1 / 25

2012 Annual Pupil Transportation Conference

2012 Annual Pupil Transportation Conference. June 20, 2012 Roanoke, Virginia. Employee Evaluations and Discipline: How to Handle Them Effectively and Stay Out of Legal Hot Water. Yvonne S. Wellford Senior Assistant County Attorney and Counsel to the Hanover County School Board.

savea
Download Presentation

2012 Annual Pupil Transportation Conference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2012 Annual Pupil Transportation Conference June 20, 2012 Roanoke, Virginia

  2. Employee Evaluations and Discipline: How to Handle Them Effectively andStay Out of Legal Hot Water Yvonne S. Wellford Senior Assistant County Attorney and Counsel to the Hanover County School Board

  3. Employee Evaluations • Framework of an Effective Evaluation • Focus on employee’s core responsibilitiesbased on the position the employee holds • Develop performance targets for the employee that are job-related • Tie the evaluation to the performance targets you developed in the prior year • Avoid commenting on the employee’s personal life – stick to how he/she performs the job

  4. Employee Evaluations • Effective Evaluations Are Fair and Accurate • Be candid – don’t give undeserved charitable evaluations • Identify the employee’s shortcomings, as well as strengths • Be constructive • Support your comments with examples

  5. Employee Evaluations • Advantages • May improve employee’s performance! • Will give employee fair warning of the need for improvement • Can enhance overall morale in your workplace (hardworking employees expect you to require similar effort from all) • It’s supporting documentation for subsequent disciplinary actions and any challenges to them by employee grievance or lawsuit

  6. Employee Evaluations • It’s hard to explain away positive evaluations • A jury is likely to think:if it’s in writing, it must be true Consider these examples . . .

  7. Employee Evaluations • Conferences • Face to face discussions of evaluations • Conference should involve the employee and the supervisor – not a committee • Allow the employee to respond to the evaluation, offer his or her comments and put them in writing • The employee and supervisor should both sign the evaluation

  8. Employee Evaluations • Confidentiality • Share the contents of performance evaluations only with those who need to know about it

  9. Employee Discipline • Documentation • Should support the reason for and fairness of the personnel decision • Use it because you can’t remember everything that may be important • Obtain the employee’s signature on all documentation that should be included in the personnel file (evaluations, written warnings, corrective action plans) • Juries expect employers to make written records of employee performance problems

  10. Employee Discipline • Progressive Discipline • For problems or policy violations that can be corrected through counseling • Gives employees an opportunity to choose their future course of action with a clear understanding of the consequences • Demonstrates that the employer took reasonable steps to inform the employee of the problem and provided an opportunity to improve

  11. Employee Discipline • Preparing for disciplinary action • Inform the employee of the specific allegations that might result in disciplinary action • Investigate the facts (including giving employee a chance to explain his/her side of the story) • Determine whether the employee violated a policy or procedure that he/she knew or should have known about

  12. Employee Discipline • Stay consistent – how have others been disciplined for this problem? • Determine whether the employee has filed any recent complaints (including the EEOC, Dep’t of Labor or internally) about the workplace. Disciplinary action could be considered an act of retaliation.

  13. Employee Discipline • Reasonableness of disciplinary action • Should be related to the seriousness of the offense – make the punishment fit the offense • The employee’s past disciplinary record should be considered

  14. Employee Discipline • Take prompt action • Take disciplinary action when the problem arises – not weeks or months later • VEC may view employer’s inaction as accepting the employee’s misconduct

  15. Employee Discipline • Delivering the message • Tell employee the disciplinary action to be taken in a meeting with the supervisor and another management team member • Tone of the meeting should be professional and calm • Limit discussion to the disciplinary action being taken, the reasons for doing so, and the consequences of further policy violations or performance problems

  16. Employee Discipline • The goal is to provide information to the employee – not to debate your decision or to discuss another employee • If delivering anything more serious than a counseling, be prepared with the written warning, corrective action plan, etc. to give to the employee • Obtain employee’s signature on your copy to acknowledge he/she received it.

  17. Employee Discipline • Case Study: Stein v. Churchville-Chili Central School District • School District received parent complaints about Stein, a bus driver • Stein had taken pictures of students, they claimed • District investigated and found Stein had numerous performance problems and had engaged in misconduct • Stein used profanity, drove at excessive speeds, misused the microphone on the bus, stopped the bus suddenly to throw students against other students, mocked students • District had received complaints about Stein’s inability to get along with & control students during the prior school year

  18. Employee Discipline • When the District terminated Stein, he sued for age discrimination • Court ruled in favor of the District. Why? • “The District investigated and found credible a number of allegations . . . relating to Stein’s failure to perform appropriately as a school bus driver.”

  19. Employee Discipline What worked well for the District? • They documented the complaints about Stein and their investigation of them • They investigated the facts • They acted promptly

  20. Questions?

More Related