the initial trauma and shock

2. the initial trauma and shock

3. the crowd is not violent andin fact regulating matters itself

4. the crowd is not violent zero violence ! zero!! “thousands”... “stone pelting, riotous mob” : where ?? shadows inside also tell us the time –no violence !

5. between crowd and police…photographers…no violence

6. police…photographers…no violence between crowd and police…photographers…zero violence draw your conclusions

7. water canons… why ? stones if really then peltednot seen ?!!

8. in this ‘war like situation’ a uniformed mob is pelting stones ! no stones, on this side !! photographers walking around – can stones be thrown into a crowd in a mosque by police ?!!

9. count the thousands, riotous, uncontrolled, militant mob

10. What happened ? Who’s responsible ? What were the lapses ? Who is accountable ? Most crucial, how true is the police version ? What is the truth ? the questions…

11. were ambulancesnot allowedinside Mecca Masjid soon after the bomb blast ?

12. the crowd… of only spectators is police version correct ? who ordered tear gas, firing, into the mosque ? who provoked the crowd… and why ?

13. the position of the camera is inside themosque – so where’s the violence ?? who is being tear gassed ? why ??

14. . 303 = 1850 fps = 38000 psi = 1.6 km .303 1850 fps 38000 psi 1.6 km : hits stone and distorts to rough shrapnel – can kill, maim – can travel through several persons when fired into thick crowd - armed men, falsely claiming right of self defence, and killing others, are guilty of murder – they qualify as terrorists – or are terrorists only “Islamic” and “jehadi” ? or are there uniformed terrorists – anti-national non-secular traitors within India ?

15. what was theperceived threat ? ACCORDING TO THE POLICE ITSELF, THE CROWD WAS SHOUTING… … … … ALLAH HU AKBAR !! we don’t need a reason… FIRE ! … FIRE !! “Hullo ? ANNAA… SAATHH HO GAYE !!” acp sahib farmaathein hain, warning was issued in telugu… to an urdu speaking crowd inside a mosque… acp sahib !!

16. If you’re being attacked… you can walk away unconcerned as … crowd was over 200 feet away ! contrary to what this photograph suggests, there was in fact a very real threat –only it was a threat not to the police but to the fleeing crowd, to sanity, to rule of law, to public safety… from the insane behaviour of the homicidal “shooters” disgracing police uniforms and secularism

17. attack !

18. attack : can sometimes be… a real pleasure… watch videos : see SLR firing man… enjoying shooting at fleeing people

19. identities required ! to identify the person or persons responsible for the said opening of fire. curiously, witness after witness is “unable to identify” faces, voices… what are you when you shield culprits ? what type of state abets murders ? why was this Commission constituted ? what would its duty be ? system on trial ? daag bade gehre hain… naqaabaon se dhake chehre hain…

20. Unaware of area he polices Has no idea of crucial details Did not do what is expected of senior officers to oversee situation Acted as protector of one community only Witness : DCP Dr M Kantha RaoStatementsFacts Those Establish Does not know if there is a madrassa in Mecca Masjid Did not move from in front of mosque in entire day’s events Focus : protect jewellery shops of Hindus instead of maintaining law and order

21. so what if its firing at the back ? Its their back

22. one must aim carefully and at the chests… after all, the targets are at a distance… from that safe distance, they can’t do anything to us when does exercise of alleged right convert to culpable homicide ?

23. The fabrication of false evidence, the putting of statements into the mouths of persons who are unaware of what they testify to : why would the police do this but to cover up their crimes ? The government that appointed this Commission … itself does not want the truth known ! On whose instructions are such things done ? Witnesses : “WITHDRAWN”EventsFacts Those Establish Witnesses who have filed affidavits favouring the police version, mysteriously are “withdrawn” by counsel for police, when the time comes for them to face cross examination ?! Why are they being shielded by the police, from exposure for their lies ? Why was the Commission prevented from learning the truth about fabrication of false testimonies by the police ?

