Quality matters
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 12

Quality Matters PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 87 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Quality Matters. Jennifer Strickland, PhD , [email protected] What is it anyway?. Quality Matters (QM) is a faculty-centered, peer review process designed to certify the quality of online and hybrid courses and online components

Download Presentation

Quality Matters

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Quality matters

Quality Matters

Jennifer Strickland, PhD, [email protected]


What is it anyway

What is it anyway?

  • Quality Matters (QM) is a faculty-centered, peer review process designed to certify the quality of online and hybrid courses and online components

  • A faculty-driven, collaborative peer review process

  • Committed to continuous quality improvement

  • Based in national standards of best practice, the research literature and instructional design principles

  • Designed to promote student learning and success


Quality matters

Course Meets Quality Expectations

Course Revision

Faculty Course Developers

Quality Matters Course Peer Review Process

Institutions

National Standards & Research Literature

Course

Rubric

Faculty Reviewers

Training

Peer Course Review

Feedback

Instructional Designers


Qm certified peer reviewers

QM Certified Peer Reviewers

  • QM-Certified Peer Reviewers

    • How to interpret the standards (with examples and annotations)

    • How to evaluate a course (hands-on with sample course)

  • Reviews are conducted by teams of three peer reviewers

    • Master Reviewer/Chair

    • Peer reviewer (external)

    • Peer reviewer (SME)


Quality assurance

  • 700+ faculty trained to review online courses using the rubric

  • individuals from 158 different institutions in 28 states

  • More than 2,500 faculty and instructional design staff participated in Quality Matters workshops

Quality Assurance


The rubric is the core of quality matters

The Rubric is the Core of Quality Matters

  • 40 specific elements across 8 broad areas (general standards) of course quality

  • Detailed annotations and examples of good practice for all 40 standards

  • http://www.qualitymatters.org/FIPSE.htm


Course alignment

Course Alignment

  • 5 of the 8 general standards should align:

    • Course Overview and Introduction

    • Learning Objectives

    • Assessment and Measurement

    • Resources and Materials

    • Learner Interaction

    • Course Technology

    • Learner Support

    • ADA Compliance

Key components must align


Standards

Standards

  • 1.1 Instructions make clear how to get started and where to find various course components.

  • 2.1The course learning objectives describe outcomes that are measurable.

  • 3.1 The types of assessments selected measure the stated learning objectives and are consistent with course activities and resources.


Common areas for improvement 2006 2007 based on 95 reviews

Common Areas for Improvement (2006-2007, based on 95 reviews)

  • Learning objectives at module/unit level (II.2): 45%

  • Self-check/practice with quick feedback (III.5): 42%

  • Instructions to students on meeting learning objectives (II.4): 40%

  • Alternatives to auditory/visual content (VIII.2): 39%

  • Clear standards for instructor availability(V.3): 37%


Maricopa quality matters

Maricopa Quality Matters

  • Maricopa/MCLI is the statewide consortium lead

  • Ten QM Maricopa Colleges

  • Other online Course Evaluation Resources

  • 67 faculty members, instructional designers and technologists are certified peer reviewers

  • College-Based Steering Team


Impact on faculty support

Impact on Faculty Support

  • Nationally, 89% of respondents would recommend the QM review process to others

  • Sample comments

    • I was too close to see what could be improved.

    • Provides a great way to get an objective view of your course.

    • It made all of my online courses better.

    • It provides a view from a more student-oriented perspective.

    • It provides a look into potential student problems areas for course completion.

    • Many elements that might contribute to a student withdrawing can be eliminated.


Qm is about course design

QM is about peer review

QM is about course design

Not evaluation

Not teaching;

QM is about improving Student Success online

Through effective and consistent course design


  • Login