduce legally enforceable norms • http://www.business-humanrights.org/Documents/Ruggie-HRC-2006

  12. Project finance 1 • TNCs, as shareholders (sponsors), set up a project company to build and/or operate an infrastructure project • Project company financed by loans from banks secured against revenues from infrastructure process • Project company loans not secured against sponsor assets

  13. Project finance for developing countries • Agent in a developing country vs. agent of development • First mover in development • Contract-ridden nature of PF • Govt and project companies as parties to contracts

  14. Stabilization clauses • No added costs from legal changes • BTC case

  15. Project finance and “sphere of activity” • Contractual nature of project finance heavily defines sphere of activity of project companies, and, indirectly TNC-sponsors; so Project Finance meets some of Ruggie’s worries about “sphere of activity”

  16. Project finance and “complicity” • Agent of development vs presence in a developing country • Presence in a developing, h-r violating country vs contributing to its development effort • Intermediate complicity of PF companies • Vs gross complicity of Yahoo etc

  17. PF activity vs TNC activity in general • Not all TNCs involved in developing countries • Not all TNC involvement in developing countries as agents of development • Not all TNC involvement in h-r violating developing countries “complicit”

  18. Problematic cases for attention • TNCs owned by h-r violating states • Development funding by h-r violating states • Entirely different, public-private partnerships in developing countries

More Related