1 / 87

A Credo

The Measurement and Macroeconomics of Income Inequality and work in progress on political outcomes. The University of Utah Department of Political Science February 15, 2019 James K. Galbraith The University of Texas at Austin. A Credo.

schmittj
Download Presentation

A Credo

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Measurement and Macroeconomics of Income Inequality and work in progress on political outcomes.The University of UtahDepartment of Political ScienceFebruary 15, 2019James K. GalbraithThe University of Texas at Austin

  2. A Credo “Kepler undertook to draw a curve through the places of Mars, and his greatest service to science was in impressing on men's minds that this was the thing to be done if they wished to improve astronomy; that they were not to content themselves with inquiring whether one system of epicycles was better than another, but that they were to sit down to the figures and find out what the curve, in truth was.” -- Charles Sanders Peirce (1877)

  3. To Begin with a Comparison At the time we began our work in the area of inequality measurement, the principal data source was the Deininger and Squire compilation of past inequality measures, done at the World Bank and published around 1996. Here is a sampling of that data set, in its complete and “high quality” versions.

  4. Samples from the World Bank High Quality Data Set

  5. Our method uses administrative data, usually payrolls and employment by industry or sector, and relies on the Theil Statistic, or more specifically its “Between-Groups Component.” Data are widely available, cost is minimal and information is usually published on a timely basis. There are national, regional and global data sets that can be drawn on.

  6. A brief review of the Theil Statistic: The “Between-Groups Component” n ~ employment; mu ~ average income; j ~ subscript denoting group

  7. Decomposing Inequality in ChinaNote the downward trend after 2008 Kuznets Schumpeter Data from the State Statistical Yearbook Calculations by UTIP

  8. 1987

  9. 1997

  10. Contribution of Each County to Income Inequality, Late 2000s Contribution to inequality is presented as shading and as height above or below the zero plane.

  11. Decomposing Europe by Regionor, Compared to Everything Else, London and Paris are Really Rich l Paris London

  12. New Evidence from Data on Industrial Pay:The UTIP-UNIDO Data Set1963-2011Calculated as the Between-Groups Componentof Theil's T StatisticAcross Industrial Categoriesfrom UNIDOIndustrial Statistics

  13. Estimated Household IncomeInequalityLevels and Changes in the World 1963-2014With 4550 observations for 154 countries, we believe EHII is the largest single-concept income inequality data set not using any interpolation across years or countries. The remaining slides however use the previous version, through 2008.

  14. A Brief Summary The EHII data set is a panel of estimated Gini coefficients for gross household income, derived from measures of cross-sector industrial pay inequality and other information, especially the share of manufacturing in total output. It is calibrated to standard Gini coefficients by a simple regression analysis.

  15. Extending EHII EHII is calculated by regressing the original Deininger Squire “High Qualitÿ” data set against UTIP-UNIDO, with controls for the share of manufacturing in total employment and dummies for the various income/expenditure concepts present in the original DS data set. The coefficient estimates are then used to generate the EHII values. Here is the new regression underlying EHII 2013.

  16. Maps by Aleksandra Malinowska Research supported by INET

  17. Global Mean ValuesEHII Gini Coefficients ` Inequality within countries surged from 1981 to 2000. Adding new transition countries lowers the mean here.

  18. Global Turning Points MatchMonetary UpheavalsGlobal Mean Values of EHII Gini Coefficients ` NASDAQ & 9/11 End of Bretton Woods Debt Crisis

  19. But... Are these estimates any good? Charts to Follow by Beatrice Halbach

  20. Wealthy Countries(The model works)

  21. “Transition Economies”(Again, the model works)

  22. “Developing Countries”(Sometimes the model works)

More Related