Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agenci...
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 34

Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 74 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities. David P. Kelly, J.D., M.A. Administration for Children and Families, Children’s Bureau Ying-Ying Yuan, Ph.D. Walter R. McDonald & Associates, Inc. Teri Covington, M.P.H.

Download Presentation

Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Working together to prevent child fatalities collaboration among review teams child welfare agencies and communities

Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities

David P. Kelly, J.D., M.A.

Administration for Children and Families, Children’s Bureau

Ying-Ying Yuan, Ph.D.

Walter R. McDonald & Associates, Inc.

Teri Covington, M.P.H.

National Center for the Review and Prevention of Child Deaths

Liz Oppenheim, J.D.

Walter R. McDonald & Associates, Inc.


Working together to prevent child fatalities collaboration among review teams child welfare agencies and communities

Examining Child Fatality Reviews and Cross-System Fatality Reviews to Promote the Safety of Children and Youth at Risk

  • Funded by the Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau

  • 9/26/2011 through 9/25/2012

  • Contract Number: HHSP23320095656WC

Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


Overview of presentation

Overview of Presentation

  • Study Purpose

    • Identify promising practices for fatality reviews and furthering collaboration among reviews

  • Methods

    • Literature Review

    • Review of Recommendations and Outcomes

    • Site Visits/Telephone Interviews

    • National Meeting

  • What Do Fatality Statistics Tell Us?

  • Fatality Review Structures & Processes

  • Fatality Review Recommendations

  • Summary

  • Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    What do fatality statistics tell us

    What Do Fatality Statistics Tell Us?

    • Several data sources for national statistics

      • Vital Statistics

      • National Resource Center for the Review and Prevention of Child Deaths

      • National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS)

    • Children younger than 1 and 1-4 are at highest risk

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Child mortality has decreased dramatically for 1 4 year olds 1

    Child Mortality Has Decreased Dramatically for 1- 4 Year Olds1

    • Overall death rate has consistently downward trend

      • 1,419 deaths per 100,000 in 1907

      • 28.6 deaths per 100,000 in 2007

  • Homicide rate increased between 1970-2007 by 26% (points in time)

    • Homicide percentages increased from 2% to 8%

  • Racial/ethnic, socioeconomic and geographic disparities continue

    • Black children 50% higher mortality risk than White counterparts and socioeconomic disparities increasing

      1Singh G.K. (2010). Child Mortality in the United States, 1935-2007: Large Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities Have Persisted Over Time. A 75th Anniversary Publication. Health

      Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services. Available from:

      http://www.hrsa.gov/healthit/images/mchb_child_mortality_pub.pdf

  • Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Leading causes of death for 1 4 year olds 2007 singh 2010

    Leading Causes of Death for 1- 4 Year Olds, 2007 (Singh, 2010)

    • Infant mortality rate is at an all time low:

      • 6.39 infants deaths per 1,000 live births

    • Unintentional injuries: 34%

      • 1/3 of these relate to motor vehicle accidents

    • Birth defects: 12%

    • Homicides: 8%

    • Diseases:

      • Cancer: 8%

      • Heart Disease: 4%

      • Less than 2%

        • Pneumonia: 2%

        • Septicemia: 2%

        • Perinatal conditions: <2%

        • Benign Neoplasms: 1%

        • COPD: 1%

    • Other causes: 27%

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Background on a review of selected records ncdr crs

    Background on a Review of Selected RecordsNCDR-CRS

    • 34,000 records of deaths of children between 0-5 years of age were reviewed from 36 States

      • A subset of the 49,000 records (2008-2011)

    • Using a very broad definition of CAN related, 13% or 4,500 deaths were CAN-related

    • The data are from 36 States but may not be all deaths in all years from each State.

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Causes of death related to can

    Causes of Death Related to CAN

    • More than half of deaths from assault or drowning had a relationship to CAN

      • 78% of deaths from assault (including use of weapons)

      • 53% of deaths from drowning

  • A third to a fifth of deaths from burns, asphxia, and motor vehicles were considered CAN related

    • 33% of deaths from fire and burns

    • 25% of deaths from asphxia

    • 20% of deaths from motor vehicles

  • Smaller percentages for other causes of death

    • 11% from SIDS

    • 2% from perinatal causes (prematurity, LBW etc.)

  • Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Child maltreat ment fatality rates ncands 2002 2010

    NCANDS

    CHILD MALTREAT- MENT FATALITY RATES, NCANDS, 2002–2010

    • The National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System:

      • collects data from all States on the CPS investigation or assessment of alleged maltreatment, including deaths

      • 11,600 fatalities are in the case level database from 2002-2012.

    • The majority of the information is provided at the case level, but many States report on additional deaths.

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Child maltreatment fatalities ncands

    Child Maltreatment Fatalities, NCANDS

    • Number of child fatalities due to maltreatment has fluctuated during the past 5 years; since 2007 on a decrease

    • Explanations included system improvements that reduced case backlog and successful prevention programs.

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Child maltreatment fatalities by age ncands 2010 n 44 states unique count

    Child Maltreatment Fatalities by Age, NCANDS,2010N=44 States (unique count)

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Race of 0 and 1 4 fatality cohorts

    Race of 0 and 1-4 Fatality Cohorts

    Race of Age, 0

    Race of Age, 1-4

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Maltreatment types of 0 and 1 4 fatality cohorts ncands 2010

    Maltreatment Types of 0 and 1-4 Fatality Cohorts, NCANDS, 2010

    Maltreatment Types of Age, 0

    Maltreatment Types of Age, 1-4

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Perpetrator relationship of 0 and 1 4 fatality cohorts

    Perpetrator Relationship of 0 and 1-4 Fatality Cohorts

    Perpetrator Relationship Age, 0

    Perpetrator Relationship Age,1-4

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Summary

    Summary

    • Child fatalities due to abuse and neglect can be understood within a context of all deaths of young children

    • Social and community decisions contribute to the definitions of child abuse and neglect deaths

    • We seek to reduce child fatalities through

      • Better identification of causes and factors leading to death

      • More targeted prevention programs

      • Involvement of all sectors of society

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Fatality review structures processes

    Fatality Review Structures & Processes

    • The web of reviews

    • Shared perspectives

    • Fatality review structures and processes

    • Collaboration for improving administration and processes

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    The web of reviews

    The Web of Reviews

    Background

    • 50 States and the District of Columbia have an active CDR program (at the State and/or local or regional level)

    • 17 States use their CDR team as the citizen review panel for review of fatalities

    • Many child welfare agencies conduct internal child fatality reviews

    • 200 Fetal and Infant Mortality Review (FIMR) programs in 40 States

    • 144 Domestic Violence Fatality Review (DVFR) teams at the State and local level

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Working together to prevent child fatalities collaboration among review teams child welfare agencies and communities

    The Web of Reviews

    State/Local/Regional

    CDR

    CRP

    DVR

    FIMR

    Internal Agency

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Shared perspectives

    Shared Perspectives

    • Deaths and serious injuries are sentinel events:

      markers for the health and safety of people.

    • Environmental, social, economic, health and behavioral factors impact the death or injury.

    • These factors are so multidimensional that responsibility for a death or injury doesn’t belong to any one agency or organization.

    • Reviews focus on what went wrong and how can we fix it, not who is at fault and who should we blame.

    • The best reviews are multi-disciplinary.

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Fatality review structures processes1

    Fatality Review Structures & Processes

    • Membership

      • All are multidisciplinary

      • May not always have all the needed representatives

    • Administrative Homes

      • Many different administrative homes

    • Data collection

      • All team processes include data collection activities

      • For some teams, legislation provides access to needed information

      • Some teams rely on information brought to reviews by team members

      • Some teams conduct interviews with family members

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Benefits of collaboration

    Benefits of Collaboration

    • Legislative support

    • More cases

    • More information

    • More knowledge about agencies

    • Existing multidisciplinary team

    • More resources

    • Near fatalities

    • Access to citizen participation

    • Coordinated prevention

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Strategies for collaboration

    Strategies for Collaboration

    Administrative home

    Membership

    Case identification

    Data collection

    Joint meetings

    Cross pollination/communication

    Identification of cross-cutting issues

    Joint training

    Develop joint recommendations

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Fatality review recommendations

    Fatality Review Recommendations

    Findings

    • Types of recommendations made

    • Implementation of recommendations

    • Results

    • Writing effective recommendations

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Prevalence and types of recommendations

    Prevalence and Types of Recommendations

    • Most of the recommendations were for:

