1 / 7

Redetermination of Ditch Benefits in the Minnesota River Basin

Status Update 2010. Redetermination of Ditch Benefits in the Minnesota River Basin. Statistics. 19 counties have done ROBs in last 5 years, 15 counties have not .

selma
Download Presentation

Redetermination of Ditch Benefits in the Minnesota River Basin

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status Update 2010 Redetermination of Ditch Benefits in the Minnesota River Basin

  2. Statistics • 19 counties have done ROBs in last 5 years, 15 counties have not. • 5 counties have ordered all systems to be redetermined. Most counties only do redeterminations when petitioned for by landowners or ordered by drainage authority in conjunction with a major repair of the system. • Of the ROBs that have been done, officials indicated that 75% were completed with positive support from the public and 25% involved negative actions.

  3. Statistics • Most ditches that “require” buffers have already been buffered. (appeared to be a lot of differences in perceptions about what systems were required to have buffers) • Most counties active in redeterminations are located in the southern portion of the basin where drainage greatly increases land value – northern and western portions of the basin largely did not view ROB as needed or beneficial.

  4. Redetermination of Benefits Status Minnesota River Basin

  5. Hindrances to ROB • Cost • Time • Process viewed as unnecessary • Political issues • Counterproductive landowners

  6. Problems Encountered • Outdated ditch laws • Errors • Initiating the process • Buffers

  7. Insight • Apparent need for additional clarification and consistency among all involved. • Order redeterminations rather than have them petitioned. • Increase/Improve communications between ditch authorities and landowners. • Allow landowners to meet with viewers prior to final meeting. • Remind option of buffer programs – make sure programs can be utilized prior to ROB.

More Related