24. Fabrication of evidence ! Story of attempt to burn falsified, since in face of police being unable to control, no burning took place ! Lying about copying of affidavits. Aggravation of events, figures to provide ex post facto justification for firing ! Falsifies story of police that firing at crowd was necessitated to prevent burning of pump, killing of police personnel. NOTE police version is self defence, firing and five persons falling on the spot !! Exaggerates figures to lend credence to story of massive uncontrollable crowd, though he was admittedly in hiding afraid for his own life. Witness : inspector P Sudhakar FIR made after consultations : AISA AISA LIKHE THO ACCHHAA REHTHAA ! 30 minutes they hid : more than enough time to burn, kill destroy ! “Not aware” his affidavit and those of two others identical ! Affidavit prepared in Telugu “forming basis of present affidavit”, DESTROYED ! At time of FIR unaware some people had died in firing ! Crowd figure escalates from 200-300 to 500-600… ! At time of firing crowd was at “long distance” !

26. the facts speak for themselves

27. Police version of self defense falsified Firing at retreating crowd established Absence of necessity to fire established Falsehood of “iron rods” details of “attack by crowd” established as police improvisation Witness : Constable Syed Shujath AliStatementsFacts Those Establish • 100 feet distance between crowd and police at pump when firing took place • Impossible to kill policemen or burn pump from that distance • No iron rods with crowd

28. “incentives” to constructive persons recall Addl DIG Shandilya’s “incentives” ? watch the first incentive the police gives to encourage helpful Muslims are these people attacking police or helping an injured person to safety ?

29. “anyone who helps themwill also get it” if the guy didn’t learn in school, tell his mother its his fault

30. Establishes version of arson and murder attempt to be pure fabrication by police They conspired together to mislead inquiry and are all equally guilty of fabrication of false evidence If they are not blessed with telepathy then they are liars Since Inspector Sudhakar has admitted absence of telepathy, their liar status alone remains – should they not be behind bars ? Witness : Ramachandra ReddyStatementsFacts Those Establish Photos Exhibits 46-48 are of pump after events ended His affidavit is a replica of those of Anantha Reddy and Sudhakar He still says he dictated the affidavit and does not know how Sudhakar’s affidavit content is the same

31. The fabrication of false evidence, the putting of statements into the mouths of persons who are unaware of what they testify to : why would the police do this but to cover up their crimes ? The government that appointed this Commission … itself does not want the truth known ! On whose instructions are such things done ? Witnesses : “WITHDRAWN”EventsFacts Those Establish Witnesses who have filed affidavits favouring the police version, mysteriously are “withdrawn” by counsel for police, when the time comes for them to face cross examination ?! Why are they being shielded by the police, from exposure for their lies ? Why was the Commission prevented from learning the truth about fabrication of false testimonies by the police ?

32. The only logical reason can be that the threats were from the police itself : to not appear and allow cross examination, lest the facts be known and the police stand indicted and exposed. (The petrol pump workers were the ones who fabricated the scene of alleged arson at the pump at the instance, obviously, of the police.)‏ Witnesses : allegedly “THREATENED”EventsFacts Those Establish • Witnesses who testified favouring policemen’s versions, are friends of the police. Then, if they did receive threats, why did they not complain to the police and instead feel the necessity to complain to the Hon’ble Commission ?

33. acp redanna secures the scene of offence

34. acp redanna secures the scene of offence… and again nozzles are a notable feature what is “fabrication of false evidence” ? this Commission’s duty ? what can we Muslims legitimately expect from this Commission ?

35. watch movement of each pump employee… sequence directed by whom, mr acp ? “fabrication of false evidence” scene 1 : late evening twilight

36. stills from videos – check them out “fabrication of false evidence” scene 2 : late evening twilight

37. is someone fabricating evidence to justify the police murders ? who ?? “fabrication of false evidence” scene 3 : late evening twilight

38. system on trial, inclusive “fabrication of false evidence” scene 4 : late evening twilight

39. they fabricate evidence, concoct justification for the firing… “fabrication of false evidence” scene 5 : late evening twilight

40. attention ! inquiry officer anantha reddy speaks !! • Asked since it was stated in his affidavit that he had “made” facts, whether he had made up the facts in his affidavit, he said yes ! • He said he went only once to the petrol pump which means his “investigation” merely proceeded on police statements and he admits he did the investigation sitting in his room ! • He was shown his affidavit and that of Inspector Sudhakar and asked how it is that both are verbatim reproductions of each other, even duplicating broken sentences, abusive words, grammatical mistakes, etc. He said it is not true that they were identical ! • He was asked whether he was aware that filing such an affidavit containing matter that he knew was false constituted the offence of fabricating of false evidence. He said he is not aware of that also !

