Loading in 5 sec....

ISE480 Sequencing and SchedulingPowerPoint Presentation

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

- 100 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Izmir University of Economics

ISE480 2011 -2012 Fall Semestre

Branch and Bound

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

2012 – 2013 Fall semestre

- Enumerative method
- Guarantees finding the best schedule
- Basic idea:
- Look at a set of schedules
- Develop a bound on the performance
- Discard (fathom) if bound worse than best schedule found before (incumbent)

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

- So we’ve got a IP formulation of the problem, how do we solve it?
- Using standard IP solution techniques such as branch-and-bound

- Doesn’t mean the problem is easy
- Will now talk about branch-and-bound (B&B) which can be used to solve IPs and other hard problems

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

- Idea
- Systematically search through possible variable values
- Use heuristics to pick a decision to try (“branch”)
- Use lower bounds on solutions to “bound” the search (fathom)

- Creates a search tree

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

Branch

a = 0

a = 1

b = 0

b = 1

b = 0

b = 1

c = 0

c = 1

c = 0

c = 1

c = 0

c = 1

c = 0

c = 1

- Imagine a problem with 3 variables
- a, b, c є{0, 1}

100

90

110

115

80

90

100

110

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

a = 0

a = 1

b = 0

b = 1

b = 0

c = 0

c = 1

c = 0

Bound

- Imagine I have a way to calculate a lower bound on the cost at each node

50

70

80

85

95

80

100

90

80

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

- Branch: assign a heuristic value to a variable
- Creates two subproblems

- Bound: compare lower bound at node with best known solution
- If LB > best, you can backtrack right away

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

- Usually lower bound is found by solving the linear relaxation of the IP
- LP formed by ignoring integral constraints

- Branch on one of the integer variables with a non-integer value to be:
- greater than or equal to the next highest integer, or
- Less than or equal to the next lowest integer

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

- The EDD rule is optimal for
- If jobs have different release dates, which we denote
then the problem is NP-Hard

- What makes it so much more difficult?

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

1

2

3

0 5 10 15

Can we

improve?

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

EDD

Add a delay

1

3

2

0 5 10 15

What makes this problem hard is thatthe optimal schedule is not necessarilya non-delay schedule

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

- The preemptive EDD rule is optimal for the preemptive (prmp) version of the problem
- Note that in the previous example, the preemptive EDD rule gives us the optimal schedule
- Note that if rj = 0, then the above does not hold.

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

- The problem
cannot be solved using a simple dispatching rule so we will try to solve it using branch and bound

- To develop a branch and bound procedure:
- Determine how to branch
- Determine how to bound

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

- Enumeration in asearchtree
- each node is a partial solution, i.e. a part of the solution space

Level 0

root node

Level 1 (n nodes)

child nodes

...

Level 2 (n*(n-1))

child nodes

...

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

(•,•,•,•)

(1,•,•,•)

(2,•,•,•)

(3,•,•,•)

(4,•,•,•)

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

Branching

(•,•,•,•)

(1,•,•,•)

(2,•,•,•)

(3,•,•,•)

(4,•,•,•)

Discard immediately because

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

Branching

(•,•,•,•)

(1,•,•,•)

(2,•,•,•)

(3,•,•,•)

(4,•,•,•)

Need to develop lower bounds on

these nodes and do further branching.

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

- Typical way to develop bounds is to relax the original problem to an easily solvable problem
- Three cases:
- If there is no solution to the relaxed problem there is no solution to the original problem
- If the optimal solution to the relaxed problem is feasible for the original problem then it is also optimal for the original problem
- If the optimal solution to the relaxed problem is not feasible for the original problem it provides a bound on its performance

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

- The problem
is a relaxation to the problem

- Not allowing preemption is a constraint in the original problem but not the relaxed problem
- We know how to solve the relaxed problem (preemptive EDD rule)

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

- Preemptive EDD rule optimal for the preemptive version of the problem
- Thus, solution obtained is a lower bound on the maximum delay
- If preemptive EDD results in a non-preemptive schedule all nodes with higher lower bounds can be discarded.

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

- Start with (1,•,•,•):
- Job with EDD is Job 4 but
- Second earliest due date is for Job 3

Job 1

Job 2

Job 3

Job 4

0 10 20

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling

Branching

(•,•,•,•)

(1,•,•,•)

(2,•,•,•)

(3,•,•,•)

(4,•,•,•)

(1,2,•,•)

(1,3,•,•)

(1,3,4,2)

ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling