1 / 73

management of low grade gliomas

management of low grade gliomas. robert r johnson , m.d. department of radiation oncology july 15, 2010. table of contents. background pathological classification molecular features presentation treatment technique. background. slow-growing tumors

saxton
Download Presentation

management of low grade gliomas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. management of low grade gliomas robert r johnson, m.d. department of radiation oncology july 15, 2010

  2. table of contents • background • pathological classification • molecular features • presentation • treatment • technique

  3. background • slow-growing tumors • 10% of primary brain tumors in adults • 20-25% of gliomas • 2000 cases/year in u.s. • divided into: • pilocytic astrocytoma • diffusely infiltrating glioma

  4. background • pilocytic astrocytoma • more common in children (jpa) • cerebellum • do occur in young adults • low grade • even after recurrence • cured by surgery • > 90% long-term survival after complete resection • 70-80% after incomplete resection

  5. background • diffusely infiltrating glioma • 3rd-4th decade of life • 20 years earlier than high-grade gliomas • slow growing but eventually fatal • 80% transform to high-grade

  6. histological subtypes • astrocytoma – 50% • fibrillary • protoplasmic • gemistocytic • behaves more like anaplastic astrocytoma • oligodendroglioma – 28% • oligoastrocytoma – 22%

  7. prognosis • 42,688 patients diagnosed between 1995-2006 • astrocytoma • 5-year survival 47% • oligoastrocytoma • 5-year survival 57% • oligodendroglioma • 5-year survival 79% http://cbtrus.org/2010-NPCR-SEER/Table23.pdf

  8. pathological classification • who grading • I: slow-growing, non-malignant • pilocytic astrocytoma • II: relatively slow-growing, can recur as higher-grade tumor • astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, oligoastrocytoma

  9. pathological classification • stanne-mayo classification • based on 4 criteria: • nuclear atypia • mitoses • endothelial proliferation • necrosis • grade I: 0/4 • pilocyticastrocytoma • grade II: 1/4 • astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, oligoastrocytoma

  10. molecular features • ploidy • better prognosis with diploid relative to aneuploid • proliferation • better prognosis with ki-67 index < 3% • co-deletion of 1p and 19q

  11. co-deletion of 1p/19q • found in 70-75% oligodendroglioma • 35-40% oligoastrocytoma • rarely in pure astrocytoma • favorable prognosis • 139 samples of 80 patients with low-grade glioma • median survival: • 15 years with co-deletion • 5 years without • more likely to respond to chemotherapy

  12. presentation

  13. imaging • pilocytic astrocytoma • well-circumscribed • cystic • contrast-enhancing • vasogenic edema is rare

  14. imaging • diffusely infiltrating glioma • ct • diffuse , non-enhancing • calcifications with oligodendroglioma

  15. imaging • diffusely infiltrating glioma • mri • hypointense and non-enhancing on t1 • hyperintense on t2

  16. treatment • pilocytic astrocytoma • more amenable to total resection • well-circumscribed • close follow-up after surgery • 70-80% long-term survival after subtotal resection • transformation to high-grade glioma very rare • adjuvant radiotherapy not typically offered • 50-55 gy for recurrent/unresectable disease

  17. pilocytic astrocytoma • 20 adults from ncctg 86-72-51 followed prospectively • 3 patients irradiated after biopsy • 50.4 gy • 17 patients observed after subtotal or gross total resection brown et al. ijrobp 2004;58:1153-1160.

  18. pilocytic astrocytoma

  19. pilocytic astrocytoma

  20. pilocytic astrocytoma • excellent prognosis irrespective of treatment modality • distinctly different behavior from diffusely infiltrating gliomas • 10-year survival 95% vs 17% in ncctg 86-72-51

  21. diffusely infiltrating glioma • surgery • radiation • chemotherapy

  22. surgery • usually performed first • establish diagnosis • tumor debulking • total resection uncommon due to diffuse infiltration • rarely curative • retrospective data suggests benefit for total/subtotal resection • most accurate pathological assessment

  23. radiation • 3 randomized trials have assessed timing and dose of adjuvant radiotherapy • eortc 22485 • immediate vs delayed • eortc 22484 • 45 gy vs 59.4 gy • ncctg 86-72-51 • 50.4 gy vs 64.8 gy

  24. eortc 22485 • 314 patients with resected or biopsied low-grade glioma • inclusion criteria • supratentorial low-grade glioma • 16-65 years • karnofsky > 60 • randomized to 54 gy/30 fractions vs observation and radiation at progression van den bent et al. lancet 2005;366:985-990.

  25. eortc 22485

  26. eortc 22485

  27. eortc 22485 • 65% patients in observation group treated with radiation at recurrence • median survival after recurrence 3.4 years vs 1.0 years • favoring observation group • ~70% histologically confirmed recurrences high-grade • no quality of life study

  28. eortc 22485 • conclusions • no difference in overall survival for early vs delayed radiotherapy • longer time to recurrence with early rt • unknown if rt or recurrence is worse for quality of life • seizures at 1 year • 25% with rt, 41% with observation • P = 0.03

  29. eortc 22484 • 379 patients with resected or biopsied low-grade glioma • inclusion criteria • supratentorial low-grade glioma • incompletely resected pilocytic astrocytoma • 16-65 years • karnofsky > 60 • randomized to 45 gy/25 fractions vs 59.4 gy/33 fractions karim et al. ijrobp 1996; 36:549-556.

  30. eortc 22484 5 year os 58% vs 59% 5 year pfs 47% vs 50%

  31. eortc 22484 • interesting subgroup analyses • extent of resection • size of tumor

  32. eortc 22484 • outcome analyzed by extent of resection • significant improvements in os and pfs with more extensive surgery • no dose response

  33. eortc 22484

  34. eortc 22484

  35. eortc 22484 • acute toxicity more common in high-dose arm • 15% vs 8% required > 1 week break • no difference in late toxicity • no radionecrosis in either arm

  36. eortc 22484 • conclusions • no dose response above 45 gy • prognostic importance of • extent of resection • tumor size • histology • astrocytoma worst • neurological deficits

  37. eortc 22484/22485 • poor prognostic variables • age > 40 • tumor > 6 cm • tumor crossing midline • astrocytoma histology • neurological deficits • 0-2 = low risk, median survival 7.7 years • > 3 = high risk, median survival 3.2 years

  38. ncctg 86-72-51 • 203 patients with resected or biopsied low-grade glioma • inclusion criteria • supratentorial low-grade glioma • pilocytic astrocytoma excluded • > 18 years • randomized to 50.4 gy/28 fractions vs 64.8 gy/36 fractions shaw et al. jco 2002;20:2267-2276.

  39. ncctg 86-72-51

  40. ncctg 86-72-51 • toxicity • grade 3-5 toxicity seen in 13% patients on both arms • grade 3-5 severe toxicity • radionecrosis and encephalitis • 5% vs 2.5% at 2 years • more common with high dose

  41. ncctg-86-72-51 • conclusions • no dose response above 50.4 gy • higher severe toxicity with high dose • prognostic importance of • extent of resection • tumor size • histology • astrocytoma worst • age

  42. radiation • conclusions • no difference in survival with post-op rt vs rt at progression • improved pfs • no dose response above 45-50 gy • increased toxicity with higher dose • age, histology, tumor size, extent of resection all predict outcome

  43. chemotherapy • no established role • 2 trials reported encouraging results with ccnu • neither significant • pcv and temozolomide also been tested

  44. ccnu • swog • randomized 60 patients with incompletely excised low-grade glioma to 55 gy +/- concurrent ccnu • median survival favored chemo arm • 7.4 years vs 4.5 years • not significant • prematurely closed due to slow accrual • possible benefit if adequately powered eyre et al. j neurosurg. 1993.

  45. pcv • rtog 98-02 • 3 armed trial • arm 1: low risk (age < 40, gross total resection) • observe • arms 2 and 3: high risk (age > 40, subtotal resection or biopsy) • randomized to 54 gy +/- 6 cycles adjuvant pcv • procarbazine, ccnu, vincristine

  46. pcv • rtog 98-02 cont’d • preliminary results presented at asco in 2006

More Related