43. I beg your pardon !! • Whether thefailure of the Commission, to recognize the Muslim collective in the State as a heterogeneous social class; thefailure to exclude those insular classes of Muslims already recognized and established as Backward Classes while computing the population of the Muslims community; thefailure to collect data on social, educational and economic aspects in relation to only the remnant population of the Muslim collective; thefailure to formulate criteria of social backwardness, to identify the existence of any of further  classes/groups in the remnant Muslim population (in the context of insular classes of social  backwardness) and thefailure to apply such relevant  evolved criteria to the appropriate data and to reach  rational conclusions, renders the exercise by the  Commission and its consequent conclusions and  recommendationsirrational, perverse and invalid?; and (ii) Whether the provisions of the Ordinancebased exclusively on an invalid and unsustainable report of the Commission, areinvalid? • How rational, valid and sustainableis the very framing ofsuch a loaded question where the predisposition is so manifest ?Which judicial mind would frame an issue whichestablishes a priori what the judicial mind is to set out to determine ??

44. “Never in the history of our Republic has membership of a Backward Class been so enticing, so easy or so inviting” says our Court : anyone can convert to acquire backward status !! • Islam has no tradition, entrenched or in contemporary practice, prohibiting proselytization or conversion. Adventitious opportunities and advantages … inherent in a reservation programme, …, provide a powerful incentive to conversion … By the Ordinance, professing the faith of Islam better enables educational and public employment opportunities. Any person professing faith in Islam (according to the definition), is a Mulsim …is also a Backward Class…automatically … entitled to partake of the educational and public employment opportunities and benefits, in an entrenched and specially carved out quota of reservation …”. Any member indisputably belonging to a forward class amongst Hindus or belonging to any other race, caste, descent or religion would become backward by the mere expedient of “professing the faith of Islam” • But the Court ignores its own quote : It is impermissible to acquire the status of a Backward Class either by marriage, conversion or adoption --- Valsamma Paul Vs. Cochin UniversityAIR 1976 SC 1011

45. Enter The Minority Commission • The complaints from here and from within • The “right men at the right places” • The warrant... The repeat visit... The Ministerial interference and obstruction • The evidence... The comparison... • The suit... The relief sought... The transfer of a judge... The Justice V Bhaskara Rao Commission of Inquiry goes on... and on...

47. Jihad in Islam Islam teaches that peace should be established in the human societies of this world. To participate with God in establishment of peace, Muslims are called upon to be engaged in jihad, meaning "striving." The basic jihad is struggle of self, to speak about one's faith, bring it in obedience to God, and make sure that one is living a holy and righteous life. Another struggle is jihad as "holy war" fought only when the faith is being attacked or when Muslims are not allowed to practice their faith. Very few Muslims call "jihad of the sword" even in circumstances they believe to be wrongful. Willem A. Bijlefeld

49. (i) “period of disturbance”, in relation to a communally disturbed area, means the period during which it is declared to be a disturbed area under section 3 or section 55, as the case may be;  2 1 i declaration is ex post facto. prior acts would be outside the purview of the Act. The definition should be “the period commencing from the first of the acts leading to the situation requiring declaration of an area as communally disturbed, including but not restricted to dissemination of literature, speeches and any forms of visual representation, any acts aimed at and inconsistent with the sanctity of a place of worship or institution likely to cause interference in or disruption of the normal activities associated with such place of worship or institution… CV(P)&RV Bill…very disturbing indeed… !

50. 3. (1) Whenever the State Government is of the opinion that one or more scheduled offences are being committed in any area by any person or group of persons - in such manner and on such a scale which involves the use of criminal force or violence against any group, caste or community resulting in death or destruction of property; and  3 1 a “likely to be’ is better”… and “involves the use of criminal force” is an expression as would misdirect the thrust… deprivation and denial and distributing literature does not involve use of any criminal force, and most acts that lead up to actual use of criminal force would be out of the purview of the Act… “death or destruction of property” is an extreme proposition …if I cut off someone’s limb … ? : that cannot and ought not to be the legislative intent… needs to be replaced with “deprivation, denial, failure, injury or death, etc., or destruction of or diminution in value of property”… …continuing…violent…death… !!