html5-img
1 / 12

CZECH PRESIDENCY HIGH LEVEL CONFERENCE ON THE FUTURE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT QUALITY POLICY

CZECH PRESIDENCY HIGH LEVEL CONFERENCE ON THE FUTURE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT QUALITY POLICY Prague, 13 March 2009. DRAFT CONCLUSIONS OF WORKSHOP B: EU QUALITY SCHEMES. Subtopic 1: Traditional Specialties Guaranteed (TSGs). TSGs play an important role towards:

season
Download Presentation

CZECH PRESIDENCY HIGH LEVEL CONFERENCE ON THE FUTURE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT QUALITY POLICY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CZECH PRESIDENCY HIGH LEVEL CONFERENCE ON THE FUTURE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT QUALITY POLICY Prague, 13 March 2009 DRAFT CONCLUSIONS OF WORKSHOP B: EU QUALITY SCHEMES

  2. Subtopic 1: Traditional Specialties Guaranteed (TSGs) • TSGs play an important role towards: • Improving quality and production systems at the producers’ level • Ensuring a certain quality to consumers and providing them with authentic products (a marketing tool) • Contributing to the economic development of agricultural areas in the EU • TSGs are different from GIs: not an intellectual property right system but a quality scheme

  3. Subtopic 1: Traditional Specialties Guaranteed (TSGs) • Strong interest for TSGs from new Member States due to historical factors – forced immigration and standardization after the second world war Interesting testimonies from Slovenia and Poland • Positive impact of engaging in a TSG approach demonstrated by the Jamon Serrano case • Large support from other stakeholders from the old Member States => Strong plea to give time to the TSG scheme to prove its usefulness

  4. Subtopic 1: Traditional Specialties Guaranteed (TSGs) Identified shortcomings of the TSG system: • Cost of certification for a limited volume of production • Lack of governing body (organisation of producers) • Limited control and protection of TSGs • Very limited knowledge of the concept by consumers

  5. Subtopic 1: Traditional Specialties Guaranteed (TSGs) • Despite limited number of registered TSGs, stakeholders called on the European Commission not to delete this quality scheme • Need to look into making the scheme more appealing to both producers and consumers, improving it in particular through: • Mandatory reservation of the name • Simplification of the control procedure • Better communication of the concept towards consumers (mandatory use of the logo, promotion campaigns)

  6. Subtopic 2: Geographical Indications (PDOs, PGIs) • PDOs and PGIs: very important instruments of the agricultural product quality policy for producers, consumers, Member States and the regions • GIs are complementary to trademarks and not an alternative (no support for replacing the GI schemes by trademarks) • Call on the Commission to clarify the relationship between GIs and trademarks, in particular with regard to: • The scope of protection granted • The need for national trademark offices and the Office for the Harmonization of the Internal Market (OHIM) to refuse the registration of trademarks including registered GI names by non-authorized entities

  7. Subtopic 2: Geographical Indications (PDOs, PGIs) • Participants expressed their opposition to: • Introducing new criteria for GIs • Merging the PDO and PGI into one scheme • Limiting the number of GI products to be protected at the European and/or International levels • The enlargement of the scope of products covered by the PDO and PGI schemes should be explored and the issue of genericity further discussed • Large consensus for a centralized EU approach in the management of the GI system to ensure consistency and credibility of the system, but important to simplify the registration procedure to speed up the process

  8. Subtopic 2: Geographical Indications (PDOs, PGIs) • Participants called for the role and rights of applicant groups to be improved and clearly recognized. Perceived as crucial to maintain competitiveness of the GI system for food and wine products • Call on the Commission to make proposals to allow associations of producers to: • Manage the production: considered as essential to provide guarantees on the quality and reputation of GIs • Control the “conditionnement” (packaging) phase • Control the use of a GI name in a sales denomination • Benefit from more EU funds for promotional activities

  9. Subtopic 2: Geographical Indications (PDOs, PGIs) • Converging views in favour of the enhancement of the protection of GIs: • In the EU: call for a modification of the EU legislation and the adoption of guidelines so that Member States implement fully the ex officio procedure • Outside the EU, call on the Commission to increase its effortstowards defending and promoting the sui generis GI system approach at the International level, in particular through: • The WTO Doha Development Agenda • Bilateral and regional agreements, including ACTA • More technical assistance to third countries

More Related