Sponsored Links
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
1 / 192

จริยธรรม คุณธรรม ในการปฏิบัติงาน PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 122 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

จริยธรรม คุณธรรม ในการปฏิบัติงาน. ดร.สุทิน ลี้ปิยะชาติ ผู้เชี่ยวชาญด้านเศรษฐกิจพอเพียงและธนาคารสมอง สำนักงานคณะกรรมการพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ รองเลขาธิการมูลนิธิประเทศไทยใสสะอาด. คุณธรรม. หมายถึง สภาพคุณงามความดี. จริยธรรม. หมายถึง ธรรมที่เป็นข้อประพฤติ

Download Presentation

จริยธรรม คุณธรรม ในการปฏิบัติงาน

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


.




The King of the Kings

The King of the World



.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.


.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.


. .


...



...

...


...

...


...


...





///

//

( )

( )










.

.

.

.


/

-

-

-

-



/

-

-

-


- /

-


Capittal

Capittal

Labor

Labor




-

-

-

-




- (Normal Profit)

-


-

-

-


-

-


-

-

-

-

-


-

-

-

-


-

-


-

-

-


-

-

-

-

-

-


UNDP


UNDP




  • () ()/



()






WHERE ARE WE GOING



1)

2)

3)

4)

5)

6)

7)

8)

9)

10)


...

( ) .. /



CPI 2004 Score

Hong Kong-based Political & Economic Risk Consultancy Ltd. Index 2004

Rank

Country

1

Indonesia

9.25

2

India

8.9

Vietnam

8.67

3

4

Philippines

8.33

5

China

7.33

5

Malaysia

7.33

0 = Highly clean

10 = Highly corrupt

5

THAILAND

7.33

8

South Korea

6.67

9

Taiwan

6.1

10

Hong Kong

3.6

11

Japan

3.5

12

Singapore

0.5


CPI 2005 Score

Hong Kong-based Political & Economic Risk Consultancy Ltd. Index 2005

Rank

Country

1

Indonesia

9.10

2

Philippines

8.80

3

Vietnam

8.65

India

8.63

4

5

China

7.68

6

Thailand

7.20

0 = Highly clean

10 = Highly corrupt

7

Malaysia

6.80

8

South Korea

6.50

9

Taiwan

6.15

10

Hong Kong

3.50

11

Japan

3.46

12

Singapore

0.65


Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2004

CPI 2004 Score

CPI 2004 Score

Rank

Country

Rank

Country

1

Finland

9.7

39

Malaysia

5.0

2

New Zealand

9.6

47

South Korea

4.5

3

Denmark

9.5

64

THAILAND

3.6

5

Singapore

9.3

64

Mexico

3.6

6

Sweden

9.2

71

China

3.4

7

Switzerland

9.1

90

India

2.8

11

UK

8.6

102

Vietnam

2.6

16

Hong Kong

8.0

133

Indonesia

2.0

17

USA

7.5

145

Bangladesh

1.5

24

Japan

6.9

10 = Highly clean

0 = Highly corrupt

Transparency

International

35

Taiwan

5.6


Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2005

CPI 2005 Score

CPI 2005 Score

Rank

Country

Rank

Country

1

Iceland

9.7

39

Malaysia

5.1

2

Finland

9.6

40

South Korea

5.0

2

New Zealand

9.6

59

THAILAND

3.8

4

Denmark

9.5

65

Mexico

3.5

5

Singapore

9.4

78

China

3.2

11

Netherlands

8.6

88

India

2.9

11

UK

8.6

107

Vietnam

2.6

15

Hong Kong

8.3

137

Indonesia

2.2

17

USA

7.6

158

Bangladesh

1.7

21

Japan

6.3

10 = Highly clean

0 = Highly corrupt

Transparency

International

32

Taiwan

5.9


The Corruption Perception Index (CPI) by TI

Thailands Rank

Coverage

(countries)

Year

Rank

CPI

1996

3.3

39

52

1997

3.0

37

54

1998

3.0

61

85

1999

3.2

68

99

2000

3.2

68

98

10 Points

= Most Transparent

0 Point

= Most Corruption

2001

3.2

61

91

2002

3.2

64

102

2003

3.3

70

133

2004

3.6

64

145

2005

3.8

59

158


(R&D)

(Training)

(Network)

(PR)



..









...

( ) .. /



( )

.

.

.


. one stop service

.

.

.




  • /



(Core Competencies)

.

.

.

.

.


.


  • (Competency)

  • (Performance)

  • (Merit)


Knowledge Workers

R & D


(Strategic Human Resource Management)

/

(Direction/

Strategy)

(Capabilities)

(Motivation)

HR Direction / Strategy: /

HR Motivation: /

HR Capabilities: /



  • ///


  • - -




:

  • (QUICK WIN INITIATIVE)

    1.1

    1.2

    1.3

    1.4

    1.5

    1.6

    1.7

    1.8

    6-7


2.

2.1 ()

2.2 ( )

2.3 ( )

2.4 ( )


2.5 ( 360 (coaching) )

2.6 ( )

2.7 ( :

-

-

-

-

-




1993

  • 1993: U.S.-The Government Performance and Results Act (1993)

  • 1994: U.S.-Government Management and Reform Act (1994)

  • 1999: Canada-Results for Canadians

  • 2001: U.S.-The Presidents Management Agenda

  • 2001: Japan-Government Policy Evaluation Act

  • 2002: U.S. Sarbane-Oxley Act (Good Governance)

  • 2002: France-La Loi Organique Relative Aux Lois de France

  • 2002: U.S.-Program Assessment and Rating Tool

  • 2003: Thailand-Principle and Practice of Good Governance

  • 2003: Singapore Net Economic Value

  • 2004: U.K. Public Service Agreement


Tony Blair Harvard Steve Kelman


(Output) (Outcome)

(Output)

(Outcome)


(Implementation)

  • -


(Implementation)

  • ()

  • ( )


(Public Service)

(Output) (Outcome)





/



/

..

..


/

..

--------------------------


.

.

.

.

.

.

.


.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.


/

..


( )

  • .

  • ..


. /

.

. /

. /

.

.

.


.

.

.

.

.


I AM READY

Integrity

Activeness

Morality

Relevancy

Efficiency

Accountability

Democracy

Yield


Public Service Core Values (OECD)

  • Impartiality -

  • Legality -

  • Integrity-

  • Transparency -

  • Efficiency -

  • Equality -

if reform is to help the

Federal Government

adapt to a rapidly

changing world, its

primary objectives

must be to a

government that is ;

- Citizen Centered

- Resulted Oriented

- Market Based.

  • Responsibility -

  • Justice -

George W. Bush

July 11, 2001


  • (Selflessness)

Seven

Principles

of

Public

Life

  • (Objectivity)

  • (Integrity)

  • (Accountability)

  • (Openness)

  • (Honesty)

Lord Nolans Report

1995

  • (Leadership)


-

Steven Covey U.S.A.


.. /

-

-

-


..

/


  • (///)

/

  • (Conflict of Interest)

  • (Integrity)

  • (Accountability)

  • (Openness/Transparency)


.

(Understanding)

. (Internalize)

.

(Commitment as way of life)


:

.

.

.


  • (Role Model)



..


( )

.

.

.


Office of the Civil Service Commission

The Civil Service Training Institute

  • ... ..

    • ...

2006, Ethics Promotion and Information Center


.. ( )

.. ( .. )


.. ( )

.. ( .. )


Office of the Civil Service Commission

The Civil Service Training Institute

:

:

:

2006, Ethics Promotion and Information Center


..

/


Office of the Civil Service Commission

The Civil Service Training Institute

.

.

.

2006, Ethics Promotion and Information Center


Office of the Civil Service Commission

The Civil Service Training Institute

:

:

:

2006, Ethics Promotion and Information Center


Office of the Civil Service Commission

The Civil Service Training Institute

.

. ..

2006, Ethics Promotion and Information Center


Office of the Civil Service Commission

The Civil Service Training Institute

2006, Ethics Promotion and Information Center


Office of the Civil Service Commission

The Civil Service Training Institute

  • /

2006 Ethics Promotion and Information Center


Office of the Civil Service Commission

The Civil Service Training Institute

  • () /

2006 Ethics Promotion and Information Center


Office of the Civil Service Commission

The Civil Service Training Institute

  • /

2006 Ethics Promotion and Information Center


Office of the Civil Service Commission

The Civil Service Training Institute

()

  • // ///

  • //

2006 Ethics Promotion and Information Center


Office of the Civil Service Commission

The Civil Service Training Institute

  • /

2006 Ethics Promotion and Information Center


Office of the Civil Service Commission

The Civil Service Training Institute

  • ...

2006 Ethics Promotion and Information Center


Office of the Civil Service Commission

The Civil Service Training Institute

  • / ( )

  • /

2006 Ethics Promotion and Information Center



.. ...

. :

.

. ,

. ,

.


*

*


= x

(+

+

)



*

*


  • *

  • -


    • ...............................

      -


    *

    *

    *

    *


    *

    *

    *


    *

    *

    *

    *

    * ...

    *

    *


    =


    (Conflict of Interest)

    CONFLICT OF

    INTEREST


    ()

    //

    • (Accepting Benefits)

    • (Self-Dealing)

    • (Contracts)

    • (Post-Employment)


    ()

    • (Outside

    • Employment or Moonlighting)

    • (Inside Information)

    • (Using Employers

    • Property for Private Usage)

    • (Pork-barrelling)

    .

    ,



    (1)

    -

    -

    -

    -


    (2)

    -

    -

    -

    -


    (3)

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -


    (4)

    -

    -

    -


    (1)

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -


    (2)

    -

    -

    -

    -


    101

    102

    103

    104

    105

    106


    201

    202

    203

    204


    301

    302

    303

    304

    305

    306

    307


    401

    501

    601

    701


    1.

    -

    - (Operational Plan)


    2.

    - (Standards of Performance)

    -

    3.

    -


    4.

    -

    5.

    -

    6.

    -

    -


    7.

    -

    -

    8.

    -

    -

    9.

    -

    -


    10.

    -

    11.

    -

    -


    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *


    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *


    *

    *

    *

    *

    * ...

    *

    *


    • *

    • *

    • *

    • *


    .

    .

    .

    .

    .


    .

    .

    .

    .

    .





    .

    .

    .



  • Login