      • increasing public awareness and education

      • improving policies and legislation

      • strengthening organizational capacity

      • Agency, persons, or organizations often not identified

    • Many global statements indicating that parents should make specific changes in behavior or that communities should provide particular supports or services

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Prevalence and types of recommendations1

    Prevalence and Types of Recommendations

    • No mention of collaboration to enhance injury prevention

      • CDR and FIMR teams made recommendations regarding SIDS

      • DVFR teams acknowledged the impact of DV on children

    • All teams acknowledged that collaboration among many agencies and providers was necessary in order to effectively implement recommendations

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Prevalence and types of recommendations2

    Prevalence and Types of Recommendations

    • CAN Related Recommendations

      • 78.8 % of the recommendations pertained to some type of educational activity

      • 28.5 % of the recommendations were for parent education

    • Non-CAN Related Recommendations

      • 78.8 % of the recommendations pertained to some type of educational activity

    • 27.5 % of the recommendations were for parent education

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Working together to prevent child fatalities collaboration among review teams child welfare agencies and communities

    Implementation of Recommendations

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities

    • Commitment to prevention

      • Each team member must commit to use review information to educate their own agencies and advocate for needed changes

    • Dissemination strategies

      • Disseminate reports far and wide

      • Select the right messenger(s)

      • Work with the media

      • Make in-person presentations

    • Increasing Likelihood of Implementation

      • Include people with authority to effect change

      • Conduct advocacy with legislators and elected officials

      • Implement a separate Community Action Team (CAT)

      • Develop memoranda of understanding regarding next steps


    Results of fatality review team recommendations

    Results of Fatality Review Team Recommendations

    • Improved interagency communication

    • Numerous strategies to promote public awareness and education

    • Prevention strategies focused on high risk populations

      • Strengthened organizational capacity

      • Changes in policy and legislation

      • Improved service delivery

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Writing effective recommendations

    Writing Effective Recommendations

    • Assessment of the Problem

      • Describe particular risks or protective factors

      • Include information on best and promising practices

      • Discuss current efforts, resources, and capacity

    • Process

      • Develop or review recommendations with agencies identified

        to implement them

      • Prioritize recommendations

    • Recommendation

      • Discuss the primary outcome sought

      • Tie recommendations to specific findings

      • Indentify the agency, persons, or organizations

      • Identify target population

      • Include detailed plan of action

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Strategies for collaboration1

    Strategies for Collaboration

    Develop an integrated database of fatality review findings and recommendations

    Assessing risk factors

    Identify shared prevention strategies

    Develop joint training

    Share information about best and promising practices

    Hold joint meetings to create/share findings and recommendations

    Develop joint reports

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Summary1

    Summary

    • A lot of time, effort, and hard work is being dedicated to conducting fatality reviews.

    • There are a number of creative and effective strategies in place for effective review meetings and collaboration among reviews.

    • Many of the recommendations of fatality review teams have resulted in increased public awareness and education.

    • Improvements in organizational capacity, improved practice and policy, and new legislation.

    • There is a lot to learn from one another about improving review processes, recommendations and outcomes.

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Resource center websites

    Resource Center Websites

    • National Center on Substance Abuse and Child Welfare

      • http://www.ncsacw.samsha.gov

    • National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational Improvement

    • http://muskie.usm.maine.edu/helpkids/index.htm

    • National Child Welfare Workforce Institute

    • http://www.ncwwi.org/

    • National Domestic Violence Fatality Review Initiative

    • http://www.ndvfri.org/

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Resource center websites continued

    Resource Center Websites (continued)

    • National Fetal and Infant Mortality Review Program

      • http://www.nfimr.org

    • National Resource Center for Child Protective Services

    • http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/tta/neccps.htm

    • National Center for the Review and Prevention of Child Fatalities

    • http://childdeathreview.org/

    • National Citizens Review Panel Virtual Community

    • http://www.uky.edu/SocialWork/crp/

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


    Contact information

    Contact Information

    David P. Kelly, J.D., M.A.

    [email protected]

    Ying-Ying Yuan, Ph.D.

    [email protected]

    Teri Covington, M.P.H.

    [email protected]

    Liz Oppenheim, J.D.

    [email protected]

    Working Together to Prevent Child Fatalities: Collaboration Among Review Teams, Child Welfare Agencies, and Communities


  • Login