1 / 28

Eliminating Waiting Lists

Eliminating Waiting Lists. Short-Term Prevention Groups for College Students. Program Authors – Campus Mental Health Services. Shane Owens, Ph.D., ABPP, Assistant Director Andrew Berger, Ph.D., ABPP, Director Jill Bandura, Ph.D., Staff Psychologist

sbobby
Download Presentation

Eliminating Waiting Lists

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Eliminating Waiting Lists Short-Term Prevention Groups for College Students

  2. Program Authors – Campus Mental Health Services • Shane Owens, Ph.D., ABPP, Assistant Director • Andrew Berger, Ph.D., ABPP, Director • Jill Bandura, Ph.D., Staff Psychologist • Christopher Browne, Ph.D., Staff Psychologist • 2012-2013 Psychology Externs: • Meredith McWillams, MS • Kristin Lopez, MS • Jameela Youssef, MS

  3. Introduction

  4. Campus Mental Health Services • Four Full Time Staff • Three Licensed • One License-Eligible • Two Board Certified in Cognitive Behavioral Psychology by ABPP • Three Part-Time Psychology Externs • Master’s Level • In pursuit of Doctoral Degree

  5. Campus Mental Health Services • All staff are on call 24 hours per day, 365 days per year • Services • Individual, couples, and group psychotherapy • Consultation and liaison services • Education and outreach • Works on an outpatient treatment facility model • Multisymptomatic outpatient population

  6. Statement of the Problem • 29% of college counseling centers place limits on sessions • 48% promote themselves as short-term services • Average number of sessions is 6.2 • 88% of directors report an increase in the number of students on campus with severe psychological problems • 92% of directors report an increase in the number of students seeking services Source: National Survey of College Counseling, Gallagher, 2012

  7. Statement of the Problem (ctd.) • More than half of schools that responded place limits on number of sessions (as low as 5 sessions) • Survey respondents are seeing an average of 223 new cases per semester • Survey respondents indicated truncated hours based on budget and placing services when most needed Source: Unpublished SUNY CCD survey results, Owens & Berger, 2012

  8. Statement of the Problem (ctd.) • At Farmingdale, we do not, nor have we in the last 30 years, had a waiting list • New patients are offered an appointment within 48 hours of calling or visiting the office • ALL crisis cases are seen immediately (some after-hours cases are dealt with by phone with the assistance of University Police and Residence Life staff) • University police attend the State Police Academy • Not campus security • Well-trained (most are EMTs) Source: Internal Data from FSC CMHS File Review

  9. Statement of the Problem (ctd.) • No session limits • Average number of sessions at CMHS: 5.95 • Modal number of sessions at CMHS: 1 • Median number of sessions at CMHS: 2 (heavy positive skew) Source: Internal Data from FSC CMHS File Review

  10. Program Description

  11. Program Overview • 4 Sessions • Delivered in groups of 4 to 8 students • Content: • Psychoeducation • Training in specific cognitive-behavioral technique for stress management • Highlighting other ways to manage stress

  12. Session 1: Icebreaker and Intro to Group Work • Set goals • Set rules for the group • Ice breaker • Initial measurement of symptoms

  13. Session 2: Introduction of Stress Management Techniques • Stress reaction • Symptoms of stress • Long-term effects of stress • Sources of stress • Some coping mechanisms • Discussion of rational and irrational thought patterns • Assign REBT homework

  14. REBT Primer “people are not disturbed by things, but by the view they take of them” – Epictetus – Greek Stoic philosopher

  15. REBT • A form of CBT created and developed by Albert Ellis (1913-2007) • Both a system of psychotherapy and a philosophy • Largely based on the writings of Greek Stoic philosophers

  16. REBT • Fundamental premise: we cause/increase emotional disturbance by the way in which we view events • Through the language we use, our beliefs, attitudes, and the meaning we give to events, others, and ourselves, we create/increase emotional disturbance. • Typically, people blame their emotional disturbance on events or on people ‘doing things’ to them (‘he/she makes me so angry!’) – REBT sees our beliefs, and specifically, the meaning we give those events, as the cause of those disturbances.

  17. A-B-C Model of Emotional Disturbance • A: Activating event – can be external or internal • B: Beliefs – include meanings, assumptions, attributions, desires, demands, etc. • C: (emotional/behavioral) Consequence • To the extent that one’s beliefs are rigid, absolute, and dogmatic, REBT predicts that individual will experience emotional and behavioral consequences that are frequently negative and self-defeating.

  18. Ellis: Three Core Irrational Beliefs – the ‘3 Musts’ • I must do well and win the approval of others or I’m no good • Other people must treat me fairly and well 100% of the time, in exactly the way I want them to treat me, and if they don’t I’m no good and they deserve to be condemned • I must get exactly what I want, when I want it, and I must never get what I don’t want. It’s terrible if I don’t’ get what I want, and I can’t stand it

  19. Secondary IB’s • Demands: musts/shoulds/oughts • Awfulizing/Catastrophizing: it’s awful, terrible, horrible • Low Frustration Tolerance: I can’t stand it! • Self/Other/Life Ratings: I’m bad/worthless; life is not worthwhile; he/she is bad/worthless

  20. Example Intervention: Identifying IB’s, Disputing them, and Substituting RB’s • A) Final exams, Final projects • B) ‘it’s unfair! This professor expects too much from us’ - unrealistic demand ‘I can’t stand it! There’s no way I can do this’ - low frustration tolerance ‘I’m going to fail out of school!’ - catastrophizing C) Emotional: Anxiety, anger, frustration; Self- defeating Behavior (procrastination, avoidance)

  21. Session 3: Reinforcing Thought-Changing Techniques • Review REBT homework • Extend awareness of IBs and RBs to working toward change • Assign homework

  22. Session 4: Extending Techniques to the Rest of YourLife • Review homework • Discuss any difficulty that participants had with homework • Elicit future problems and strategies for dealing with them utilizing REBT principles • Elicit feedback • Encourage future help-seeking • Administer post measures

  23. Results and Discussion

  24. Measures Used • Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-2) • Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) • Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

  25. Pre to Post Changes

  26. Pre to Post Changes

  27. Discussion • This was in 2, imagine if we’d been able to do 4. • Program is easy to administer and repeatable. • Program can be extended in length and altered to fit specific diagnoses. • Program is efficient. • A more desirable alternative to waiting list or referral to outside providers. • May be used in conjunction with traditional approaches (e.g., individual therapy). • Not for those with serious psychopathology.

  28. Questions

More Related